search for: tomaszewski

...om the system to a smbd process owned by a user other than root. Still no closer to an answer Cheers ------------- Kristyan Osborne - IT Technician Longhill High School 01273 391672 -----Original Message----- From: Ken Innes [mailto:kinnes@ekos.com] Sent: Tue 04/03/2003 18:20 To: Lukasz Tomaszewski; Kristyan Osborne; Samba Users Cc: Subject: RE: [Samba] smaba 3.0 - domain groups : OS info I'm using Red Hat 7.3 on both the Samba 2.2.7 and 3.0 installations -Ken > -----Original Message----- > From: ?ukasz Tomaszewski [mailto:uki@telkab.pl] > Sent: Tuesday, March 0...

Hi, Im install Samba 4.1.9 (compiled from sources) with bind_dlz on Centos 6.5. Everything works fine. The problem is when I try to manage samba shares from windows, I don't see the security tab. Samba is run as root. To share sysvol and netlogon can enter and manage the security tab. Everything is ok. I've added a test test2 test3 shares When I want to get to share test test1 test2

Hi all, At the pre-big thanks to the SAMBA team for many years the great work. Sorry for my english. A week ago, have implemented productively Samba 4.1.5 on CentOS 6.5. I installed samba by default dns server built-in (internal) with the rfc2307. Everything works great, but after a while I noticed that the memory on my server is largely occupied. At this time there are about 10 users domain -

few day ago, i've asked about mapping unix-windows groups under samba 2.2.7a. now, i know that it is impossible. so i've changed samba on my PDC to 3.0 version (smbgroupedit). but still i've got problems with groups. before - from another machine when i've used 'wbinfo -g'i've got response from my PDC: Domain Admins Domain Users after change to samaba 3.0 with the

Am 03.07.2014 20:31, schrieb ?ukasz Tomaszewski: > Hi > I found your post on the Samba mailing lists. > https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2013-July/174680.html > > I have a similar problem. > My db / usr / local / samba / private / sam.ldb.d / DC = > DomainDnsZones, DC = DOMAIN, DC = LOCAL.ldb consumes now ~2,5GB > &...