Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "tomhugh".
Did you mean:
tomhughes
2018 Apr 05
2
can valgrind read LLD's debug info?
...hanging the default.
On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 2:50 PM Andrew Kelley via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Confirmed that -no-rosegment worked around the issue.
>
> However, a valgrind developer says that perhaps LLD is generating strange
> object files:
>
> <tomhughes> I suspect that is some extra ro segment in addition to the
> normal rodata
> <tomhughes> so without it you have two
> <tomhughes> but I know nothing about lld
> <tomhughes> but without an executable to examine/test it's hard to be sure
> <andrewrk> t...
2018 Apr 05
0
can valgrind read LLD's debug info?
Confirmed that -no-rosegment worked around the issue.
However, a valgrind developer says that perhaps LLD is generating strange
object files:
<tomhughes> I suspect that is some extra ro segment in addition to the
normal rodata
<tomhughes> so without it you have two
<tomhughes> but I know nothing about lld
<tomhughes> but without an executable to examine/test it's hard to be sure
<andrewrk> the not working elf file h...
2018 Apr 05
0
can valgrind read LLD's debug info?
...5, 2018 at 2:50 PM Andrew Kelley via llvm-dev <
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>> Confirmed that -no-rosegment worked around the issue.
>>
>> However, a valgrind developer says that perhaps LLD is generating strange
>> object files:
>>
>> <tomhughes> I suspect that is some extra ro segment in addition to the
>> normal rodata
>> <tomhughes> so without it you have two
>> <tomhughes> but I know nothing about lld
>> <tomhughes> but without an executable to examine/test it's hard to be sure
>>...
2018 Apr 05
2
can valgrind read LLD's debug info?
As a frontend, what are the downsides of enabling --no-rosegment by default?
So far the pro list is:
* valgrind debug info will work by default
What's on the con list?
On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 5:16 PM, Shoaib Meenai <smeenai at fb.com> wrote:
> It's more of a valgrind issue than an LLD issue, but you can work around
> it by linking with --no-rosegment
>
>
>
>