search for: tls1.1

Sure did! I am even playing with different options (including NONE) and it seems to ignore the contents of ssl.conf I have tried Environment=G_TLS_GNUTLS_PRIORITY=NORMAL:+TLS1.2:!TLS1.1:!TLS1.0:!ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA: Environment=G_TLS_GNUTLS_PRIORITY=NORMAL:+TLS1.2:!TLS1.1:!TLS1.0:!ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA Environment=G_TLS_GNUTLS_PRIORITY=PFS

On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 16:50, Eero Volotinen wrote: > > Stop paranoia? Tlsv1.0 is not recommended when storing credit card data. > > Eero > Hi List, > > Does anyone know why the above URL is still using TLS V1.0. > > I can't connect to it unless I enable TLS V1.0 which I was under the > impression that it should not be used > anymore. > > Thanks for any

Thanks, Randal for the response. But it did not work. Here the results: #yum info cockpit Name : cockpit Arch : x86_64 Version : 195.1 Release : 1.el7.centos.0.1 Size : 51 k Repo : installed >From repo : extras Summary : Web Console for Linux servers URL : https://cockpit-project.org/ License : LGPLv2+ [root at cockpit ~]# cat

The openssl library in Debian unstable (targeting Buster) supports TLS1.2 by default. The library itself supports also TLS1.1 and TLS1.0. If the admin decides to also support TLS1.[01] users he can then enable the lower protocol version in case the users can't update their system. Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian at breakpoint.cc> --- src/config/all-settings.c

On 25.03.2016 17:29, Eero Volotinen wrote: >> @Eero: IMHO you are missing some points here. There are more and more >> browsers that are unable to use SSL{2,3} as well as TLS1.0, not just >> disabled via config, but this decission was made at compile time. >> Newer Android and Apple-iOS devices for example. >> >> > This is not true. it works fine with latest

On 27 August 2017 08:32:06 CEST, Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> wrote: >> DEF(SET_STR, ssl_protocols), >> DEF(SET_STR, ssl_cert_username_field), >> DEF(SET_STR, ssl_crypto_device), >> + DEF(SET_STR, ssl_lowest_version), > >Does it really require a new setting? Couldn't it use the existing >ssl_protocols setting? You need to set a minimal version.

Hi, I'm using cockpit in standard port 9090 in a Centos 7 system. Due to a suggestion from management, they want TLS 1.1 disabled system-wide in all Linux boxes and TLS 1.2 enabled. I have not found proper documentation on how to disable it for cockpit (version 195.1 ships with Centos 7) So far I have tried (https://cockpit-project.org/guide/149/https.html):

I'm running Dovecot 2.2.5 and want to make it refuse SSLv2, SSLv3 and TLSv1.0. Clients will opportunistically use TLS 1.1 and 1.2, but now I want require they do so. Is it enough to set ssl_cipher_list = HIGH:!SSLv2:!SSLv3:!TLSv1.0:!aNULL:!MD5 or are there additional settings I need to specify?

> @Eero: IMHO you are missing some points here. There are more and more > browsers that are unable to use SSL{2,3} as well as TLS1.0, not just > disabled via config, but this decission was made at compile time. > Newer Android and Apple-iOS devices for example. > > This is not true. it works fine with latest android and ios. I just tested it. > And the point is not that the

Oops, excuse my typo Create /etc/systemd/system/cockpit.service.d/ssl.conf containing [Service] Environment=G_TLS_GNUTLS_PRIORITY=NORMAL:-VERS-SSL3.0:-VERS-TLS1.0:-VERS-TLS1.1 Then systemctl daemon-reload systemctl restart cockpit To verify that TLS 1.1 is disabled, echo test | openssl s_client -connect localhost:9090 -tls1_1 2>&1 | grep -e Protocol -e Cipher The expected result is:

Hi List, Does anyone know why the above URL is still using TLS V1.0. I can't connect to it unless I enable TLS V1.0 which I was under the impression that it should not be used anymore. Thanks for any enlightenment. Steve --

Hi samba list, I work on an classicupgrade of our NT4/ldap domain. On my tests (DC and filer are on FreeBSD and zfs file system, client is a Windows 10 22H2): -> I'm able to do this classicupgrade and keep all users able to connect on computers with their domain account. -> In a second step I configure samba DC to improve security and by the way I upgrade our FL to 2012_R2, schema

On 01.10.2019 14:06, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 01/10/2019 12:51, Arkadiusz Karpi?ski wrote: >> >> On 30.09.2019 20:03, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>> On 30/09/2019 18:06, akarpinski wrote: >>>> Samba version is 4.10.7 >>>> >>>> smb.conf: >>>> >>>> # Global parameters >>>> [global]

On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 02:56:26PM +0000, Olivier BONHOMME wrote: > Hello Tom, > > It's indeed an interesting way. I didn't think about something just disabled. I > browsed, gnutls rpm changelog and I saw this : > > * Thu May 3 2012 Tomas Mraz <tmraz at redhat.com> 2.8.5-7 > - more TLS-1.2 compatibility fixes (TLS-1.2 stays disabled by default) > > So

On Dec 27, 2019, at 16:28, Erick Perez - Quadrian Enterprises <eperez at quadrianweb.com> wrote: > > [root at cockpit ~]# cat /etc/systemd/system/cockpit.service.d/ssl.conf > Environment=G_TLS_GNUTLS_PRIORITY=NORMAL:-VERS-SSL3.0:-VERS-TLS1.0:-VERS-TLS1.1 > > [root at cockpit ~]# > [root at cockpit ~]# systemctl start cockpit > [root at cockpit ~]# systemctl status

On 26 Aug 2017, at 19.47, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian at breakpoint.cc> wrote: > > The openssl library in Debian unstable (targeting Buster) supports > TLS1.2 by default. The library itself supports also TLS1.1 and TLS1.0. > If the admin decides to also support TLS1.[01] users he can then enable > the lower protocol version in case the users can't update their

On 2017-08-27 13:46, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 27 August 2017 08:32:06 CEST, Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> wrote: >>> DEF(SET_STR, ssl_protocols), >>> DEF(SET_STR, ssl_cert_username_field), >>> DEF(SET_STR, ssl_crypto_device), >>> + DEF(SET_STR, ssl_lowest_version), >> Does it really require a new setting? Couldn't it use the

On 5/31/20 11:54 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote: > >> On 31/05/2020 07:36 Mark Constable <markc at renta.net >> <mailto:markc at renta.net>> wrote: >> >> >> I currently use Ubuntu 20.04 with Dovecot 2.3.7.2 and OpenSSL 1.1.1f. >> >> A few months ago there was an update to all these systems and since >> then I've had to talk W7 and old Mac

Good evening, We have been dealing with an incident for several weeks during peak load times, either due to authentications or service accesses that rely on Samba 4 AD. Below are the details of the current Samba version and OS: **Samba version 4.19.2** ```bash ~$ uname -r 5.15.0-41-generic ~$ sudo lsb_release No LSB modules are available. ~$ sudo lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available.

You looking for something like this i think? Enable TLS1.2 ( and if supported TLS1.3) and allowes AES128 and EAS256. tls priority = SECURE256:+SECURE128:-VERS-SSL3.0:-VERS-TLS1.0:-VERS-TLS1.1:-VERS-DTLS1.0:-VERS-DTLS1.1 Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Robert Marcano via samba > Verzonden: dinsdag