Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "tmp62".
Did you mean:
tmp2
2011 Apr 05
2
[LLVMdev] Incompatible types at call site
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote:
> Hi Arushi,
>
>
> %tmp63 = call %struct.TypHeader* (...)* bitcast (%struct.TypHeader*
>> (%struct.TypHeader*, i64, i64)* @Cyclotomic to %struct.TypHeader*
>> (...)*)(%struct.TypHeader* %tmp62, i64 %tmp24, i32 1) nounwind, !dbg !907
>> ;
>> <%struct.TypHeader*> [#uses=1]
>>
>> the 3rd parameter is now used in an srem statement. How do we know what
>> value is
>> used? Does this use decide whether the value is sign extended or zero
>> extend...
2011 Apr 06
0
[LLVMdev] Incompatible types at call site
Unoptimized IR
%tmp63 = call %struct.TypHeader* (...)* bitcast (%struct.TypHeader*
(%struct.TypHeader*, i64, i64)* @Cyclotomic to %struct.TypHeader*
(...)*)(%struct.TypHeader* %tmp62, i64 %tmp24, i32 1) nounwind, !dbg !907 ;
<%struct.TypHeader*> [#uses=1]
Optimized IR
%tmp63 = call%struct.TypHeader*
(%struct.TypHeader*, i64, i64)* @Cyclotomic (%struct.TypHeader* %tmp62, i64
%tmp24, i64 1) nounwind
<%struct.TypHeader*> [#uses=1]
The way InstCombine manages this,...
2011 Apr 05
2
[LLVMdev] Incompatible types at call site
%tmp63 = call %struct.TypHeader* (...)* bitcast (%struct.TypHeader*
(%struct.TypHeader*, i64, i64)* @Cyclotomic to %struct.TypHeader*
(...)*)(%struct.TypHeader* %tmp62, i64 %tmp24, i32 1) nounwind, !dbg !907 ;
<%struct.TypHeader*> [#uses=1]
the 3rd parameter is now used in an srem statement. How do we know what
value is used? Does this use decide whether the value is sign extended or
zero extended?
Arushi
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 1:35 AM, Duncan Sands <...
2011 Apr 05
0
[LLVMdev] Incompatible types at call site
Hi Arushi,
> %tmp63 = call %struct.TypHeader* (...)* bitcast (%struct.TypHeader*
> (%struct.TypHeader*, i64, i64)* @Cyclotomic to %struct.TypHeader*
> (...)*)(%struct.TypHeader* %tmp62, i64 %tmp24, i32 1) nounwind, !dbg !907 ;
> <%struct.TypHeader*> [#uses=1]
>
> the 3rd parameter is now used in an srem statement. How do we know what value is
> used? Does this use decide whether the value is sign extended or zero extended?
inside the called function the 3rd val...
2011 Apr 05
0
[LLVMdev] Incompatible types at call site
Hi Arushi,
> For a call like this,
>
> %tmp6 = call i32 (...)* bitcast (i32 (i8*, i8, i8**)* @ssplit to i32 (...)*)(i8*
> %tmp599, i32 46, i8** %domainv3) nounwind ; <i32>
>
> does the 2nd argument get zero extended or sign extended?
neither since it does not have the zext or sext attribute.
Ciao, Duncan.
2011 Apr 05
3
[LLVMdev] Incompatible types at call site
Hi,
For a call like this,
%tmp6 = call i32 (...)* bitcast (i32 (i8*, i8, i8**)* @ssplit to i32
(...)*)(i8* %tmp599, i32 46, i8** %domainv3) nounwind ; <i32>
does the 2nd argument get zero extended or sign extended?
Thanks,
Arushi
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
2008 Jan 12
1
[LLVMdev] Labels
...i32* @yypos
store i32 %yythunkpos11, i32 * @yythunkpos
%tmp60 = call i32 @yymatchChar(i8 102)
%tmp61 = icmp ne i32 %tmp102, 0
br i1 %tmp61, label %StringNotEqualZero15, label %StringEqualZero15
StringNotEqualZero15:
br label %l1
StringEqualZero15:
call i32 @yyText(i32 %yybegin, i32 %yyend)
%tmp62 = ptrtoint i8* @str2 to i32
%tmp63 = icmp eq i32 %tmp2, 0
br i1 %tmp63, label %PredicateEqualZero2, label %PredicateNotEqualZero2
PredicateEqualZero2:
br label %l1
PredicateNotEqualZero2:
%tmp64 = call i32 @yymatchChar(i8 106)
%tmp65 = icmp ne i32 %tmp106, 0
br i1 %tmp65, label %StringNotEqua...