search for: tmpu_bcho

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "tmpu_bcho".

2011 Jul 26
0
[LLVMdev] dragon egg adding extra characters to function names
Hi Gregory, > I'm looking at compiling some pieces of the standard library with llvm but I'm > running into problems with some functions being renamed by dragonegg. For > example, when I compile the acos implementation with plain gcc I get: > > $ nm acos.o > 0000000000000000 r .LC1 > 0000000000000048 r .LC10 > 0000000000000050 r .LC11 > 0000000000000058 r .LC12
2011 Jul 25
2
[LLVMdev] dragon egg adding extra characters to function names
Hello, I'm looking at compiling some pieces of the standard library with llvm but I'm running into problems with some functions being renamed by dragonegg. For example, when I compile the acos implementation with plain gcc I get: $ nm acos.o 0000000000000000 r .LC1 0000000000000048 r .LC10 0000000000000050 r .LC11 0000000000000058 r .LC12 0000000000000060 r .LC13 0000000000000068 r .LC14
2011 Jul 27
2
[LLVMdev] dragon egg adding extra characters to function names
...hen I try to compile uClibc with llvm. I've attached the .o and the .bc for comparison. The text file is the result after preprocessing (to avoid having to download a bunch of stuff). Here is the compile line that I'm running for the llvm compilation: llvm-gcc -emit-llvm -S -c pp.c -o /tmp/tmpU_bCHo.ll -c llvm-as /tmp/tmpU_bCHo.ll -o=pp.bc.o (note that llvm-gcc is gcc-4.5 setup to generate assembly when it gets -emit-llvm). The non-llvm compilation is from: gcc-4.5 -c pp.c -o pp.o I thought this was something coded into llvm, but maybe it is just my scripts messing things up somehow... On T...