Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "ting_active_directori".
Did you mean:
ting_active_directory
2020 Oct 12
1
BIND9 failing
Forgot this one.
systemctl edit bind9
#/etc/systemd/system/bind9.service.d/override.conf is created.
# add below.
[Service]
# Disable reloading completely.
ExecReload=
# Or set it to restart
#ExecReload=/usr/sbin/rndc restart
Greetz,
Louis
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens
> L.P.H. van Belle via samba
>
2019 Jan 30
0
preparing a 2nd DC
I only see one error here.
Debian 9.6 .. Update to 9.7 ;-) :-P
Because of : https://www.debian.org/security/2019/dsa-4371
Looks good Stefan.
It the preseed on github still the same?
Working at things here also. .. Bit to much things but ok. Fun things :-)
Greetz,
Louis
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens
>
2020 Oct 12
4
BIND9 failing
I am working towards joining my second DC to the first.
If I am understanding:
https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Joining_a_Samba_DC_to_an_Existing_Active_Directory
correctly I am to get bind9 working properly before the join should happen.
I am getting this:
> root at dc2:~# systemctl status bind9
>
> ? bind9.service - BIND Domain Name Server
>
> Loaded: loaded
2018 Nov 29
4
samba_dnsupdate REFUSED between Samba4 AD DC and Win 2008r2
Il 29/11/2018 15:22, Rowland Penny via samba ha scritto:
> On Thu, 29 Nov 2018 15:03:03 +0100
> "L.P.H. van Belle via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
>
>> You dns keytab looks strange, my be due to manual changes..
> It looks strange because there is one of these missing:
>
> 1 DNS/mysamba4dc.mydomain.com at MYDOMAIN.COM
>
> Could be cut &
2017 Dec 28
0
2nd samba DC: NT_STATUS_NO_LOGON_SERVERS
Hai Stephan,
You need also this in smb.conf
# enable offline logins
winbind offline logon = yes
I did also test my logins with one DC turned off.
And login on the DM is no problem or my pcs, no problem.
I did not test the AD logins thats because these have only linux logins for maintainance.
And that always works.
In a 2 DC setup, setup your nameservers first to the LAN ip of the
2019 Jan 30
4
preparing a 2nd DC
greetings, samba-users,
I am currently preparing to join a second Samba-DC to a Samba-based ADS.
DC1 is a debian-9.6 machine, running samba-4.8.8 from Louis' repos.
DC2 is basically identically set up (thank you, ansible) and I read and
followed (1) so far, except the actual join.
sysvol-rsync, kerberos ticket, modified smb.conf, resolv.conf ... done
I assume 4.8.8 will give me no
2017 Dec 28
2
2nd samba DC: NT_STATUS_NO_LOGON_SERVERS
I added a 2nd DC (ADC2) to a samba-ADS today.
debian-9.3, samba-4.6.11 from Louis
followed
https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Joining_a_Samba_DC_to_an_Existing_Active_Directory
replication works afai see
-
We wanted to test services after turning off the first DC, and running
ADC2 and a DM file-server only.
DC1/backup: 10.0.0.224
ADC2: 10.0.0.230
We then get NT_STATUS_NO_LOGON_SERVERS
On the
2018 Aug 21
0
Samba 4.8.4 + BIND 9.9.4 - possibility of nonsecure DNS updates
; TSIG error with server: tsig verify failure
Mayabe update/setup your TSIG key.
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/openshift_enterprise/2/html/puppet_deployment_guide/generating_a_bind_tsig_key
Im also wondering why RH is using : '--disable-isc-spnego'
Greetz,
Louis
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org]
2018 Aug 21
3
Samba 4.8.4 + BIND 9.9.4 - possibility of nonsecure DNS updates
> So you never read this:
> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Changing_the_DNS_Back_End_of_a_Samba_AD_DC
> Which means that you probably never ran the aptly named
> 'samba_upgradedns'Of course I ran this. Many times. I'm not stupid, Rowland. At least I can read:D
If I've seen that Bind doesn't work, I had to change backend to internal DNS.I carefully read and made