search for: topolog

Hi all, I have been trying to find out cpu topology using libvirt. When I do 'virsh capabilites', I find this inside <topology> tag: <topology>       <cells num='1'>         <cell id='0'>           <memory unit='KiB'>3908488</memory>           <cpus num='4'>        ...

Add a topology description to the virtio-iommu driver and enable x86 platforms. Since [v2] we have made some progress on adding ACPI support for virtio-iommu, which is the preferred boot method on x86. It will be a new vendor-agnostic table describing para-virtual topologies in a minimal format. However some pl...

Add a topology description to the virtio-iommu driver and enable x86 platforms. Since [v2] we have made some progress on adding ACPI support for virtio-iommu, which is the preferred boot method on x86. It will be a new vendor-agnostic table describing para-virtual topologies in a minimal format. However some pl...

...ithout anyone actually going over the code and seeing if things could be simplified. To the best of my understanding, the current scheme works like this: drm_dp_mst_port and drm_dp_mst_branch both have a single refcount. When this refcount hits 0 for either of the two, they're removed from the topology state, but not immediately freed. Both ports and branch devices will reinitialize their kref once it's hit 0 before actually destroying themselves. The intended purpose behind this is so that we can avoid problems like not being able to free a remote payload that might still be active, due to...

...ithout anyone actually going over the code and seeing if things could be simplified. To the best of my understanding, the current scheme works like this: drm_dp_mst_port and drm_dp_mst_branch both have a single refcount. When this refcount hits 0 for either of the two, they're removed from the topology state, but not immediately freed. Both ports and branch devices will reinitialize their kref once it's hit 0 before actually destroying themselves. The intended purpose behind this is so that we can avoid problems like not being able to free a remote payload that might still be active, due to...

On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 03:15:34PM +0200, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote: > Add a topology description to the virtio-iommu driver and enable x86 > platforms. > > Since [v2] we have made some progress on adding ACPI support for > virtio-iommu, which is the preferred boot method on x86. It will be a > new vendor-agnostic table describing para-virtual topologies in a > m...

Hi, On 8/21/20 3:15 PM, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote: > Add a topology description to the virtio-iommu driver and enable x86 > platforms. > > Since [v2] we have made some progress on adding ACPI support for > virtio-iommu, which is the preferred boot method on x86. It will be a > new vendor-agnostic table describing para-virtual topologies in a > m...

...t.com > >You can reach the person managing the list at > libvirt-users-owner@redhat.com > >When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >than "Re: Contents of libvirt-users digest..." > > >Today's Topics: > > 1. Finding out CPU topology. (Peeyush Gupta) > 2. Re: Finding out CPU topology. (Daniel P. Berrange) > 3. Re: Finding out CPU topology. (Peeyush Gupta) > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >Message: 1 >Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 17:41:12 +0800 (SGT) >From: P...

Hi. I have following errors in my log file: Mar 22 05:33:11 xentest libvirtd: 05:33:11.518: error : failed Xen syscall topology cpuset syntax error Mar 22 05:33:21 xentest libvirtd: 05:33:21.418: error : failed Xen syscall topology cpuset syntax error Mar 22 05:33:41 xentest libvirtd: 05:33:41.274: error : failed Xen syscall topology cpuset syntax error Mar 22 05:33:41 xentest libvirtd: 05:33:41.323: error : failed Xen sys...

...ver the code and > seeing if things could be simplified. > > To the best of my understanding, the current scheme works like this: > drm_dp_mst_port and drm_dp_mst_branch both have a single refcount. When > this refcount hits 0 for either of the two, they're removed from the > topology state, but not immediately freed. Both ports and branch devices > will reinitialize their kref once it's hit 0 before actually destroying > themselves. The intended purpose behind this is so that we can avoid > problems like not being able to free a remote payload that might still &gt...

...mplified. > > > > > > To the best of my understanding, the current scheme works like this: > > > drm_dp_mst_port and drm_dp_mst_branch both have a single refcount. When > > > this refcount hits 0 for either of the two, they're removed from the > > > topology state, but not immediately freed. Both ports and branch devices > > > will reinitialize their kref once it's hit 0 before actually destroying > > > themselves. The intended purpose behind this is so that we can avoid > > > problems like not being able to free a remot...

...ing if things could be simplified. > > > > To the best of my understanding, the current scheme works like this: > > drm_dp_mst_port and drm_dp_mst_branch both have a single refcount. When > > this refcount hits 0 for either of the two, they're removed from the > > topology state, but not immediately freed. Both ports and branch devices > > will reinitialize their kref once it's hit 0 before actually destroying > > themselves. The intended purpose behind this is so that we can avoid > > problems like not being able to free a remote payload that...

...ithout anyone actually going over the code and seeing if things could be simplified. To the best of my understanding, the current scheme works like this: drm_dp_mst_port and drm_dp_mst_branch both have a single refcount. When this refcount hits 0 for either of the two, they're removed from the topology state, but not immediately freed. Both ports and branch devices will reinitialize their kref once it's hit 0 before actually destroying themselves. The intended purpose behind this is so that we can avoid problems like not being able to free a remote payload that might still be active, due to...

On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 10:48:06AM +0200, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote: > On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 03:15:34PM +0200, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote: > > Add a topology description to the virtio-iommu driver and enable x86 > > platforms. > > > > Since [v2] we have made some progress on adding ACPI support for > > virtio-iommu, which is the preferred boot method on x86. It will be a > > new vendor-agnostic table describing para-virtu...

On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 10:48:06AM +0200, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote: > On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 03:15:34PM +0200, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote: > > Add a topology description to the virtio-iommu driver and enable x86 > > platforms. > > > > Since [v2] we have made some progress on adding ACPI support for > > virtio-iommu, which is the preferred boot method on x86. It will be a > > new vendor-agnostic table describing para-virtu...

Platforms without device-tree nor ACPI can provide a topology description embedded into the virtio config space. Parse it. Use PCI FIXUP to probe the config space early, because we need to discover the topology before any DMA configuration takes place, and the virtio driver may be loaded much later. Since we discover the topology description when probing th...

Instead of storing the number of sockets, cores, and threads separately with the possibility to have each of them optional, store them together, so either we have a CPU topology or none. This slightly simplifies the handling of CPU topology. Most of the output modes/producers already considered a missing information of a topology as "1" when any of the other was specified, so the behaviour is unchanged. The only behaviour changes are when parsing, and creatin...

Hi Jean, On 8/21/20 3:15 PM, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote: > Platforms without device-tree nor ACPI can provide a topology > description embedded into the virtio config space. Parse it. > > Use PCI FIXUP to probe the config space early, because we need to > discover the topology before any DMA configuration takes place, and the > virtio driver may be loaded much later. Since we discover the topology &g...

...https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/lyudess/linux/commits/wip/mst-dual-kref-start-v4 Lyude Paul (16): drm/dp_mst: Rename drm_dp_mst_get_validated_(port|mstb)_ref and friends drm/dp_mst: Introduce new refcounting scheme for mstbs and ports drm/dp_mst: Restart last_connected_port_and_mstb() if topology ref fails drm/dp_mst: Stop releasing VCPI when removing ports from topology drm/dp_mst: Fix payload deallocation on hotplugs using malloc refs drm/i915: Keep malloc references to MST ports drm/amdgpu/display: Keep malloc ref to MST port drm/nouveau: Remove bogus cleanup in nv50_mstm_...

I try to assign 8 host cores to Windows 2003 Server Standard guest. Because this OS version has a limit of 4 sockets, I have to change the CPU topology. My guest definition: <vcpu>8</vcpu> <cpu match='minimum'> <model>core2duo</model> <topology sockets='4' cores='1' threads='2'/> </cpu> doesn't work as expected. I should have 4 CPUs in the Device Ma...