search for: to_dos

...@from = "accounts@mywebsite.com" @subject = title @body = body # breakpoint ''mailer'' # Email body substitutions go here end end In the controller I have; ... # Send the Email @recipient = Person.find(:first, :conditions => [''id = ?'',@to_dos.user_id]) @email_address = @recipient.email_address ItemMailer::create_item_assignment(@email_address, @to_dos.title, @to_dos.body) ... I dont need any fancy stuff like variable substitution, just a way to pop the recipient, subject and body into an email object. When I try to run this I get...

Hi, I''m trying to set up file_column to upload attachments for emails. My view has <td align="left"><%= file_column_field ''to_do'', ''attachment'' %></td> and the attachment_temp hidden field is generated. When I inspect tthe params on saving the form the attachment_temp param is always an empty string. Also, when I was

This patch should fix the bug reported in https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/11/249. Test is still pending. David Hildenbrand (1): blk-mq: Avoid race condition with uninitialized requests block/blk-mq.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) -- 1.8.5.5

This patch should fix the bug reported in https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/11/249. Test is still pending. David Hildenbrand (1): blk-mq: Avoid race condition with uninitialized requests block/blk-mq.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) -- 1.8.5.5

Hi We are having some problems - the majority of our files require ascii transfers between our unix servers and PCs. They are however being transferred as binary for some reason even though they are just plain text files. This means (when going from unix to pc) the files come down without a carriage return at the end of lines. And when going from pc to unix they end up with ^M on the end of each

> >>> Does anyone have an idea? > >>> The request itself is completely filled with cc > >> > >> That is very weird, the 'rq' is got from hctx->tags, and rq should be > >> valid, and rq->q shouldn't have been changed even though it was > >> double free or double allocation. > >> > >>> I am currently

> >>> Does anyone have an idea? > >>> The request itself is completely filled with cc > >> > >> That is very weird, the 'rq' is got from hctx->tags, and rq should be > >> valid, and rq->q shouldn't have been changed even though it was > >> double free or double allocation. > >> > >>> I am currently

This patch should fix the bug reported in https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/11/249. We have to initialize at least the atomic_flags and the cmd_flags when allocating storage for the requests. Otherwise blk_mq_timeout_check() might dereference uninitialized pointers when racing with the creation of a request. Also move the reset of cmd_flags for the initializing code to the point where a request is

On 09/18/2014 11:04 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote: > This patch should fix the bug reported in https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/11/249. > > We have to initialize at least the atomic_flags and the cmd_flags when > allocating storage for the requests. > > Otherwise blk_mq_timeout_check() might dereference uninitialized pointers when > racing with the creation of a request. >

On 09/18/2014 11:04 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote: > This patch should fix the bug reported in https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/11/249. > > We have to initialize at least the atomic_flags and the cmd_flags when > allocating storage for the requests. > > Otherwise blk_mq_timeout_check() might dereference uninitialized pointers when > racing with the creation of a request. >

On 2014-09-17 07:52, Ming Lei wrote: > On Wed, 17 Sep 2014 14:00:34 +0200 > David Hildenbrand <dahi at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > >>>>>> Does anyone have an idea? >>>>>> The request itself is completely filled with cc >>>>> >>>>> That is very weird, the 'rq' is got from hctx->tags, and rq should be

On 2014-09-17 07:52, Ming Lei wrote: > On Wed, 17 Sep 2014 14:00:34 +0200 > David Hildenbrand <dahi at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > >>>>>> Does anyone have an idea? >>>>>> The request itself is completely filled with cc >>>>> >>>>> That is very weird, the 'rq' is got from hctx->tags, and rq should be

Hi all, I need the power of R from within some of my Python programs... I use debian linux (woody) at home and windows XP at work (the latter is where I need to get things done!) This are my packages: R 1.8.0 Python 2.3 RSPython 0.5-3 This is what I've done: (1) Since the Windows Binary of RSPython is compiled against Python 2.2 I downloaded the tarball (2) Followed the instructions in

RHSrvAny.c was using a mixture of 4 space indentation, and tabs with a width of 4. This commit rationalises the whitespace to use only 4 space indentation, and removes trailing whitespace. --- RHSrvAny/RHSrvAny.c | 537 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------- RHSrvAny/RHSrvAny.h | 1 - RHSrvAny/resource.h | 2 +- 3 files changed, 269 insertions(+), 271 deletions(-) diff --git

RHSrvAny.c was using a mixture of 4 space indentation, and tabs with a width of 4. This commit rationalises the whitespace to use only 4 space indentation, and removes trailing whitespace. --- RHSrvAny/RHSrvAny.c | 537 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------- RHSrvAny/RHSrvAny.h | 1 - RHSrvAny/resource.h | 2 +- 3 files changed, 269 insertions(+), 271 deletions(-) diff --git

Hello, If I rename a directory full of files, or a bunch of files, and I use Rsync to update the directory tree, Rsync will upload all these files again and delete the old ones. This is suboptimal since all the data is already there. Rsync should be able to check for renamed files by scanning for files with the same MD5 hashes, checksums, or delta signatures (is that what you called them?).

OK here's the problem: when i use the "smbpasswd" program it doesn't update the "passwd" file in /etc. What i want: The explicate conditions in which Samba to Unix password syncing will operate correctly on a Red Hat 7.0 (Guiness) distro with samba 2.0.7-21ssl (included in distro) IE: perrmissions on passwd and smbpasswd files, password program = ?, password chat =

How the hell do you close em off after the action is completed? Ta, Eric

The newly rebuilt RHSrvAny worked on Windows XP, Windows 2003 R2, and Windows Vista+, but segfaulted on Windows 2003. After much investigation, the issue seems to have been with inconsistent use of Unicode. This series fixes compilation on Microsoft Visual C++ 2010 (the most recent version which runs on Windows 2003), fixes all compiler warnings, and enabled warnings during the build. The

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98039 Bug ID: 98039 Summary: KMail crash on starting (nouveau-related) Product: Mesa Version: git Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: medium Component: Drivers/DRI/nouveau Assignee: