search for: to_find

...ess_zero(&port->topology_kref); + + if (ret) + DRM_DEBUG("port %p (%d)\n", port, + kref_read(&port->topology_kref)); + + return ret; } -static struct drm_dp_mst_branch *drm_dp_mst_get_validated_mstb_ref_locked(struct drm_dp_mst_branch *mstb, struct drm_dp_mst_branch *to_find) +/** + * drm_dp_mst_topology_ref_port() - Increment the topology refcount of a port + * @port: The &struct drm_dp_mst_port to increment the topology refcount of + * + * Increments @port.topology_refcount without checking whether or not it's + * already reached 0. This is only valid to use...

...> + if (ret) > + DRM_DEBUG("port %p (%d)\n", port, > + kref_read(&port->topology_kref)); > + > + return ret; > } > > -static struct drm_dp_mst_branch *drm_dp_mst_get_validated_mstb_ref_locked(struct drm_dp_mst_branch *mstb, struct drm_dp_mst_branch *to_find) > +/** > + * drm_dp_mst_topology_ref_port() - Increment the topology refcount of a port > + * @port: The &struct drm_dp_mst_port to increment the topology refcount of > + * > + * Increments @port.topology_refcount without checking whether or not it's > + * already reached...

...ort(struct drm_dp_mst_port *port) +static void drm_dp_mst_topology_put_port(struct drm_dp_mst_port *port) { kref_put(&port->kref, drm_dp_destroy_port); } -static struct drm_dp_mst_branch *drm_dp_mst_get_validated_mstb_ref_locked(struct drm_dp_mst_branch *mstb, struct drm_dp_mst_branch *to_find) +static struct drm_dp_mst_branch * +drm_dp_mst_topology_get_mstb_validated_locked(struct drm_dp_mst_branch *mstb, + struct drm_dp_mst_branch *to_find) { struct drm_dp_mst_port *port; struct drm_dp_mst_branch *rmstb; @@ -985,7 +987,8 @@ static struct drm_dp_mst_branch *drm_dp_mst_get...

...kref_read(&port->topology_kref)); > > > + > > > + return ret; > > > } > > > > > > -static struct drm_dp_mst_branch > > > *drm_dp_mst_get_validated_mstb_ref_locked(struct drm_dp_mst_branch *mstb, > > > struct drm_dp_mst_branch *to_find) > > > +/** > > > + * drm_dp_mst_topology_ref_port() - Increment the topology refcount of a > > > port > > > + * @port: The &struct drm_dp_mst_port to increment the topology refcount > > > of > > > + * > > > + * Increments @port.top...

...%d)\n", port, > > + kref_read(&port->topology_kref)); > > + > > + return ret; > > } > > > > -static struct drm_dp_mst_branch > > *drm_dp_mst_get_validated_mstb_ref_locked(struct drm_dp_mst_branch *mstb, > > struct drm_dp_mst_branch *to_find) > > +/** > > + * drm_dp_mst_topology_ref_port() - Increment the topology refcount of a > > port > > + * @port: The &struct drm_dp_mst_port to increment the topology refcount > > of > > + * > > + * Increments @port.topology_refcount without checking whe...

...topology_kref) - 1); + kref_put(&port->topology_kref, drm_dp_destroy_port); } static struct drm_dp_mst_branch * @@ -981,10 +1282,10 @@ drm_dp_mst_topology_get_mstb_validated_locked(struct drm_dp_mst_branch *mstb, { struct drm_dp_mst_port *port; struct drm_dp_mst_branch *rmstb; - if (to_find == mstb) { - kref_get(&mstb->kref); + + if (to_find == mstb) return mstb; - } + list_for_each_entry(port, &mstb->ports, next) { if (port->mstb) { rmstb = drm_dp_mst_topology_get_mstb_validated_locked( @@ -1001,25 +1302,32 @@ drm_dp_mst_topology_get_mstb_validated(struc...

...topology_kref) - 1); + kref_put(&port->topology_kref, drm_dp_destroy_port); } static struct drm_dp_mst_branch * @@ -981,10 +1282,10 @@ drm_dp_mst_topology_get_mstb_validated_locked(struct drm_dp_mst_branch *mstb, { struct drm_dp_mst_port *port; struct drm_dp_mst_branch *rmstb; - if (to_find == mstb) { - kref_get(&mstb->kref); + + if (to_find == mstb) return mstb; - } + list_for_each_entry(port, &mstb->ports, next) { if (port->mstb) { rmstb = drm_dp_mst_topology_get_mstb_validated_locked( @@ -1001,25 +1302,32 @@ drm_dp_mst_topology_get_mstb_validated(struc...

...- (Year == 0 & Zone == 1) Position <- cbind(Longitude - 143, Latitude) dimnames(Position)[[2]][1] <- "Longitude - 143" sm.regression(Longitude, Score1, method = "aicc", col = "red",_ model = "linear") Could someone please give some hints_on the way to_find the derivative_on the curve at_some points ? Thank you. Kagba ================================================ In the message headers I see: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable and, on inspection of the message text in the &qu...

This is a WIP version of the series I've been working on for a while now to get all of the atomic DRM drivers in the tree to use the atomic MST helpers, and to make the atomic MST helpers actually idempotent. Turns out it's a lot more difficult to do that without also fixing how port and branch device refcounting works so that it actually makes sense, since the current upstream

This is the series I've been working on for a while now to get all of the atomic DRM drivers in the tree to use the atomic MST helpers, and to make the atomic MST helpers actually idempotent. Turns out it's a lot more difficult to do that without also fixing how port and branch device refcounting works so that it actually makes sense, since the current upstream implementation requires a

This is the series I've been working on for a while now to get all of the atomic DRM drivers in the tree to use the atomic MST helpers, and to make the atomic MST helpers actually idempotent. Turns out it's a lot more difficult to do that without also fixing how port and branch device refcounting works so that it actually makes sense, since the current upstream implementation requires a

This is the series I've been working on for a while now to get all of the atomic DRM drivers in the tree to use the atomic MST helpers, and to make the atomic MST helpers actually idempotent. Turns out it's a lot more difficult to do that without also fixing how port and branch device refcounting works so that it actually makes sense, since the current upstream implementation requires a

This is the series I've been working on for a while now to get all of the atomic DRM drivers in the tree to use the atomic MST helpers, and to make the atomic MST helpers actually idempotent. Turns out it's a lot more difficult to do that without also fixing how port and branch device refcounting works so that it actually makes sense, since the current upstream implementation requires a

This is the series I've been working on for a while now to get all of the atomic DRM drivers in the tree to use the atomic MST helpers, and to make the atomic MST helpers actually idempotent. Turns out it's a lot more difficult to do that without also fixing how port and branch device refcounting works so that it actually makes sense, since the current upstream implementation requires a

This is the series I've been working on for a while now to get all of the atomic DRM drivers in the tree to use the atomic MST helpers, and to make the atomic MST helpers actually idempotent. Turns out it's a lot more difficult to do that without also fixing how port and branch device refcounting works so that it actually makes sense, since the current upstream implementation requires a

This patchset does some cleaning up of the atomic VCPI helpers for MST, and converts nouveau over to using them. I would have included amdgpu in this patch as well, but at the moment moving them over to the atomic helpers is nontrivial. [sorry for still not adding your R-Bs! I ended up needing to make a lot of changes to make it so we do actually kref() each port in the atomic state] Cc: Daniel