Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "tomcatvers".
Did you mean:
tomcat_versi
2012 May 02
4
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Odd PPC inline asm constraint
On Tue, 2012-05-01 at 19:58 -0500, Peter Bergner wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-05-01 at 17:47 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote:
> > By default it should build for
> > whatever the current host is (no special flags required). To
> > specifically build for something else, use:
> > -ccc-host-triple powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu
> > or
> > -ccc-host-triple
2005 Nov 06
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM versus Intel's PIN tool
Hello,
I am trying to decide between using LLVM and Intel's PIN
tool as the dynamic optimization tool for my PhD thesis.
Specifically, the tool I choose has to have the following
characteristics:
1. I should be able to run all the Spec 2000 and Spec 95 floating point
and integer benchmarks.
2. I should be able to instrument the beginning and end of specific
program regions (e.g.,
2012 May 02
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Odd PPC inline asm constraint
On Tue, 2012-05-01 at 17:47 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote:
> By default it should build for
> whatever the current host is (no special flags required). To
> specifically build for something else, use:
> -ccc-host-triple powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu
> or
> -ccc-host-triple powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu
So LLVM isn't biarch capable? Meaning one LLVM compiler cannot
generate both
2005 Nov 07
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM versus Intel's PIN tool
Hi Vasanth,
Can you be a little more precise about what you mean by "dynamic
optimization"? In one sense, neither LLVM nor Pin are dynamic optimization
tools per se - LLVM is more of a compiler(-building) suite while Pin is an
instrumentation toolkit.
> 1. I should be able to run all the Spec 2000 and Spec 95 floating point
> and integer benchmarks.
LLVM will do this - if it
2012 May 12
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Odd PPC inline asm constraint
On Tue, 01 May 2012 21:25:29 -0500
Peter Bergner <bergner at vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-05-01 at 19:58 -0500, Peter Bergner wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-05-01 at 17:47 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote:
> > > By default it should build for
> > > whatever the current host is (no special flags required). To
> > > specifically build for something else, use:
2012 May 01
4
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Odd PPC inline asm constraint
On Tue, 01 May 2012 17:23:07 -0500
Peter Bergner <bergner at vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-05-01 at 16:06 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote:
> > LLVM/clang now will build in the normal way (./configure; make
> > install) on PPC (you'll need at least the 3.1 release candidate (or
> > trunk)). I generally build on my PPC64 hosts with:
> > make ENABLE_OPTIMIZED=1