Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "tmpto".
2008 May 26
2
[LLVMdev] use after free [was: A quick update on FreeBSD support]
...plifier.cpp (working copy)
@@ -1609,8 +1609,10 @@
if (Remove.count(NI->To))
continue;
- IG.node(NI->To)->update(n1, reversePredicate(NI->LV),
Top);
- IG.node(n1)->update(NI->To, NI->LV, Top);
+ unsigned tmpTo = NI->To;
+ LatticeVal tmpLV = NI->LV;
+ IG.node(tmpTo)->update(n1, reversePredicate(tmpLV), Top);
+ IG.node(n1)->update(tmpTo, tmpLV, Top);
}
}
}
Of course, it doesn't address the bigger problem of having...
2008 May 26
0
[LLVMdev] use after free [was: A quick update on FreeBSD support]
...,8 +1609,10 @@
> if (Remove.count(NI->To))
> continue;
>
> - IG.node(NI->To)->update(n1, reversePredicate(NI->LV),
> Top);
> - IG.node(n1)->update(NI->To, NI->LV, Top);
> + unsigned tmpTo = NI->To;
> + LatticeVal tmpLV = NI->LV;
> + IG.node(tmpTo)->update(n1, reversePredicate(tmpLV), Top);
> + IG.node(n1)->update(tmpTo, tmpLV, Top);
> }
> }
> }
>
>
> Of course, it does...
2008 May 26
0
[LLVMdev] A quick update on FreeBSD support
On May 25, 2008, at 1:39 PM, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> On May 25, 2008, at 12:58 AM, Bill Wendling wrote:
>
>> Could you try this (massively hacky) patch out to see if it fixes
>> your
>> problem?
>>
>>
> Alas, it didn't fix the problem:
>
Crumbs.
I think that the analysis I told you before wasn't fully correct. I
think I mentioned something
2008 May 25
3
[LLVMdev] A quick update on FreeBSD support
On May 25, 2008, at 12:58 AM, Bill Wendling wrote:
> On May 24, 2008, at 4:25 PM, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
>
>> On May 24, 2008, at 12:12 PM, Bill Wendling wrote:
>>
>>> Let us know if you would like extra eyes on the two PPC failures.
>>> Many
>>> of us have a lot of experience with C++. :-) Do you know where these
>>> allocations are?