search for: tldr

Alexander Chemeris a ?crit : > Ok, if I comment out inclusion of "filters_arm4.h" (or comment out its > only overridden function - normalize16()) it works fine. > > Also it works fine if I use -O0 for compilation. Specifying -O1 or -O2 lead > to segfault (if "filters_arm4.h" is included, sure). OK, so either I screwed up the alignment/constraints in the

[adding various lists and the two other nouveau maintainers to the list of recipients] For the rest of this mail: [TLDR: I'm adding this report to the list of tracked Linux kernel regressions; the text you find below is based on a few templates paragraphs you might have encountered already in similar form. See link in footer if these mails annoy you.] On 18.01.23 21:59, Chris Clayton wrote: > Hi. > >...

...y to how the spec behaved, but in this case I think it's a pretty safe bet to say that most implementations should generally DTRT here. I'm guessing that nbd-tester-client doesn't because of uninitialized code or something (haven't actually looked at it, must go, will do so later). TLDR: nbdkit is correct, nbd-tester-client is not, patches welcome. -- < ron> I mean, the main *practical* problem with C++, is there's like a dozen people in the world who think they really understand all of its rules, and pretty much all of them are just lying to themselves t...

...Authority\SYSTEM will full rights.. > > When set to windows, an ACL is synthesized the same way > Windows does it, only inclusing permissions for the owner > and NT Authority\SYSTEM > > The default for this option is posix. > > tldr: this reverts behaviour to what it was before #12028 and make the > behaviour introduced by #12028 optional. > > Plan? Michael? Uri? Jeremy? I like this. Puts the tweak in the right place IMHO. Jeremy.

Some more information about the relaxation pass whose effectiveness and convergence guarantees were listed as a concern: TLDR; Our relaxation pass is similar to what LLVM’s MCAssembler does but with a caveat for efficiency. Our experimental results show it is efficient and convergence is guaranteed. Our relaxation pass is very similar to what MCAssembler does as it needs to solve the same problem, which is laying out ba...

...here was a thread this weekend in the fedora users' mailing list where a user had problems updating R 4.0.2: "non-rpm R libraries not accessible now w R v 4.0.x" https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users at lists.fedoraproject.org/ thread/2FFST3GWZCNM45SX53VKB255TO4LOV4C/ TLDR; as far as I can see the user had installed (as root) a package from cran and had installed the same package (R-here) from the Fedora repositories. Since the package were installed in different locations the package installed by the user appeared first and thus it won regarding the Fedora packag...

Hi, Does this kind of IR have "undefined behavior" under LLVM semantics or is it acceptable? (TLDR: a store of i64 at offset n, followed by a load of i32 at offset n+1.) define void @foo(i32* %A, i64 %n) { entry: %arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds i32, i32* %A, i64 %n %arrayidx_cast = bitcast i32* %arrayidx to i64* store i64 0, i64* %arrayidx_cast, align 4 %add1 = add i64 %n, 1 %array...

TLDR: Heads up for out of tree backends - you're going to need to update your *DAGToDAGISel::Select method to unconditionally replace nodes directly instead of returning the desired replacement. So I'm working on fixing the undefined behaviour I described in llvm.org/PR26808. As part of this, w...

...m, clang, openmp) so we hopefully get all interested parties involved.] This is an RFC for the design of the OpenMP front-ends under the LLVM umbrella. It is necessary to talk about this now as Flang (aka. F18) is maturing at a very promising rate and about to become a sub-project next to Clang. TLDR; Keep AST nodes and Sema separated but unify LLVM-IR generation for OpenMP constructs based on the (almost) identical OpenMP directive level. For more information and to participate in the discussion, please see the flang-dev post [0]. Thanks, Johannes [0] http://lists.flang-compiler.org/pip...

...peex/filters_arm4.h b/libspeex/filters_arm4.h index 7a74042..2c64625 100644 --- a/libspeex/filters_arm4.h +++ b/libspeex/filters_arm4.h @@ -46,9 +46,9 @@ int normalize16(const spx_sig_t *x, spx_word16_t *y, spx_sig_t max_scale, int le ".normalize16loop1%=: \n" "\tldr %4, [%0], #4 \n" - "\tcmps %4, %1 \n" + "\tcmp %4, %1 \n" "\tmovgt %1, %4 \n" - "\tcmps %4, %3 \n" + "\tcmp %4, %3 \n" "\tmovlt %3, %4 \n" "\tsubs %2, %2, #1 \n&quot...

...abase put'. BUT, the problem comes in when I want to sync CF entries to/from both Asterisk systems. I seem to be having race conditions where an entry is removed on system A, but before that removal can sync to system B, we've already imported that to system A again. Does this make sense? TLDR; How do I sync AstDB entries between two hosts, in both directions, while maintaining data integrity? Thanks --Tim

...;> Actually, >> >>> ppois(19,lambda=0.9)<ppois(18,lambda=0.9) >> [1] TRUE >> >> Which could not be TRUE. > This is just another manifestation of > > 0.1 * 3 > 0.3 > #> [1] TRUE > > This discussion returns to this list from time to time. TLDR; this is > not an R issue, but an unavoidable floating point issue. Well, here the request may be interpreted not as "do it without round error" which is indeed unavoidable but rather "please cope with rounding errors in a way that return consistent result for ppois()". You...

...calc_pi -S , it does compile with the expected outputs and the basic block labels properly generated in my section. I get a file with proper labels e.g. __custom_section: .long 19 .quad .LBB0_0 .long 1 .quad .LBB0_1 .long 28 .quad .LBB0_2 .long 3 ... etc. TLDR: compiles correctly, will not link successfully to make a binary because the symbol of the basic block in the .text section doesn't exist. How do I ensure the Basic Block Symbol does not get destroyed until my section is read in as well during linking? Followup Question: How do I ensure that a...

...is executed. On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 7:24 PM Sriraman Tallam <tmsriram at google.com> wrote: > > Maks and team, thanks for the detailed feedback and we will address all of your > concerns. Let’s begin with CFI and DebugInfo first since this is already > being discussed. > > TLDR; clang is pathological and the actual CFI bloat will go down from 7x to > 2x. > > Let us present the CFI Bloats for each benchmark with the default option, which > is creating basic block sections only for functions with samples. For clang, > it is 7x and *not 17x* (the 17 x number...

...uildMI(MBB, MBB.begin(), DL, TII->get(X86::SUB32ri),X86::GS) .addReg(X86::GS) .addImm(0x8); machine function pass dump: %gs = SUB32ri %gs, 8, implicit-def %eflags Objdump -d assembly from executable 400510: 81 ed 04 00 00 00 sub $0x8,%ebp TLDR: I am trying to create custom assembly via BuildMI() and manipulate segment registers via a MachineFunctionPass. I have looked at LLVMs safestack implementation, but they are taking a fairly complicated hybrid approach between an IR Function pass with Backend support. I would like to stay as a sin...

...you. No, sorry. This has been discussed extensively before, leading to the most uncivil discussion our bugtracker has ever seen and the only permanent user bans I've ever had to implement. Myself and the other developers have zero desire to relitigate this and no intention of implementing it. TLDR in case you can't find the past discssion: ssh is not a desktop program and predates the XDG specifications by two decades. Adding additional configuration paths is confusing and potentially risky for .ssh as, quite unlike usual "desktop" apps, it *grants system access* and having its...

function ppois is a function calculate the CDF of Poisson distribution, it should generate a non-decreasing result, but what I got is: > any(diff(ppois(0:19,lambda=0.9))<0) [1] TRUE Actually, > ppois(19,lambda=0.9)<ppois(18,lambda=0.9) [1] TRUE Which could not be TRUE. Code is tested in both R 3.5.1 and Microsoft R Open 3.5.1. _

...>> names are reserved only when they have linkage). But this doesn't >> work well for LLVM because we want to be able to LTO an internalized >> C library. So I think we need the rule for LLVM function names to not >> rely on linkage here. > > Oh sorry, (almost) TLDR I didn’t get to this part. I don’t see how > this is applicable. If you’re statically linking in a libc, I think > it is fine to forgo the optimizations that TargetLibraryInfo is all about. > > If these transformations are important to use in this case, we should > invent a new...

Update: All in tree backends now implement `void Select`. I'll be removing the SelectImpl path on Monday. Justin Bogner <mail at justinbogner.com> writes: > TLDR: Heads up for out of tree backends - you're going to need to update > your *DAGToDAGISel::Select method to unconditionally replace nodes > directly instead of returning the desired replacement. > > So I'm working on fixing the undefined behaviour I described in > llvm.org/PR2...

...quot;an 8-bit value that is multiplied by 4 and added to the value of the PC to form the memory address" (via ARMARM), so that the correct mnemonics is: ldr r6, [pc, #380] (provided by Apple's otool). I've traced the issue down to ARMInstrThumb.td: // A8.6.57 & A8.6.60 defm tLDR : thumb_ld_rr_ri_enc<0b100, 0b0110, t_addrmode_rrs4, t_addrmode_is4, AddrModeT1_4, IIC_iLoad_r, IIC_iLoad_i, "ldr", UnOpFrag<(load node:$Src)>>; In the generated TableGen output t...