search for: to2

...ata= c( stackData, ...)) }, stackIt2 = function( ...) { tmp= c( stackData, ...) testClass( stackData= tmp) }, getStack = function() { stackData }, NULL ) } to1= testClass() for( i in 4:2) { to1= to1$stackIt1( i) } print( all( rep( 2, 3) == to1$getStack())) # error! to2= testClass() for( i in 4:2) { to2= to2$stackIt2( i) } print( all( 4:2 == to2$getStack())) # correct! # what ist the difference between stackIt1 and stackIt2? # (error appears only by using an for loop) " > version _ platform i486-pc-linux-gnu arch i486 os li...

...estmsg_bodystructure) == 0 imap bodystructure parser ............................................ : FAILED because the ?env-to? field of the envelope structure of the encapsulated MESSAGE/RFC822 message is printed as ((NIL NIL "sub-to1" "domain.org") (NIL NIL "sub-to2" "domain.org")) while it should be ((NIL NIL "sub-to1" "domain.org")(NIL NIL "sub-to2" "domain.org")) After a quick look at the source, this seems to be due to src/lib-imap/imap-bodystructure.c:imap_write_list, which always separates lis...

...pconnect/${to1},120,M(c2cmacro-connect^${ARG1}^to1)) exten => s,n(lbl_macro-c2cmacro-p1_1),MacroExit() exten => s,n(lbl_macro-c2cmacro-p1_2),Hangup() exten => h,1,MeetMeAdmin(8000,K) exten => h,n,Goto(s,lbl_macro-c2cmacro-p1_1) [macro-c2cmacro-p2] exten => s,n,Dial(SIP/sipconnect/${to2},120,M(c2cmacro-connect^${ARG1}^to2)) exten => s,n(lbl_macro-c2cmacro-p2_1),MacroExit() exten => s,n(lbl_macro-c2cmacro-p2_2),Hangup() exten => h,1,MeetMeAdmin(8000,K) exten => h,n,Goto(s,lbl_macro-c2cmacro-p2_1) [macro-c2cmacro-connect] exten => s,n,Set(TIMEOUT(absolute)=120) exte...

...me bit manipulation to achieve the same thing. Regards Arthur? On 2012?3?14?, at ??11:21, Mashal al-shboul <shboul8989 at yahoo.com> wrote: ??? Hi All, >I would like to get your help in my problem, > > >we know that Speex codec takes samples of type short (signed), range:-2^15 to2^15 -1 , my problem is that i have samples of type > >unsigned short ,range: 0 to 2^16 -1. so, what should i do in order to apply speex on my unsigned samples ?. > >???? There is? a proposed solution to subtract 2^15-1 from each unsigned short to get it signed short, my question: is thi...

...sent 29267 bytes received 37 bytes 58608.00 bytes/sec total size is 117396 speedup is 4.01 No differences encountered .f...p..... foo/config1 >f..t...... foo/config2 No differences encountered sending incremental file list created directory /scratch/bfriesen/build/rsync-3.0.0/testtmp/itemize/to2 delta-transmission disabled for local transfer or --whole-file cd ./ cd bar/ cd bar/baz/ cf bar/baz/rsync cd foo/ cf foo/config1 cf foo/config2 hf foo/extra => foo/config1 cL foo/sym -> ../bar/baz/rsync total: ma...

...ether this nation, or any nation, can long endure. Wrie agre hmet tona [grea2t; b3attlef1iHeld( of Cthat war. We) hve come [to2 dedi;c3ate5 a portioHn of1 that fi9el9d, 4as a f-inal2 r0e1sting3 la[c2e; for4 th5osHe whoH her.e ave thei[r li2ves ;t4h8at HthaPt naetitoen mirghtl[ive2.; It 5is4 altogether...

I am able to get this script to dial, but I am unable to talk or hear anything. The script asks for the number to call and the the caller id to display (if user is not at their normal extension). Once submitted, the external extension receives a call, once answered the call is then placed to the dentition number. The script works as the call is place, but I cannot hear or say anything. Any one

...+49 6101 806 590 mobil: +49 175 2968579 E-Mail: thorsten.mueller@materna.de http://www.materna.com * http://www.materna.de - -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com> iQA/AwUBPsJFbtgohzamlZnzEQKJPgCfWW8l1taw3yKmOZ3omm15an+imy0AnR+E TO2+sHfabs/KJOORQ8sdpMxB =7+Q6 - -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com> iQA/AwUBPsJbV9gohzamlZnzEQKsfACfTXNYQGRYNxYpBtHCppJYIpEfUx8AoIrt Qo9ChDg/aljv9eqZdOlnxkf8 =VGO2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

...gt; > Regards > Arthur > > On 2012?3?14?, at ??11:21, Mashal al-shboul <shboul8989 at yahoo.com> wrote: > >> Hi All, >> I would like to get your help in my problem, >> >> we know that Speex codec takes samples of type short (signed), range:-2^15 to2^15 -1 , my problem is that i have samples of type >> unsigned short ,range: 0 to 2^16 -1. so, what should i do in order to apply speex on my unsigned samples ?. >> There is a proposed solution to subtract 2^15-1 from each unsigned short to get it signed short, my question: is thi...

...gt; >Regards >Arthur? > >On 2012?3?14?, at ??11:21, Mashal al-shboul <shboul8989 at yahoo.com> wrote: > > >??? Hi All, >>I would like to get your help in my problem, >> >> >>we know that Speex codec takes samples of type short (signed), range:-2^15 to2^15 -1 , my problem is that i have samples of type >> >>unsigned short ,range: 0 to 2^16 -1. so, what should i do in order to apply speex on my unsigned samples ?. >> >>???? There is? a proposed solution to subtract 2^15-1 from each unsigned short to get it signed short, my...

...ether this nation, or any nation, can long endure. Wrie agre hmet tona [grea2t; b3attlef1iHeld( of Cthat war. We) hve come [to2 dedi;c3ate5 a portioHn of1 that fi9el9d, 4as a f-inal2 r0e1sting3 la[c2e; for4 th5osHe whoH her.e ave thei[r li2ves ;t4h8at HthaPt naetitoen mirghtl[ive2.; It 5is4 altogether...

...;> Arthur >> >> On 2012?3?14?, at ??11:21, Mashal al-shboul <shboul8989 at yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> ??? Hi All, >> I would like to get your help in my problem, >> >> we know that Speex codec takes samples of type short (signed), range:-2^15 >> to2^15 -1 , my problem is that i have samples of type >> unsigned short ,range: 0 to 2^16 -1. so, what should i do in order to >> apply >> speex on my unsigned samples ?. >> ???? There is? a proposed solution to subtract 2^15-1 from each unsigned >> short to get it signed...

Hi! Before Rails 2.0 is coming, I suggest not to make CookieStore the default session storage. It stores clear-text values on the client-side and the integrity check hash can be brute-force attacked. I understand that this has been set due to speed advantages, but I believe it''s better to make better security a default. I''ve written a blog post about this

Hello list. I'm trying to rebuild the 2.6.9.67.0.20.EL kernel, but it fails even without modifications. How did I try it? Created a (non-root) build environment (not a mock ) Installed the kernel.scr.rpm and did a rpmbuild -ba --target=`uname -m` kernel-2.6.spec 2> prep-err.log | tee prep-out.log The build failed at the end: Processing files: kernel-xenU-devel-2.6.9-67.0.20.EL Checking