search for: toasti

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13433 Bug ID: 13433 Summary: out_of_memory in receive_sums on large files Product: rsync Version: 3.1.3 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayned at samba.org Reporter:

I've been getting LOTS of messages like the below in the daily log, and from all indications, it appears to all be related to the cpu; the machine is just over a year old, and was the old vortex.wa4phy;net server from the downtown co-lo site. Aside from huge log files, and lots of other fluff, numerous problems of other nature have started cropping up. Anyone have any suggestions as to

On 02/04/2015 10:17 AM, James B. Byrne wrote: > I had a friend, now deceased, who worked as an RCA colour TV > technician when he was very young. In the 1950s he would be sent to > the homes of people having trouble adjusting the colour settings on > their new RCA's. That was system administration then. Who needs them > now? Broadcasters. You still need color balance chops

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3020 Summary: Mac OS X/Darwin incorrectly shows read sockets ready when they aren't Product: rsync Version: 2.6.5 Platform: PPC OS/Version: Mac OS X Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo:

All, Recently on an Ultra 10 running Solaris 8: -- SunOS toasty 5.8 Generic_108528-20 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-5_10, -- using a pre-compiled package of rsync 2.5.6 from sunfreeware.com: -- bash-2.03$ rsync --version rsync version 2.5.6 protocol version 26 Copyright (C) 1996-2002 by Andrew Tridgell and others <http://rsync.samba.org/> Capabilities: 64-bit files, socketpairs, hard links,

OK, so i''ve played a bit with mocks and mock_models in controller and view tests and i have a question. Is this statement really correct: "We highly recommend that you exploit the mock framework here rather than providing real model objects in order to keep the view specs isolated from changes to your models." (http://rspec.rubyforge.org/documentation/rails/writing/views.html

Hey, Tinc developers! I'm not sure if anyone else has brought this up, but we've got a rather good reason for using TCP, even though UDP will actually form a working connection. Anyone on Comcast's "small business" service is forced to use an SMC cable modem/router. Its NAT implementation is capable of letting tinc's UDP tunnels work fine, but they limit a single UDP

I've got a Cisco 7960 that I'm trying to convert to SIP. Here's what "Firmware Versions" says: App Load ID: P00305000300 Boot Load ID: PC03M030 Version: 5.0(3.0) The files that I have are: P003-07-1-00.sbn P003-07-1-00.bin P0S3-07-1-00.loads P0S3-07-1-00.sb2 If I put "P003-07-1-00" in OS79XX.TXT, the phone tries to tftp XMLDefault.cnf.xml. I've