search for: tls_prioriti

Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "tls_prioriti".

Did you mean: tls_priority
2018 Jun 25
0
[PATCH nbdkit] tls: Implement Pre-Shared Keys (PSK) authentication.
--- docs/nbdkit.pod.in | 45 +++++++++-- src/crypto.c | 234 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------- src/internal.h | 1 + src/main.c | 8 +- 4 files changed, 210 insertions(+), 78 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/nbdkit.pod.in b/docs/nbdkit.pod.in index 42e6e6b..80d1ecd 100644 --- a/docs/nbdkit.pod.in +++ b/docs/nbdkit.pod.in @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ nbdkit - A
2020 Aug 17
2
couple of questions
Hey folks, I've been experimenting with native NBD live migration w/ TLS and have a couple of questions. 1) It appears that in some cases modified default_tls_x509_cert_dir from qemu.conf is not respected, seems like virsh always expects a default location and does not check default_tls_x509_cert_dir: virsh # migrate vm1 qemu+tls://ratchet.lan/system --live --persistent --undefinesource
2018 Jun 25
2
[PATCH nbdkit] tls: Implement Pre-Shared Keys (PSK) authentication.
This is ready for review but needs a bit more real-world testing before I'd be happy about it going upstream. It also needs tests. It does interoperate with qemu, at least in my limited tests. Rich.
2018 Jun 25
1
[PATCH v2 nbdkit] tls: Implement Pre-Shared Keys (PSK)
v2: * Improved documentation. * Added a test (interop with qemu client).
2020 Aug 17
0
Re: couple of questions
On Sun, Aug 16, 2020 at 22:43:30 -0700, Vjaceslavs Klimovs wrote: > Hey folks, > I've been experimenting with native NBD live migration w/ TLS and have > a couple of questions. > > 1) It appears that in some cases modified default_tls_x509_cert_dir > from qemu.conf is not respected, seems like virsh always expects a > default location and does not check
2017 Feb 26
2
samba-tool domain classicupgrade smb_krb5_context_init_basic failed (Invalid argument)
On 27/02/17 08:05, Tom Robinson via samba wrote: > On 17/02/17 07:58, Andrew Bartlett via samba wrote: >> On Fri, 2017-02-17 at 07:48 +1100, Tom Robinson via samba wrote: >>> Anyone? >> Can you please post a gdb backtrace --full? >> >> > Hi, > > I replied last week with a full backtrace but I didn't see my post come through. The email was only >
2017 Feb 16
2
samba-tool domain classicupgrade smb_krb5_context_init_basic failed (Invalid argument)
On Fri, 2017-02-17 at 07:48 +1100, Tom Robinson via samba wrote: > Anyone? Can you please post a gdb backtrace --full? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 862 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL:
2019 May 23
2
[PATCH libnbd] api: Get rid of nbd_connection.
This isn't quite finished because not all of the tests or examples have been updated, but it demonstrates an idea: Should we forget about the concept of having multiple connections managed under a single handle? In this patch there is a single ‘struct nbd_handle *’ which manages a single state machine and connection (and therefore no nbd_connection). To connect to a multi-conn server you must