search for: topologi

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1462 matches for "topologi".

Did you mean: topology
2020 Aug 21
17
[PATCH v3 0/6] Add virtio-iommu built-in topology
Add a topology description to the virtio-iommu driver and enable x86 platforms. Since [v2] we have made some progress on adding ACPI support for virtio-iommu, which is the preferred boot method on x86. It will be a new vendor-agnostic table describing para-virtual topologies in a minimal format. However some platforms don't use either ACPI or DT for booting (for example microvm), and will need the alternative topology description method proposed here. In addition, since the process to get a new ACPI table will take a long time, this provides a boot method even to...
2020 Aug 21
17
[PATCH v3 0/6] Add virtio-iommu built-in topology
Add a topology description to the virtio-iommu driver and enable x86 platforms. Since [v2] we have made some progress on adding ACPI support for virtio-iommu, which is the preferred boot method on x86. It will be a new vendor-agnostic table describing para-virtual topologies in a minimal format. However some platforms don't use either ACPI or DT for booting (for example microvm), and will need the alternative topology description method proposed here. In addition, since the process to get a new ACPI table will take a long time, this provides a boot method even to...
2013 Sep 17
2
Finding out CPU topology.
Hi all, I have been trying to find out cpu topology using libvirt. When I do 'virsh capabilites', I find this inside <topology> tag: <topology>       <cells num='1'>         <cell id='0'>           <memory unit='KiB'>3908488</memory>           <cpus num='4'>             <cpu id='0'
2019 Jan 09
0
[PATCH v5 06/20] drm/dp_mst: Introduce new refcounting scheme for mstbs and ports
The current way of handling refcounting in the DP MST helpers is really confusing and probably just plain wrong because it's been hacked up many times over the years without anyone actually going over the code and seeing if things could be simplified. To the best of my understanding, the current scheme works like this: drm_dp_mst_port and drm_dp_mst_branch both have a single refcount. When
2019 Jan 05
0
[PATCH v4 02/16] drm/dp_mst: Introduce new refcounting scheme for mstbs and ports
The current way of handling refcounting in the DP MST helpers is really confusing and probably just plain wrong because it's been hacked up many times over the years without anyone actually going over the code and seeing if things could be simplified. To the best of my understanding, the current scheme works like this: drm_dp_mst_port and drm_dp_mst_branch both have a single refcount. When
2020 Aug 26
0
[PATCH v3 0/6] Add virtio-iommu built-in topology
...te: > Add a topology description to the virtio-iommu driver and enable x86 > platforms. > > Since [v2] we have made some progress on adding ACPI support for > virtio-iommu, which is the preferred boot method on x86. It will be a > new vendor-agnostic table describing para-virtual topologies in a > minimal format. However some platforms don't use either ACPI or DT for > booting (for example microvm), and will need the alternative topology > description method proposed here. In addition, since the process to get > a new ACPI table will take a long time, this provides a...
2020 Sep 04
0
[PATCH v3 0/6] Add virtio-iommu built-in topology
...te: > Add a topology description to the virtio-iommu driver and enable x86 > platforms. > > Since [v2] we have made some progress on adding ACPI support for > virtio-iommu, which is the preferred boot method on x86. It will be a > new vendor-agnostic table describing para-virtual topologies in a > minimal format. However some platforms don't use either ACPI or DT for > booting (for example microvm), and will need the alternative topology > description method proposed here. In addition, since the process to get > a new ACPI table will take a long time, this provides a...
2013 Sep 17
0
Re: libvirt-users Digest, Vol 45, Issue 28
Test libvirt-users-request@redhat.com schrieb: >Send libvirt-users mailing list submissions to > libvirt-users@redhat.com > >To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-users >or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > libvirt-users-request@redhat.com > >You
2018 Dec 14
2
[WIP PATCH 03/15] drm/dp_mst: Introduce new refcounting scheme for mstbs and ports
On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 08:25:32PM -0500, Lyude Paul wrote: > The current way of handling refcounting in the DP MST helpers is really > confusing and probably just plain wrong because it's been hacked up many > times over the years without anyone actually going over the code and > seeing if things could be simplified. > > To the best of my understanding, the current scheme
2010 Mar 24
1
RHEL 5.4 errors in log file...
Hi. I have following errors in my log file: Mar 22 05:33:11 xentest libvirtd: 05:33:11.518: error : failed Xen syscall topology cpuset syntax error Mar 22 05:33:21 xentest libvirtd: 05:33:21.418: error : failed Xen syscall topology cpuset syntax error Mar 22 05:33:41 xentest libvirtd: 05:33:41.274: error : failed Xen syscall topology cpuset syntax error Mar 22 05:33:41 xentest libvirtd:
2018 Dec 19
1
[WIP PATCH 03/15] drm/dp_mst: Introduce new refcounting scheme for mstbs and ports
On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 04:27:58PM -0500, Lyude Paul wrote: > On Fri, 2018-12-14 at 10:29 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 08:25:32PM -0500, Lyude Paul wrote: > > > The current way of handling refcounting in the DP MST helpers is really > > > confusing and probably just plain wrong because it's been hacked up many > > > times over the
2018 Dec 18
0
[WIP PATCH 03/15] drm/dp_mst: Introduce new refcounting scheme for mstbs and ports
On Fri, 2018-12-14 at 10:29 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 08:25:32PM -0500, Lyude Paul wrote: > > The current way of handling refcounting in the DP MST helpers is really > > confusing and probably just plain wrong because it's been hacked up many > > times over the years without anyone actually going over the code and > > seeing if things
2018 Dec 14
0
[WIP PATCH 03/15] drm/dp_mst: Introduce new refcounting scheme for mstbs and ports
The current way of handling refcounting in the DP MST helpers is really confusing and probably just plain wrong because it's been hacked up many times over the years without anyone actually going over the code and seeing if things could be simplified. To the best of my understanding, the current scheme works like this: drm_dp_mst_port and drm_dp_mst_branch both have a single refcount. When
2020 Sep 25
2
[PATCH v3 0/6] Add virtio-iommu built-in topology
...escription to the virtio-iommu driver and enable x86 > > platforms. > > > > Since [v2] we have made some progress on adding ACPI support for > > virtio-iommu, which is the preferred boot method on x86. It will be a > > new vendor-agnostic table describing para-virtual topologies in a > > minimal format. However some platforms don't use either ACPI or DT for > > booting (for example microvm), and will need the alternative topology > > description method proposed here. In addition, since the process to get > > a new ACPI table will take a long t...
2020 Sep 25
2
[PATCH v3 0/6] Add virtio-iommu built-in topology
...escription to the virtio-iommu driver and enable x86 > > platforms. > > > > Since [v2] we have made some progress on adding ACPI support for > > virtio-iommu, which is the preferred boot method on x86. It will be a > > new vendor-agnostic table describing para-virtual topologies in a > > minimal format. However some platforms don't use either ACPI or DT for > > booting (for example microvm), and will need the alternative topology > > description method proposed here. In addition, since the process to get > > a new ACPI table will take a long t...
2020 Aug 21
0
[PATCH v3 5/6] iommu/virtio: Support topology description in config space
Platforms without device-tree nor ACPI can provide a topology description embedded into the virtio config space. Parse it. Use PCI FIXUP to probe the config space early, because we need to discover the topology before any DMA configuration takes place, and the virtio driver may be loaded much later. Since we discover the topology description when probing the PCI hierarchy, the virtual IOMMU
2018 Apr 20
1
[PATCH] v2v: rework handling of CPU topology
Instead of storing the number of sockets, cores, and threads separately with the possibility to have each of them optional, store them together, so either we have a CPU topology or none. This slightly simplifies the handling of CPU topology. Most of the output modes/producers already considered a missing information of a topology as "1" when any of the other was specified, so the
2019 Jan 05
19
[PATCH v4 00/16] MST refcounting/atomic helpers cleanup
This is the series I've been working on for a while now to get all of the atomic DRM drivers in the tree to use the atomic MST helpers, and to make the atomic MST helpers actually idempotent. Turns out it's a lot more difficult to do that without also fixing how port and branch device refcounting works so that it actually makes sense, since the current upstream implementation requires a
2020 Sep 04
1
[PATCH v3 5/6] iommu/virtio: Support topology description in config space
Hi Jean, On 8/21/20 3:15 PM, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote: > Platforms without device-tree nor ACPI can provide a topology > description embedded into the virtio config space. Parse it. > > Use PCI FIXUP to probe the config space early, because we need to > discover the topology before any DMA configuration takes place, and the > virtio driver may be loaded much later.
2020 Sep 24
2
[PATCH v3 0/6] Add virtio-iommu built-in topology
...escription to the virtio-iommu driver and enable x86 > > platforms. > > > > Since [v2] we have made some progress on adding ACPI support for > > virtio-iommu, which is the preferred boot method on x86. It will be a > > new vendor-agnostic table describing para-virtual topologies in a > > minimal format. However some platforms don't use either ACPI or DT for > > booting (for example microvm), and will need the alternative topology > > description method proposed here. In addition, since the process to get > > a new ACPI table will take a long t...