search for: to_radeon_f

...uct radeon_ring ring[RADEON_NUM_RINGS]; > bool ib_pool_ready; > @@ -2358,11 +2360,6 @@ u32 cik_mm_rdoorbell(struct radeon_device > *rdev, u32 index); > void cik_mm_wdoorbell(struct radeon_device *rdev, u32 index, u32 v); > > /* > - * Cast helper > - */ > -#define to_radeon_fence(p) ((struct radeon_fence *)(p)) > - > -/* > * Registers read & write functions. > */ > #define RREG8(reg) readb((rdev->rmmio) + (reg)) > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_device.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_device.c > index 03686fab842d..86699...

op 09-07-14 14:57, Deucher, Alexander schreef: >> <snip> >> +static const char *radeon_fence_get_timeline_name(struct fence *f) >> +{ >> + struct radeon_fence *fence = to_radeon_fence(f); >> + switch (fence->ring) { >> + case RADEON_RING_TYPE_GFX_INDEX: return "radeon.gfx"; >> + case CAYMAN_RING_TYPE_CP1_INDEX: return "radeon.cp1"; >> + case CAYMAN_RING_TYPE_CP2_INDEX: return "radeon.cp2"; >> + case R600_RING_TYP...

...e_context; struct mutex ring_lock; struct radeon_ring ring[RADEON_NUM_RINGS]; bool ib_pool_ready; @@ -2358,11 +2360,6 @@ u32 cik_mm_rdoorbell(struct radeon_device *rdev, u32 index); void cik_mm_wdoorbell(struct radeon_device *rdev, u32 index, u32 v); /* - * Cast helper - */ -#define to_radeon_fence(p) ((struct radeon_fence *)(p)) - -/* * Registers read & write functions. */ #define RREG8(reg) readb((rdev->rmmio) + (reg)) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_device.c index 03686fab842d..86699df7c8f3 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rad...

...e_context; struct mutex ring_lock; struct radeon_ring ring[RADEON_NUM_RINGS]; bool ib_pool_ready; @@ -2346,11 +2348,6 @@ u32 cik_mm_rdoorbell(struct radeon_device *rdev, u32 index); void cik_mm_wdoorbell(struct radeon_device *rdev, u32 index, u32 v); /* - * Cast helper - */ -#define to_radeon_fence(p) ((struct radeon_fence *)(p)) - -/* * Registers read & write functions. */ #define RREG8(reg) readb((rdev->rmmio) + (reg)) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_device.c index 0e770bbf7e29..501d0cf9eb8b 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rad...

Am 19.05.2014 15:35, schrieb Maarten Lankhorst: > op 19-05-14 14:30, Christian K?nig schreef: >> Am 19.05.2014 12:10, schrieb Maarten Lankhorst: >>> op 19-05-14 10:27, Christian K?nig schreef: >>>> Am 19.05.2014 10:00, schrieb Maarten Lankhorst: >>>> [SNIP] >>>> The problem here is that the whole approach collides with the way >>>>

...ext; struct mutex ring_lock; struct radeon_ring ring[RADEON_NUM_RINGS]; bool ib_pool_ready; @@ -2346,11 +2348,6 @@ u32 cik_mm_rdoorbell(struct radeon_device *rdev, u32 index); void cik_mm_wdoorbell(struct radeon_device *rdev, u32 index, u32 v); /* - * Cast helper - */ -#define to_radeon_fence(p) ((struct radeon_fence *)(p)) - -/* * Registers read & write functions. */ #define RREG8(reg) readb((rdev->rmmio) + (reg)) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_device.c index 0e770bbf7e29..6800a0f6dd33 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/...

...ring[RADEON_NUM_RINGS]; > bool ib_pool_ready; > @@ -2346,11 +2348,6 @@ u32 cik_mm_rdoorbell(struct radeon_device > *rdev, u32 index); > void cik_mm_wdoorbell(struct radeon_device *rdev, u32 index, u32 v); > > /* > - * Cast helper > - */ > -#define to_radeon_fence(p) ((struct radeon_fence *)(p)) > - > -/* > * Registers read & write functions. > */ > #define RREG8(reg) readb((rdev->rmmio) + (reg)) > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_device.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_device.c > index 0e770bbf7e29..6800...

...;>>> well, so this part makes sense. >>>>>> >>>>>>> +static long __radeon_fence_wait(struct fence *f, bool intr, >>>>>>> long timeout) >>>>>>> +{ >>>>>>> + struct radeon_fence *fence = to_radeon_fence(f); >>>>>>> + u64 target_seq[RADEON_NUM_RINGS] = {}; >>>>>>> + >>>>>>> + target_seq[fence->ring] = fence->seq; >>>>>>> + return radeon_fence_wait_seq_timeout(fence->rdev, >>>>>&...

...uct radeon_ring ring[RADEON_NUM_RINGS]; > bool ib_pool_ready; > @@ -2346,11 +2348,6 @@ u32 cik_mm_rdoorbell(struct radeon_device *rdev, u32 index); > void cik_mm_wdoorbell(struct radeon_device *rdev, u32 index, u32 v); > > /* > - * Cast helper > - */ > -#define to_radeon_fence(p) ((struct radeon_fence *)(p)) > - > -/* > * Registers read & write functions. > */ > #define RREG8(reg) readb((rdev->rmmio) + (reg)) > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_device.c > index 0e770bbf7e29..501d0cf...

...list for quite some time as well, so this part makes sense. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> +static long __radeon_fence_wait(struct fence *f, bool intr, long timeout) >>>>>>>> +{ >>>>>>>> + struct radeon_fence *fence = to_radeon_fence(f); >>>>>>>> + u64 target_seq[RADEON_NUM_RINGS] = {}; >>>>>>>> + >>>>>>>> + target_seq[fence->ring] = fence->seq; >>>>>>>> + return radeon_fence_wait_seq_timeout(fence->rdev, target...

...ring[RADEON_NUM_RINGS]; > bool ib_pool_ready; > @@ -2346,11 +2348,6 @@ u32 cik_mm_rdoorbell(struct radeon_device > *rdev, u32 index); > void cik_mm_wdoorbell(struct radeon_device *rdev, u32 index, u32 v); > > /* > - * Cast helper > - */ > -#define to_radeon_fence(p) ((struct radeon_fence *)(p)) > - > -/* > * Registers read & write functions. > */ > #define RREG8(reg) readb((rdev->rmmio) + (reg)) > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_device.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_device.c > index 0e770bbf7e29..19c6...

...hanks, >> Christian. > > Does this modification look sane? Adding the timeout is on my todo list for quite some time as well, so this part makes sense. > +static long __radeon_fence_wait(struct fence *f, bool intr, long > timeout) > +{ > + struct radeon_fence *fence = to_radeon_fence(f); > + u64 target_seq[RADEON_NUM_RINGS] = {}; > + > + target_seq[fence->ring] = fence->seq; > + return radeon_fence_wait_seq_timeout(fence->rdev, target_seq, > intr, timeout); > +} When this call is comming from outside the radeon driver you need to lock r...

...on look sane? >> Adding the timeout is on my todo list for quite some time as well, so >> this part makes sense. >> >>> +static long __radeon_fence_wait(struct fence *f, bool intr, long >>> timeout) >>> +{ >>> + struct radeon_fence *fence = to_radeon_fence(f); >>> + u64 target_seq[RADEON_NUM_RINGS] = {}; >>> + >>> + target_seq[fence->ring] = fence->seq; >>> + return radeon_fence_wait_seq_timeout(fence->rdev, target_seq, >>> intr, timeout); >>> +} >> When this call is c...

Am 15.05.2014 11:38, schrieb Maarten Lankhorst: > op 15-05-14 11:21, Christian K?nig schreef: >> Am 15.05.2014 03:06, schrieb Maarten Lankhorst: >>> op 14-05-14 17:29, Christian K?nig schreef: >>>>> + /* did fence get signaled after we enabled the sw irq? */ >>>>> + if >>>>>

...my todo list for quite some time as well, >>>> so this part makes sense. >>>> >>>>> +static long __radeon_fence_wait(struct fence *f, bool intr, long >>>>> timeout) >>>>> +{ >>>>> + struct radeon_fence *fence = to_radeon_fence(f); >>>>> + u64 target_seq[RADEON_NUM_RINGS] = {}; >>>>> + >>>>> + target_seq[fence->ring] = fence->seq; >>>>> + return radeon_fence_wait_seq_timeout(fence->rdev, target_seq, >>>>> intr, timeout); >...

...ian. >> >> Does this modification look sane? > Adding the timeout is on my todo list for quite some time as well, so this part makes sense. > >> +static long __radeon_fence_wait(struct fence *f, bool intr, long timeout) >> +{ >> + struct radeon_fence *fence = to_radeon_fence(f); >> + u64 target_seq[RADEON_NUM_RINGS] = {}; >> + >> + target_seq[fence->ring] = fence->seq; >> + return radeon_fence_wait_seq_timeout(fence->rdev, target_seq, intr, timeout); >> +} > When this call is comming from outside the radeon driver...

...cation look sane? >>> Adding the timeout is on my todo list for quite some time as well, so this part makes sense. >>> >>>> +static long __radeon_fence_wait(struct fence *f, bool intr, long timeout) >>>> +{ >>>> + struct radeon_fence *fence = to_radeon_fence(f); >>>> + u64 target_seq[RADEON_NUM_RINGS] = {}; >>>> + >>>> + target_seq[fence->ring] = fence->seq; >>>> + return radeon_fence_wait_seq_timeout(fence->rdev, target_seq, intr, timeout); >>>> +} >>> When this...

...dding the timeout is on my todo list for quite some time as well, so this part makes sense. >>>>> >>>>>> +static long __radeon_fence_wait(struct fence *f, bool intr, long timeout) >>>>>> +{ >>>>>> + struct radeon_fence *fence = to_radeon_fence(f); >>>>>> + u64 target_seq[RADEON_NUM_RINGS] = {}; >>>>>> + >>>>>> + target_seq[fence->ring] = fence->seq; >>>>>> + return radeon_fence_wait_seq_timeout(fence->rdev, target_seq, intr, timeout); >>&g...

...false, MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT); + if (r < 0) { if (r == -EDEADLK) return -EDEADLK; @@ -908,6 +927,15 @@ int radeon_debugfs_fence_init(struct radeon_device *rdev) #endif } +static long __radeon_fence_wait(struct fence *f, bool intr, long timeout) +{ + struct radeon_fence *fence = to_radeon_fence(f); + u64 target_seq[RADEON_NUM_RINGS] = {}; + + target_seq[fence->ring] = fence->seq; + return radeon_fence_wait_seq_timeout(fence->rdev, target_seq, intr, timeout); +} + static const char *radeon_fence_get_driver_name(struct fence *fence) { return "radeon"; @@ -932,6...

This series applies on top of the driver-core-next branch of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/driver-core.git Before converting ttm to the new fence interface I had to fix some drivers to require a reservation before poking with fence_obj. After flipping the switch RCU becomes available instead, and the extra reservations can be dropped again. :-) I've done at least basic