Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "tls_models2".
Did you mean:
tls_models
2012 Jun 20
0
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [Patch, RFC] Re: Adding support for explicitly specified TLS models (PR9788)
...iour we discussed.
The "globaldynamic" and default values have been merged, and LLVM will
start off with the user-specified model, but choose a more specific
one if possible.
Please review.
Thanks,
Hans
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: tls_models2.diff
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 40607 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120620/ac5d72af/attachment.obj>
2012 Jun 15
2
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [Patch, RFC] Re: Adding support for explicitly specified TLS models (PR9788)
(To the list this time..)
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 7:38 PM, Rafael EspĂndola
<rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote:
>> The point still stands, though: that code requires the tls_model
>> attribute to be respected; if the compiler chooses local-exec instead,
>> it won't be dlopen-able.
>
> This is a fairly contrived use case, and an extension of a gcc extension.