search for: tkn

#copy and paste this into R f <- (structure(list(TKN = c(0.103011025, 0.018633208, 0.104235702, 0.074537363, 0.138286096), RM = c(215, 198, 148, 119, 61)), .Names = c("TKN", "RM"), class = "data.frame", row.names = 25:29)) plot(f$TKN~f$RM, type="b") I would like to reverse the X-Axis. How do I do this? -- L...

...ecking the need for power transformation. This function works fine using the version 0.50 of R, but gives an error message with version 0.60. The lm function in version 0.60 is different from that in version 0.50. Is there a bug in the new lm function? Kung-Sik Chan > BoxCox(lm(log.O2UP~BOD+TKN+TS+TVS+COD,data=alr222a)) Error in terms.default(formula, data = data) : unused argument to function > traceback() [1] "terms.default(formula, data = data)" [2] "lm(model, ...)" [3] "BoxCox(...

...tocols 1.5/2.0, OpenSSL 0x0090602f. I had to reinstall my Mandrake, and after that ssh gives me strange error messages. When I run command: ssh -f -L 1234:irixhost.somedomain.fi:110 irixhost.somedomain.fi sleep 5 on my Mandrake I get stty error mentioned on subject line. Also when I run: [tkn at localhost tkn]$ scp foobar.txt irixhost I get no error message, but when I run: [tkn at localhost tkn]$ scp foobar.txt irixhost: I get error again: stty: : Operation not supported on transport endpoint I am using rsa_key with password, and I use ssh-add to give password only once. What c...

This is what my data looks like DOC TOC TKN RM119mFeb-06 1 2 3 RM61mFeb-06 2 4 6 I have this both in a .csv and .txt I have read this in with read.csv("chemodr.csv", header=T) and this is what I get X dAmon DN.N Nitrite.N DOC OP P TKN TOC 1 RM215mFeb-06 0.000 0.1...

f <- (structure(list(X = structure(96:97, .Label = c("119DAmm", "119DN", "119DNN", "119DO", "119DOC", "119Flow", "119Nit", "119ON", "119OPhos", "119OrgP", "119Phos", "119TKN", "119TOC", "148DAmm", "148DN", "148DNN", "148DO", "148DOC", "148Flow", "148Nit", "148ON", "148OPhos", "148OrgP", "148Phos", "148TKN", "148TOC", "179...

...sage: >DALogFish<-lda(Cluster~DrainArea+Flow+StrmWidth+Gradient+NatComm+FishIBIUsed +QHEI+QHEIsub+QHEImwh_h+QHEIcov+QHEIchan+QHEIrip+QHEIpool+QHEIrif+QHEIgrads+ QHEIgradv+QHEImwh+QHEIcovtype+QHEIwwh+QHab+QHabBuff+QHabEros+QhabPool+ QHabWDRatio+QHabRif+QHabFines+QHabCov+QHabRating+QHabSize+TP+TKN+NH3+NH3Min +NO3NO2N+BOD+TSS+TSSMax+TDS+SSC+SSCMax+Chloride+Sulfate+Ecoli+ChlA+DOper+ DOperMin+DOperMin1_5+DOmgL+DOmgLMean+DOmgLMax+Cond+pH+pHMax+Trans+Temp+ TempMin+Temp4+Crop100+Crop500+CropSub+Dev100+Dev500+DevSub+For100+For500+ ForSub+Pas100+Pas500+PasSub+Wat100+Wat500+WatSub+Wet100+Wet500+WetSu...

...c(42L, 46L, 28L, 36L, 29L, 35L, 44L, 33L, NA, 43L, 29L, 42L, 35L, NA, 46L, 78L, 38L, 55L, 32L, 65L, 69L, 43L, 28L, 37L, 57L, 29L, 30L), TIC = c(1.5, 1.7, 3.3, 2.2, 2.2, 0.77, 0.79, 2.3, 1.9, 2, 2, 2.1, 2.2, 0.91, 0.99, 1.2, 1.6, 2.3, 1.5, 2.2, 1.6, 1.4, 1.9, 1.5, 2.1, 3.8, 3.9), TKN = c(0.61, 0.5, NA, 0.64, NA, 0.21, 0.25, 0.39, 0.28, 0.44, 0.24, 0.16, NA, 0.76, 0.32, 1.7, 0.26, NA, 0.3, 0.24, 0.27, 0.29, 0.17, NA, 0.15, 0.089, 0.18), TOC = c(4.3, 2.4, 2.7, 3.9, 2.3, 2.1, 2.1, 2.5, 2.2, 2.1, 2.3, 2.5, 2.1, 2.9, 2.7, 8.4, 2.5, 2.5, 2.9, 3, 2.8, 2.5, 2.4, 2.5...

Hi Felica, yes, this is the only reason to have larger frames is on bandwidth limited links having a gross (physical) bit rates of 10kbps per channel. Decades ago I calculated with figure (for AMR-NB but the same holds for Opus). https://www.tkn.tu-berlin.de/fileadmin/fg112/Hard_Software_Components/Software/hoene_07_2004_paper.pdf Von: Felicia Lim [mailto:flim at google.com] Gesendet: Freitag, 10. Juni 2016 16:59 An: Christian Hoene <christian.hoene at symonics.com> Betreff: Re: [opus] Patches for adding 120 ms encoding Yes,...

On 06/01/2016 02:06 PM, Felicia Lim wrote: > That was my intention with refactoring out the subframe encoding and > repacketizing bit. Or do you mean I should merge the explicit check for > 120 ms frame and the existing checks for 40/60 ms wideband? What I mean is that this line in opus_encoder.c: if (frame_size > st->Fs/50 && (st->mode == MODE_CELT_ONLY ||

...wtH9t6f/wA/C0XA0Kz9W/5d P+vmP/0IUf23p/8Az8LVW91G1u3tUgmVmFxGcf8AAhQ2BiwXl03zPd3BHYCQ1aW6l7zz/wDf1v8A Gs63GVUHpVRRcySskR3YUOcylMZZgB0Ofu16fs0tEc7epvfa5P8AnvP/AN/W/wAaQ3kn/Pef/v63 +NZdkZChLOXjOCpOc+/X/PX6DQjtWkjVxIgDNsAOevp0pOKW4tST7ZJ/z3n/AO/rf40fbJP+e8// AH9b/GqpRhIYyDuBxgc81I9uU3Ayx71GSuefp6Zosg1Jvtkn/Pef/v63+NH2yT/nvP8A9/W/xqnR RyoLsufbJP8AnvP/AN/W/wAaPtkn/Pef/v63+NU6kMLfZxNuUqW247g0cqDUsfbJP+e8/wD39b/G j7ZJ/wA95/8Av63+NU6KOVBdlz7ZJ/z3n/7+t/jR9sk/57z/APf1v8ap0UcqC7Ln2yT/AJ7z/wDf 1v8AGj7ZJ/z3n/7+t/jVOijlQXZc+2Sf895/+/rf40fbJP8AnvP/AN/W/wAap0UcqC7Ln2yT/nvP /wB/W/xo+2Sf895/+/rf41Too5UF2XPtkn/Pef8A...

...iGF at K(?owSNt%}8!|1dB`8^U92*4V^9}7DuVPI+0e{WV z<Pqp{klDk;g;sguIy0oT5$Ca<@O8ok)!zDoU`?RDpv+eguJx5mH at u*%zMw7)=cxee z7G7XYMS(beh6~^~THn0d71RVH1!ciVReMKqU-J-|fAND4`}CL{|6s%>Hf!YBh at Iz> zm!*~iS>Y>(6F;D&n2Nd0j{OX~eRS?qqVKE)Ju~4mocR#Fe-X}k#ie(debpoIzHv&$ z&e5t*us~j971);tkN^x>fjr4nf~}y9+NM1(t1By$XL_L<0pag(9JMN-$r;gZ6xKz8 zVu%i}6)~#oaMTe$LU0TZhAIZa?Qq7Pgk at M?R%15;hWXo<?){3jYJZI`KhlVgkn)!z zdSxIO4C%5cxjZG|NXB5&L;ewJzv2w at EPhMKTOlr9y9P(N?YP(|S+C+gMTI39(&e!; zgs0;)zs`z*8KT2dm6*7GD-AM1D1|E~<kUB09!^~~KGU}0l#&vNm%j$Lj{8k#oSCk8 znmLz3qe9+LeE}^9Ru(v...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I wonder if anyone has run tc on an e.g. dual processor system? As far as I know under linux-2.6 it is possible that two processors receive and process packets of one NIC. Is this right? And if yes, does it work fine? Any hint is welcome! Thanks Andreas -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)