Displaying 11 results from an estimated 11 matches for "tms320vc5510".
2006 Dec 05
1
Speex support for TI DaVinci processor
...continuously samples a mic, encodes it in Speex format, and give it to the application on the ARM side via the shared memory; on the inbound flow (from ARM), the DSP gets encoded Speex data via the shared memory, decodes it and then plays it to the speaker.
I know there's a Speex port for the TMS320VC5510 but will that port work for the C64xx series? Thanks.
Regards
Andy
----- Original Message ----
From: Jerry Trantow <jtrantow@ieee.org>
To: ndno72-speex@yahoo.com; speex-dev@xiph.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 5, 2006 1:55:13 PM
Subject: RE: [Speex-dev] Speex support for TI DaVinci processor...
2007 Jan 04
3
Speex support for TI DaVinci processor
...ic, encodes it in Speex format, and give it
> to the application on the ARM side via the shared memory; on the
> inbound flow (from ARM), the DSP gets encoded Speex data via the
> shared memory, decodes it and then plays it to the speaker.
>
> I know there's a Speex port for the TMS320VC5510 but will that port
> work for the C64xx series? Thanks.
>
> Regards Andy
>
> ----- Original Message ---- From: Jerry Trantow <jtrantow@ieee.org>
> To: ndno72-speex@yahoo.com; speex-dev@xiph.org Sent: Tuesday,
> December 5, 2006 1:55:13 PM Subject: RE: [Speex-dev] Spee...
2006 Dec 05
1
Speex support for TI DaVinci processor
Hi,
My company just recently bought a TI DaVinci development board and I'm trying to port Speex to run on it. The TI DaVinci chip has an ARM926 processor and a TMS320C64+ DSP in it. I was able to get Speex somewhat working on a TMS320VC5510 about a year ago but I was wondering is there anything special I need to do to get Speex working on the TMS320C64+ DSP in the DaVinci chip. I appreciate any insight or comment you may give me or point me to sites where I can get more information. Thanks in advance!
Andy
-------------- next part...
2006 Dec 05
2
Speex support for TI DaVinci processor
Hi,
My company just recently bought a TI DaVinci development board and I'm trying to port Speex to run on it. The TI DaVinci chip has an ARM926 processor and a TMS320C64+ DSP in it. I was able to get Speex somewhat working on a TMS320VC5510 about a year ago but I was wondering is there anything special I need to do to get Speex working on the TMS320C64+ DSP in the DaVinci chip. I appreciate any insight or comment you may give me or point me to sites where I can get more information. Thanks in advance!
Andy
-------------- next part...
2006 Apr 17
2
How to create a compact Speex library
...ts/pointers as to what I should remove
given my operating Speex parameters (5.95 kilo bits
/sec). Jim, you are correct, the .a has nothing to do
with the final resources being used; the .a has other
headers/data that don't show up when I linked with my
application. By the way, I'm using a TMS320VC5510
DSP. Thanks to Jean-Marc for his help: I was able to
remove vbr.c, all exc_*.c except exc_10_16_table.c,
and gain_table.c (for references to those tables, I
just replaced them with "0", is that OK?).
Regards,
Andy
2007 Jan 04
0
Speex support for TI DaVinci processor
...peex format, and give it
>> to the application on the ARM side via the shared memory; on the
>> inbound flow (from ARM), the DSP gets encoded Speex data via the
>> shared memory, decodes it and then plays it to the speaker.
>>
>> I know there's a Speex port for the TMS320VC5510 but will that port
>> work for the C64xx series? Thanks.
>>
>> Regards Andy
>>
>> ----- Original Message ---- From: Jerry Trantow <jtrantow@ieee.org>
>> To: ndno72-speex@yahoo.com; speex-dev@xiph.org Sent: Tuesday,
>> December 5, 2006 1:55:13 PM Subj...
2004 Aug 06
2
Introduction...
...TI range of
DSPs. Initially we are going to target a TI Floating point device. the
device we have chosen is the TMS320C6711
See
http://focus.ti.com/docs/prod/productfolder.jhtml?genericPartNumber=TMS320C6711
B) We will then plan to do some porting work to the TI fixed-point
range. Most likely TMS320VC5510 - basically because our project is
battery powered the TI TMS320C55xx series is excellent as regards power
consumption.
See
http://focus.ti.com/docs/prod/productfolder.jhtml?genericPartNumber=TMS320VC5510
C) TI within the UK are aware of what we are doing and are supporting us
in various ways...
2004 Aug 06
0
Introduction...
...going to target a TI Floating point device. the
> device we have chosen is the TMS320C6711
>
> See
>
> http://focus.ti.com/docs/prod/productfolder.jhtml?genericPartNumbe
r=TMS320C6711
>
> B) We will then plan to do some porting work to the TI fixed-point
> range. Most likely TMS320VC5510 - basically because our project is
> battery powered the TI TMS320C55xx series is excellent as regards power
> consumption.
>
> See
>
> http://focus.ti.com/docs/prod/productfolder.jhtml?genericPartNumbe
r=TMS320VC5510
>
> C) TI within the UK are aware of what we are doing an...
2006 Dec 05
0
Speex support for TI DaVinci processor
...bject: [Speex-dev] Speex support for TI DaVinci processor
Hi,
My company just recently bought a TI DaVinci development board and I'm
trying to port Speex to run on it. The TI DaVinci chip has an ARM926
processor and a TMS320C64+ DSP in it. I was able to get Speex somewhat
working on a TMS320VC5510 about a year ago but I was wondering is there
anything special I need to do to get Speex working on the TMS320C64+ DSP in
the DaVinci chip. I appreciate any insight or comment you may give me or
point me to sites where I can get more information. Thanks in advance!
Andy
-------------- nex...
2008 Dec 04
1
celt for TMS320 C55x
Hi all,
I'm trying to build the celt package on the Texas TMS320VC5510 DSK.
I think there are some #define for it in the code, but I'm doing something
wrong.
Is there any documentation about it?
So far I'm building with the TI_C5X_ASM;CONFIG_TI_C55X #define.
Any help?
Thank you.
Giovanni
2006 Apr 13
4
How to create a compact Speex library
--- Jean-Marc Valin <jean-marc.valin@usherbrooke.ca>
wrote:
> > Sorry if this a repost but I want to create the
> > smallest Speex library possible to be put in TI's
> > TMS320 DSP. I'm only interested in one
> configuration:
> > 5.97 Kbps narrowband. What part of source code
> can I
> > remove? Currently, when I compiled the version
>