Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "tmp599".
Did you mean:
tmp59
2011 Apr 05
3
[LLVMdev] Incompatible types at call site
Hi,
For a call like this,
%tmp6 = call i32 (...)* bitcast (i32 (i8*, i8, i8**)* @ssplit to i32
(...)*)(i8* %tmp599, i32 46, i8** %domainv3) nounwind ; <i32>
does the 2nd argument get zero extended or sign extended?
Thanks,
Arushi
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110404/aff5ff6d/attachment.html>
2011 Apr 05
2
[LLVMdev] Incompatible types at call site
...alue is sign extended or
zero extended?
Arushi
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 1:35 AM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote:
> Hi Arushi,
>
> > For a call like this,
> >
> > %tmp6 = call i32 (...)* bitcast (i32 (i8*, i8, i8**)* @ssplit to i32
> (...)*)(i8*
> > %tmp599, i32 46, i8** %domainv3) nounwind ; <i32>
> >
> > does the 2nd argument get zero extended or sign extended?
>
> neither since it does not have the zext or sext attribute.
>
> Ciao, Duncan.
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailin...
2011 Apr 05
0
[LLVMdev] Incompatible types at call site
Hi Arushi,
> For a call like this,
>
> %tmp6 = call i32 (...)* bitcast (i32 (i8*, i8, i8**)* @ssplit to i32 (...)*)(i8*
> %tmp599, i32 46, i8** %domainv3) nounwind ; <i32>
>
> does the 2nd argument get zero extended or sign extended?
neither since it does not have the zext or sext attribute.
Ciao, Duncan.
2011 Apr 05
0
[LLVMdev] Incompatible types at call site
...1:35 AM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr
> <mailto:baldrick at free.fr>> wrote:
>
> Hi Arushi,
>
> > For a call like this,
> >
> > %tmp6 = call i32 (...)* bitcast (i32 (i8*, i8, i8**)* @ssplit to i32
> (...)*)(i8*
> > %tmp599, i32 46, i8** %domainv3) nounwind ; <i32>
> >
> > does the 2nd argument get zero extended or sign extended?
>
> neither since it does not have the zext or sext attribute.
>
> Ciao, Duncan.
> _______________________________________________
>...
2011 Apr 05
2
[LLVMdev] Incompatible types at call site
...rick at free.fr
>> <mailto:baldrick at free.fr>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Arushi,
>>
>> > For a call like this,
>> >
>> > %tmp6 = call i32 (...)* bitcast (i32 (i8*, i8, i8**)* @ssplit to i32
>> (...)*)(i8*
>> > %tmp599, i32 46, i8** %domainv3) nounwind ; <i32>
>> >
>> > does the 2nd argument get zero extended or sign extended?
>>
>> neither since it does not have the zext or sext attribute.
>>
>> Ciao, Duncan.
>> ______________________________...
2011 Apr 06
0
[LLVMdev] Incompatible types at call site
...at free.fr>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Arushi,
>>>
>>> > For a call like this,
>>> >
>>> > %tmp6 = call i32 (...)* bitcast (i32 (i8*, i8, i8**)* @ssplit to
>>> i32
>>> (...)*)(i8*
>>> > %tmp599, i32 46, i8** %domainv3) nounwind ; <i32>
>>> >
>>> > does the 2nd argument get zero extended or sign extended?
>>>
>>> neither since it does not have the zext or sext attribute.
>>>
>>> Ciao, Duncan.
>>> __...