search for: toolbox01

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "toolbox01".

Did you mean: toolbox
Different behaviour of winbind in 4.8.3
2018 Jul 02
5
Different behaviour of winbind in 4.8.3
...ers) groups=1000513(SPREADSHIRT+domain users),1102339(SPREADSHIRT+tmutest),10001(BUILTIN+users) With Samba 4.8.3: # id tmutest uid=1102339(SPREADSHIRT+tmutest) gid=1000513(SPREADSHIRT+domain users) groups=1000513(SPREADSHIRT+domain users),1102339(SPREADSHIRT+tmutest),10001(BUILTIN+users) root at toolbox01 [lej] ~ # id SPREADSHIRT+tmutest uid=1102339(SPREADSHIRT+tmutest) gid=1000513(SPREADSHIRT+domain users) groups=1000513(SPREADSHIRT+domain users),1102339(SPREADSHIRT+tmutest),10001(BUILTIN+users) Is this intended? Is it possible to change the behaviour back to pre-4.8.3 by configuration change? Th...
Different behaviour of winbind in 4.8.3
2018 Jul 02
0
Different behaviour of winbind in 4.8.3
...,1102339(SPREADSHIRT+tmutest),10001(BUILTIN+users) > > > With Samba 4.8.3: > # id tmutest > uid=1102339(SPREADSHIRT+tmutest) gid=1000513(SPREADSHIRT+domain users) > groups=1000513(SPREADSHIRT+domain > users),1102339(SPREADSHIRT+tmutest),10001(BUILTIN+users) > > root at toolbox01 [lej] ~ # id SPREADSHIRT+tmutest > uid=1102339(SPREADSHIRT+tmutest) gid=1000513(SPREADSHIRT+domain users) > groups=1000513(SPREADSHIRT+domain > users),1102339(SPREADSHIRT+tmutest),10001(BUILTIN+users) > > Is this intended? > Is it possible to change the behaviour back to pre-4.8....
Different behaviour of winbind in 4.8.3
2018 Jul 02
0
Different behaviour of winbind in 4.8.3
...,1102339(SPREADSHIRT+tmutest),10001(BUILTIN+users) > > > With Samba 4.8.3: > # id tmutest > uid=1102339(SPREADSHIRT+tmutest) gid=1000513(SPREADSHIRT+domain users) > groups=1000513(SPREADSHIRT+domain > users),1102339(SPREADSHIRT+tmutest),10001(BUILTIN+users) > > root at toolbox01 [lej] ~ # id SPREADSHIRT+tmutest > uid=1102339(SPREADSHIRT+tmutest) gid=1000513(SPREADSHIRT+domain users) > groups=1000513(SPREADSHIRT+domain > users),1102339(SPREADSHIRT+tmutest),10001(BUILTIN+users) > > Is this intended? > Is it possible to change the behaviour back to pre-4.8....