Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "tlook".
Did you mean:
look
2008 Jan 08
0
PwrGSD
...t Regards,
Grant Izmirlian
Mathematical Statistician
Division of Cancer Prevention
US National Cancer Institute
1-(301)496-7519
izmirlig at mail.nih.gov
????? ?????????
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tlook <- c(7.14, 8.14, 9.14, 10.14, 10.64, 11.15, 12.14, 13.14,
14.14, 15.14, 16.14, 17.14, 18.14, 19.14, 20.14)
t0 <- 0:19
h0 <- c(rep(3.73e-04, 2), rep(7.45e-04, 3), rep(1.49e-03, 15))
rhaz <-c(1, 0.9125, 0.8688, 0.7814, 0.6941, 0.6943, 0.607...
2008 Jan 08
0
PwrGSD
...t Regards,
Grant Izmirlian
Mathematical Statistician
Division of Cancer Prevention
US National Cancer Institute
1-(301)496-7519
izmirlig at mail.nih.gov
????? ?????????
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tlook <- c(7.14, 8.14, 9.14, 10.14, 10.64, 11.15, 12.14, 13.14,
14.14, 15.14, 16.14, 17.14, 18.14, 19.14, 20.14)
t0 <- 0:19
h0 <- c(rep(3.73e-04, 2), rep(7.45e-04, 3), rep(1.49e-03, 15))
rhaz <-c(1, 0.9125, 0.8688, 0.7814, 0.6941, 0.6943, 0.607...
2011 Dec 20
0
sedf: remove useless tracing printk and harmonize comments style.
...elements of the waitqueue, whether their
+ /* Check for the first elements of the waitqueue, whether their
* next period has already started.
*/
list_for_each_safe ( cur, tmp, waitq )
{
curinf = list_entry(cur, struct sedf_vcpu_info, list);
- PRINT(4,"\tLooking @ dom %i.%i\n",
- curinf->vcpu->domain->domain_id, curinf->vcpu->vcpu_id);
if ( PERIOD_BEGIN(curinf) > now )
break;
__del_from_queue(curinf->vcpu);
__add_to_runqueue_sort(curinf->vcpu);
}
- PRINT(3,"...
2017 Sep 01
2
ERROR during high volume MoH dialplan
...on behalf of Tony Mountifield <tony at softins.co.uk>
Sent: Friday, September 1, 2017 11:01 AM
To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] ERROR during high volume MoH dialplan
In article <CY4PR2201MB14643C2177C953FA27AC9E2BA8920 at CY4PR2201MB1464.namprd22.prod.outlook.com>,
Joseph Smith <warlock1999 at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks for the feedback.
>
> I do agree with having multiple smaller servers. When I was first approached with this task I mentioned as much.
> However, the current desire is to work with already existing hardware....