Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "tls_prioriti".
Did you mean:
tls_priority
2018 Jun 25
0
[PATCH nbdkit] tls: Implement Pre-Shared Keys (PSK) authentication.
---
docs/nbdkit.pod.in | 45 +++++++++--
src/crypto.c | 234 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
src/internal.h | 1 +
src/main.c | 8 +-
4 files changed, 210 insertions(+), 78 deletions(-)
diff --git a/docs/nbdkit.pod.in b/docs/nbdkit.pod.in
index 42e6e6b..80d1ecd 100644
--- a/docs/nbdkit.pod.in
+++ b/docs/nbdkit.pod.in
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ nbdkit - A
2020 Aug 17
2
couple of questions
Hey folks,
I've been experimenting with native NBD live migration w/ TLS and have
a couple of questions.
1) It appears that in some cases modified default_tls_x509_cert_dir
from qemu.conf is not respected, seems like virsh always expects a
default location and does not check default_tls_x509_cert_dir:
virsh # migrate vm1 qemu+tls://ratchet.lan/system --live --persistent
--undefinesource
2018 Jun 25
2
[PATCH nbdkit] tls: Implement Pre-Shared Keys (PSK) authentication.
This is ready for review but needs a bit more real-world testing
before I'd be happy about it going upstream. It also needs tests.
It does interoperate with qemu, at least in my limited tests.
Rich.
2018 Jun 25
1
[PATCH v2 nbdkit] tls: Implement Pre-Shared Keys (PSK)
v2:
* Improved documentation.
* Added a test (interop with qemu client).
2020 Aug 17
0
Re: couple of questions
On Sun, Aug 16, 2020 at 22:43:30 -0700, Vjaceslavs Klimovs wrote:
> Hey folks,
> I've been experimenting with native NBD live migration w/ TLS and have
> a couple of questions.
>
> 1) It appears that in some cases modified default_tls_x509_cert_dir
> from qemu.conf is not respected, seems like virsh always expects a
> default location and does not check
2017 Feb 26
2
samba-tool domain classicupgrade smb_krb5_context_init_basic failed (Invalid argument)
On 27/02/17 08:05, Tom Robinson via samba wrote:
> On 17/02/17 07:58, Andrew Bartlett via samba wrote:
>> On Fri, 2017-02-17 at 07:48 +1100, Tom Robinson via samba wrote:
>>> Anyone?
>> Can you please post a gdb backtrace --full?
>>
>>
> Hi,
>
> I replied last week with a full backtrace but I didn't see my post come through. The email was only
>
2017 Feb 16
2
samba-tool domain classicupgrade smb_krb5_context_init_basic failed (Invalid argument)
On Fri, 2017-02-17 at 07:48 +1100, Tom Robinson via samba wrote:
> Anyone?
Can you please post a gdb backtrace --full?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 862 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL:
2019 May 23
2
[PATCH libnbd] api: Get rid of nbd_connection.
This isn't quite finished because not all of the tests or examples
have been updated, but it demonstrates an idea: Should we forget about
the concept of having multiple connections managed under a single
handle?
In this patch there is a single ‘struct nbd_handle *’ which manages a
single state machine and connection (and therefore no nbd_connection).
To connect to a multi-conn server you must