search for: tiniest

ELLCC is a compilation tool chain based on clang/LLVM, libc++ and the musl standard C library for Linux. Recently I was asked if ELLCC pre-built binaries could be used to build clang/LLVM TOT. It turns out that it can with some simple patches. This is a simple way to bootstrap clang/LLVM on an arbitrary Linux system that either doesn't have GCC or has a version of GCC that is too old to

Hi list! I am running CentOS 4.1 x86_64 on an Athlon64. The box was installed only yesterday. Yesterday I was still able to compil stuff, yesterday even the tiniest and simplest programs fail to compile always with internal compiler error: Segmentation fault. For example: make -C /usr/src/linux-2.6 SUBDIRS=/tmp/bristuff-0.2.0-RC8n/qozap ZAP=-I/tmp/bristuff-0.2.0-RC8n/zaptel-1.0.9 modules make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/kernels/2.6.9-11.EL-x86_64'...

...the used loader(s), provided an instance of MEMDISK is found. Booting a CD, then chaining to floppy/HD from isolinux.cfg means not loading MEMDISK though. Basicly, I'd like to detect if ELTORITO.SYS should be loaded instead of awaiting its loading succes/failure. * How would one create the tiniest uncompressed ISO possible? It seems like MKISOFS does some padding up to 600KB or so at minimum. My objective is a tiny ISO placed on diskette to test ELTORITO stuff: fd0 -> syslinux -> memdisk -> tiny.iso -> isolinux -> chain.c32 fd0 -> devload eltorito.sys /D:MEMCD Running i...

...t; * sys/time.h: not sure this exists on all systems. What are we using > that depends on it and what guards does that source have? I'll verify why this was added. It was a while ago. > * "and" as an operator? I know C allows it, but it's highly > unidiomatic. </tiniest nit in the world> I just copied what was already there. </tiniest rationalization in the world> -Rich > > Cheers. > > Tim. >

...r(v1[,2], v2[,2]) [1] 0.9727502 > cor(v1[,3], v2[,3]) [1] 0.9411287 I even tried compiling with gcc with and without optimisation, and I got different results for exactly the same input (no saving to file first). So, I gather that sammon() is an unstable function, extremely sensitive to the tiniest of variations. Is this inherent to the sammon algorithm, or is there something wrong with how it is implemented in R? -- Peter Kleiweg http://www.let.rug.nl/~kleiweg/ -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien...

I''ve just dabbled the tiniest bit in AJAX, but I have an app with a grid of text_fields (each row of text_fields being a row from the database, and I would like the user to be able to navigate between fields with the arrow keys in a spreasheet-like fashion. Is this reasonably doable? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.co...

...original sweep. The original sweep stops pretty close to 24 kHz. > Exactly. The spectrogram shows you the frequencies present in the signal. > Pressing Play relies on Golden Ears (TM). Since I aimed for a degree in music composition, it was in my best interest to learn to hear even the tiniest details. The only drawback is that nowadays my hearing stops somewhere around 16 kHz and I can still clearly remember the days when I was able to hear things up to 20 kHz. Petr

Hi, Is anyone here using OrderlyStats with asterisk in a call center setting? If so what what is your experience with it? Is that software really free for asterisk users? Or is there a better option out there? Thanks,

Hey, A question of a Tux/Wine Newbie. There's a how-to using Xfire with wine in the appdb, I shall compile it from source using GCC-4.5. But I only know how to compile a single file with it or using the standard 'make' command, how it's shown in the Wine-Wiki. I googled for a tutorial, but didn't found anything. Can anyone help me with it giving a small help? In thanks, CF

LNT executes: cc_version = capture([cc, '-v', '-E'] + cc_flags + ['-x', 'c', '/dev/null', '-###'], include_stderr=True).strip() Then parses the result Perhaps that output has changed in an unexpected way? > On Aug 6, 2014, at 3:06 PM, Chris Matthews <chris.matthews at apple.com> wrote:

...off parts of the optimizers ;) > But users are also not testing how fast deterministic code which LLVM is completely removing can go. This intrinsic prevents LLVM from correctly thinking the code is deterministic (or that a value isn't used) so that measurements are (at the very least, the tiniest bit) meaningful. I'm not saying this intrinsic will make all benchmarks meaningful (and I >> can't), I'm saying that it would be useful in Rust in ensuring that >> tests/benches aren't invalidated simply because a computation wasn't >> performed. >> >...

...k. >> I'm always lost in how do we handle *all* the corner cases that are not even used anywhere at all, but care about the conditions we have in the code. Especially when it's constantly changing. So thanks for jumping in. I only replied because nobody else did and I had only the tiniest clue as to what could happen. >> Using root_squash is very "finicky" (to say the least)... It wasn't >> really clear from what you posted how you are attempting to reference >> things. Does the "/var/lib/one//datastores/0/38/deployment.0" XML file >>...

...tatically analyzable pairings, I would've made start return type {} and have the end intrinsic take that as an argument, like I did for the invariant intrinsics.) You can almost entirely model lifetime.start and lifetime.end as being a store of undef to the address. However, they're the tiniest bit stronger. With a store of undef, you can delete stores that precede (with no intervening load) and loads that follow (with no intervening store). On top of that, a start lets you delete loads that precede, and an end lets you delete stores that follow. > If so, I guess that in order to...

So, in hacking on mem2reg I noticed that it doesn't actually implement optimizations enabled by lifetime markers. I thought I might take a stab at teaching it about them, but I'm left with some questions about the semantics. Much of this may have been hash out when they were added, and if so I'll appreciate your help educating me, and maybe we can come up with improved documentation to

...lost in how do we handle *all* the corner cases that are not >> even used anywhere at all, but care about the conditions we have in the >> code. Especially when it's constantly changing. So thanks for jumping >> in. I only replied because nobody else did and I had only the tiniest >> clue as to what could happen. >> I saw the post, but was heads down somewhere else. Suffice to say trying to swap in root_squash is a painful exercise... John [...]

How should I expect the performance of this function to be? I wrote this code: function CreateTOC(){ var $aTOC = document.getElementsByClassName(''tocitem''); if(isArray($aTOC)){ $temp = ''<INPUT TYPE="SUBMIT" NAME="cmdSave_Update" VALUE="Close" CLASS="menubuttons"> ''; $temp += ''<INPUT

On Aug 07 10:08:43, petrparizek2000 at yahoo.com wrote: > > What sine sweep exactly? > > An exponential sweep. It started slightly below 24 Hz and ended almost at 24 > kHz. And it was 50 seconds long. > > > How did you obtain it, > > I used Angelo Farina's "Aurora" modules. One of them is called "Generate > sine sweep". Can you please

...do we handle *all* the corner cases that are not >>> even used anywhere at all, but care about the conditions we have in the >>> code. Especially when it's constantly changing. So thanks for jumping >>> in. I only replied because nobody else did and I had only the tiniest >>> clue as to what could happen. >>> > I saw the post, but was heads down somewhere else. Suffice to say trying > to swap in root_squash is a painful exercise... > > > John > > [...] > > _______________________________________________ > libvirt-users...

On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 9:16 PM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote: > I'm very unclear and why you think a generic black box intrinsic will have > any different performance impact ;-) > > > I'm also unclear on what the goal with this intrinsic is. > I understand the symptoms you are trying to solve - what exactly is the > disease. > > IE you say

>> Oh, I was reading "precedes/following" as having static (dominance) >> meaning. That is, in the above example you could not delete the store >> since it is not true that >> llvm.lifetime.end dominates it. >> >> Nick, is this what you had in mind? If not, then we must delete a >> matching llvm.lifetime.end, but it is not clear how we define