search for: tippingstructur

...ws ACLS and it was an interesting experience, but for me I > think the POSIX ACLs are easier to understand and troubleshoot. That may > just be because I am more of a Linux admin than a Windows admin. > > Mark > > On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 12:04 PM, Mark Nienberg < > mnlists at tippingstructural.com> wrote: > >> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 12:38 PM, Rowland Penny via samba < >> samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >> >>> have you given Domain Admins the required rights ? >>> >>> net rpc rights grant DOMAIN\\"Domain Admins" >&gt...

On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Mark Nienberg < mnlists at tippingstructural.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Trenta sis via samba < > samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> We have detected that machines with dhcp (It was configured as is >> described >> in samba wiki dhcp and samba 4) are updating correclty and any...

...work with samba as an AD DC, but should still work fine on > other configurations (member server, legacy DC, etc). If you are running > with a non ad dc config, let us know, there may be a bug there. > > Ricky > > On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Mark Nienberg < > mnlists at tippingstructural.com> wrote: > >> In Samba 4.1 I get the following output for smbstatus: >> Samba version 4.1.1 >> >> PID Username Group Machine >> ------------------------------------------------------------------- >> 2482 john Everyone...

...me I > think the POSIX ACLs are easier to understand and > troubleshoot. That may > just be because I am more of a Linux admin than a Windows admin. > > Mark > > On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 12:04 PM, Mark Nienberg < > mnlists at tippingstructural.com > <mailto:mnlists at tippingstructural.com>> wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 12:38 PM, Rowland Penny via samba < > samba at lists.samba.org <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>> wrote: > > have you given Dom...

On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 12:38 PM, Rowland Penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > have you given Domain Admins the required rights ? > > net rpc rights grant DOMAIN\\"Domain Admins" > SeDiskOperatorPrivilege -UAdministrator > Yes. I followed this wiki example: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Shares_with_Windows_ACLs Here is some output: [nienberg at

In Samba 4.1 I get the following output for smbstatus: Samba version 4.1.1 PID Username Group Machine ------------------------------------------------------------------- 2482 john Everyone 10.0.0.109 (ipv4:10.0.0.109:49178) 7364 george Everyone 10.0.0.60 (ipv4:10.0.0.60:49232) In Samba 3.6 it was like this: Samba version 3.6.24 PID

...9;t think it has been updated to work with samba as an AD DC, but should still work fine on other configurations (member server, legacy DC, etc). If you are running with a non ad dc config, let us know, there may be a bug there. Ricky On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Mark Nienberg < mnlists at tippingstructural.com> wrote: > > In Samba 4.1 I get the following output for smbstatus: > Samba version 4.1.1 > > PID Username Group Machine > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > 2482 john Everyone 10.0.0.109 (ipv4:1...

...erience, but for me >> I >> think the POSIX ACLs are easier to understand and troubleshoot. That may >> just be because I am more of a Linux admin than a Windows admin. >> >> Mark >> >> On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 12:04 PM, Mark Nienberg < >> mnlists at tippingstructural.com> wrote: >> >> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 12:38 PM, Rowland Penny via samba < >>> samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >>> >>> have you given Domain Admins the required rights ? >>>> >>>> net rpc rights grant DOMAIN\\"Domain...

Well, I created a bug report for this issue. Seems that none of the developers has picked up on it. https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13214 On 16 January 2018 at 19:47, Mark Nienberg <mnlists at tippingstructural.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 7:34 AM, Kristján Valur Jónsson via samba < > samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> >> I have finally traced this problem down to a *reload* of named.conf, that >> occurs as part of a logrotate. >> >> Has a...

Hello there. I´ve been having problems with dynamic dns update by dhcp on my samba ADDC running on CentOS 7 on an RPI2. After a while, the dhccp_dyndns.sh stops stops being able to authenticate with named. for the longest time I was stumped with this, exploring all kinds of kerberos issues, but found out that *restartint* named did resolve the issue. I have finally traced this problem down to a

Hi, With samba 4.4.5 with bind DLZ we have detected an error message with machines that has static ip Oct 8 16:52:47 server named[4247]: samba_dlz: starting transaction on zone domain.com Oct 8 16:52:47 server named[4247]: client 172.22.187.193#55746: update ' domain.com/IN' denied Oct 8 16:52:47 server named[4247]: samba_dlz: cancelling transaction on zone domain.com Oct 8 16:52:47

Hi, I've inherited our Devocot setup from someone else & don't know much about it. I can view our Public email folders fine in Thunderbird, but when I try it with Outlook 2013, I can see the folder structure fine, but when I click on a folder it doesn't show any emails. Here's a screen shot of Outlook: https://imgur.com/CHIDJOr And Thunderbird: https://imgur.com/WxmsUTM

On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 2:08 PM, Denis BUCHER <dbucherml at hsolutions.ch> wrote: > > It looks like you are trying to do the same as I did. Did you read the > thread I had some days ago with subject "How to copy roaming profiles to > new server ? ("Group policy client service failed. The logon access is > denied")" ? > Yes, I read that thread. However,

On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 10:00 AM, MI <mi.lists at alma.ch> wrote: > And of course, the important related question: Keep it an NT4 domain, or > upgrade to AD? It's a good question, and I am struggling with it too. My network is about twice as large as yours, but still small by most standards. We have samba 3.6 sernet packages on a CentOS 5 server. Clearly it would be pretty

We recently upgraded our samba 3.6 network to samba 4.2.3. It is still a NT-style domain. The underlying OS was upgraded from CentOS 5 to CentOS 7. The profiles share is set up like this: [profiles] comment = Roaming Profiles path = /mnt/share2/ntprofiles browseable = no writable = yes csc policy = disable create mask = 0600 directory mask

I have an old CentOS 6 machine that needs to mount a share from a samba active directory. It was working when the AD DC was running samba 4.4.5, but it stopped working when the AD DC was updated to 4.5.6. In both cases the samba member server that hosts the share is running 4.5.6. The version of cifs-utils on the CentOS 6 machine is 4.8.1. The same samba share can be mounted successfully from a

On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 1:33 PM, Dale Schroeder < dale at briannassaladdressing.com> wrote: > > > Try the "vers=3.0" option. That's what fixed mine. > > I suspect my old version of cifs-utils doesn't understand that option. Note the output says "vers=3.0,ver=1": mount.cifs --verbose //192.168.254.35/projects /mnt/smb -o

I upgraded a domain member server from 4.5.5 to 4.6.2. After some initial tests, where everything seemed to be working fine, I upgraded the OS from CentOS 7.3 to 7.4. Now I have intermittent problems with domain users trying to log in to the member server over ssh. After a bunch of troubleshooting I determined that winbind sometimes returns the user home directory and shell incorrectly and

In trying to diagnose a domain member server problem after a samba upgrade, I was tempted to roll back my server to a VMware snapshot taken before the upgrade. However, when I looked at the log file "log-wb-DOMAIN" I saw an entry that the server had changed its password on the DC since the snapshot. How do I handle this if I have to roll back? Will I have to join the domain again? Is it

On 8/19/2020 12:40 PM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 19/08/2020 20:27, Barry Ralphs via samba wrote: >> On 8/19/2020 12:02 PM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>> On 19/08/2020 19:29, Barry Ralphs via samba wrote: >>>> We recently upgraded Samba on our DC from 4.7.6-0 to 4.11.9-3. >>>> >>>> ??????? # samba BIND9_DLZ >>>>