search for: tombston

On a particular DC, running 'samba-tool dbcheck' produces the following:     NOTICE: found 2 expired tombstones, 'samba' will remove them daily, 'samba-tool domain tombstones expunge' would do that immediately. When I run 'samba-tool domain tombstones expunge' the following is produced:     Removed 0 objects and 0 links successfully Running 'samba-tool dbcheck' again sh...

>> Did you think to run 'samba-tool domain tombstones expunge --help' ? No, I didn't, I just assumed that the message "'samba' will remove them daily, 'samba-tool domain tombstones expunge' would do that immediately" would mean exactly that :-). It worked now. Thank you!

On Mon, 8 Apr 2019 22:32:04 +0100 miguel medalha via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On a particular DC, running 'samba-tool dbcheck' produces the > following: > >     NOTICE: found 2 expired tombstones, 'samba' will remove them > daily, 'samba-tool domain tombstones expunge' would do that > immediately. > > When I run 'samba-tool domain tombstones expunge' the following is > produced: > >     Removed 0 objects and 0 links successfully > > R...

...verse zone (PTR records) We have one zone for VPN clients 8.0.10.in-addr.arpa. I activated the feature in the smb.conf as well as in the Windows DNS manager. Entries are deleted (not visible in DNS manager) after a while. You can still see them in ADSI-Edit. Those that are invisible have "dNSTombstoned: TRUE" set the others have either FALSE or the attribute is not there at all. My problem is this if an entry was deleted and has "dNSTombstoned: TRUE" it still has the same owner and therefore a new computer that got the same IP from our VPN gateway can not set this entry to point...

Hey all, has anyone done dcdiag against his DC yet? It's made from a windows client on command line: dcdiag /s:<servername> What are your results? With me some of the tests were not successful, e.g. ForestDNSDomain. My dcdiag is German so its output would not be so helpful for the mailing list. So somebody else can do a check to compare? Thanks in advance Tim

Hello, I receive the following when I attempt to expunge deleted tombstone records. I'm attempting to fix several dbcheck 'Not removing dangling forward link' errors. samba-tool domain tombstones expunge ERROR(<type 'exceptions.AttributeError'>): uncaught exception - 'module' object has no attribute 'time' File "/usr...

...f here i changed the pc name and ipnumbers to the correct ones. ? i now rejoin both pc's again. ? 1 pc works 1 not. ? The one that does not work is the one if i lookup in the DNS and AD again, Its just not there but the use is able to login. ? So, i wanted to clean up AD. samba-tool domain tombstones expunge Removed 0 objects and 0 links successfully ? 0 removed... and im pretty sure i remove about 5 pc's from the domain today. ? samba-tool dbcheck Checking 903 objects Checked 903 objects (0 errors) samba-tool dbcheck --cross-nc Checking 5135 objects Checked 5135 objects (0 errors) ?...

...i Song <maskray at google.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks for the write-up! >> >> >> >> >> >> On 2020-07-16, David Blaikie wrote: >> >> >> >In short: Perhaps we should switch lld to the bfd-style tombstoning >> >> >> >behavior for a release or two, letting users opt-in to testing with the new >> >> >> >-1/-2 tombstoning in the interim, before switching to the new tombstone by >> >> >> >default (while still having the flag to switch back...

Hi All, In general I think we should adopt Dave's plan here. The number of consumers that can (and have) been caught off guard by this change is just too high. At the very least I think we should move this to opt in to the new tombstoning behavior by default and at most migrate to bfd's behavior for both the current release and in the current tree. If we want to make this sort of change in the future by default I think we're going to need to provide release notes about this and do aggressive outreach towards the consumers...

On 10/26/2016 12:11 PM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Wed, 26 Oct 2016 11:41:23 -0400 > lingpanda101 via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I receive the following when I attempt to expunge deleted tombstone >> records. I'm attempting to fix several dbcheck 'Not removing dangling >> forward link' errors. >> >> samba-tool domain tombstones expunge >> ERROR(<type 'exceptions.AttributeError'>): uncaught exception - >> 'module' object h...

Dear list, Does anybody know how to lower the tombstone lifetime in samba 4.5 or later? There used to be a wiki entry, but this has been deleted as it is probably not adequate anymore: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Restoring_deleted_AD_objects#Changing_the_defaults_for_msDS-deletedObjectLifetime_and_tombstoneLifetime I used to change the attribute...

...org> wrote: >> >> Hi All, >> >> In general I think we should adopt Dave's plan here. The number of consumers that can (and have) been caught off guard by this change is just too high. >> >> At the very least I think we should move this to opt in to the new tombstoning behavior by default and at most migrate to bfd's behavior for both the current release and in the current tree. If we want to make this sort of change in the future by default I think we're going to need to provide release notes about this and do aggressive outreach towards the consumers...

...; >On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 12:03 AM Fangrui Song <maskray at google.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> Thanks for the write-up! >> >> >> >> On 2020-07-16, David Blaikie wrote: >> >> >In short: Perhaps we should switch lld to the bfd-style tombstoning >> >> >behavior for a release or two, letting users opt-in to testing with the new >> >> >-1/-2 tombstoning in the interim, before switching to the new tombstone by >> >> >default (while still having the flag to switch back when users find >> &g...

...> > > >> In general I think we should adopt Dave's plan here. The number of > consumers that can (and have) been caught off guard by this change is just > too high. > > >> > > >> At the very least I think we should move this to opt in to the new > tombstoning behavior by default and at most migrate to bfd's behavior for > both the current release and in the current tree. If we want to make this > sort of change in the future by default I think we're going to need to > provide release notes about this and do aggressive outreach toward...

...=campus,DC=sertao,DC=ifrs,DC=edu,DC=br - <GUID=650386f2-bc40-45ba-b652-222baa646a96>;CN=DC4\0ADEL:650386f2-bc40-45ba-b652-222baa646a96,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=campus,DC=sertao,DC=ifrs,DC=edu,DC=br Not removing dangling one-way link on deleted object (tombstone garbage collection in progress?) WARNING: parent object not found for CN=NTDS Settings\0ADEL:8161a0ff-3aa4-49e1-94fc-50d9299b1abd,CN=DC4\0ADEL:650386f2-bc40-45ba-b652-222baa646a96,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=campus,DC=sertao,DC=ifrs,DC=edu,DC=br Not moving to...

.../2016 12:11 PM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >>> On Wed, 26 Oct 2016 11:41:23 -0400 >>> lingpanda101 via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I receive the following when I attempt to expunge deleted tombstone >>>> records. I'm attempting to fix several dbcheck 'Not removing >>>> dangling forward link' errors. >>>> >>>> samba-tool domain tombstones expunge >>>> ERROR(<type 'exceptions.AttributeError'>): uncaught except...

...l at apple.com>; Jonas Devlieghere <jdevlieghere at apple.com>; James Henderson <jh7370.2008 at my.bristol.ac.uk>; Peter Smith <Peter.Smith at arm.com>; David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>; Pavel Labath <pavel at labath.sk> Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Switch to ld.bfd tombstone behavior by default Hi Ray :) While I understand the desire to say "we've updated everything we've found" the problem is that we don't know that we've found even much of the uses or can guarantee that people can upgrade, say their gdb or breakpad, as fast as their compi...

...Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>: > >On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 12:03 AM Fangrui Song < maskray at google.com > wrote: >> >> Thanks for the write-up! >> >> On 2020-07-16, David Blaikie wrote: >> >In short: Perhaps we should switch lld to the bfd-style tombstoning >> >behavior for a release or two, letting users opt-in to testing with the new >> >-1/-2 tombstoning in the interim, before switching to the new tombstone by >> >default (while still having the flag to switch back when users find >> >surprise places that can&...

On Wed, 26 Oct 2016 11:41:23 -0400 lingpanda101 via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello, > > I receive the following when I attempt to expunge deleted tombstone > records. I'm attempting to fix several dbcheck 'Not removing dangling > forward link' errors. > > samba-tool domain tombstones expunge > ERROR(<type 'exceptions.AttributeError'>): uncaught exception - > 'module' object has no attribute '...

...te: > On 10/26/2016 12:11 PM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > On Wed, 26 Oct 2016 11:41:23 -0400 > > lingpanda101 via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > >> Hello, > >> > >> I receive the following when I attempt to expunge deleted tombstone > >> records. I'm attempting to fix several dbcheck 'Not removing > >> dangling forward link' errors. > >> > >> samba-tool domain tombstones expunge > >> ERROR(<type 'exceptions.AttributeError'>): uncaught exception - > >...