search for: tindal

...by name" and I'm wondering how to do this can omega search files by name directly? how should I build the query? could I use scriptindex to index, eg., the locate database? how? should I index file names directly? can omindex do this or should I use scriptindex? how? thanks in advice tindal

On 08/02/15 05:09, S.Tindall wrote: > On Sat, 2015-02-07 at 23:06 -0500, Mark LaPierre wrote: >> Hey all, >> >> On my X86-64 CentOS 6.6 machine I just ran yum update. In the update >> was an upgrade from the 340.XX Nvidia package to the 346.XX package. >> Hrmmm? I'm thinking this is not...

There was an interesting note in a recent fedoraproject.org newsletter regarding Redhat's legal views on referring to others' trademarks. Since the comments are lengthy, they are not reproduced here and are available at the links below. FWN/Issue161: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FWN/Issue161#Legal Callaway note:

Hello All, on a Centos5 system installed with software raid I'm getting: raid1: raid set md127 active with 2 out of 2 mirrors md:.... autorun DONE md: Autodetecting RAID arrays md: autorun..... md : autorun DONE trying to resume form /dev/md1 creating root device mounting root device mounting root filesystem ext3-fs : unable to read superblock mount :

...password server = ATLED passwd program = /usr/local/samba/bin/smbpasswd username map = /usr/local/samba/lib/users.map read size = 8192 socket options = TCP_NODELAY lm announce = True local master = No browse list = No wins server = 193.128.218.153 unix realname = Yes admin users = root mtindall sburch mwaller hosts allow = 194.202.25. 193.128.218. 10.1.1. 10.1.4. queuepause command = enable %p short preserve case = No [homes] comment = Home directories username = %S read only = No [printers] comment = Shared Printers path = /var/spool/samba create mask = 0600 print ok = Yes...

On 02/08/15 06:12, Ned Slider wrote: > > On 08/02/15 05:09, S.Tindall wrote: > Yes, just to reiterate: > > yum erase kmod-nvidia > yum install kmod-nvidia-340xx > reboot > > You will then be on the correct driver branch and will get the > appropriate driver updates going forwards, no changes to yum necessary. > > _______________________...

Hi , currently i have 2 raid devices /dev/md0 and /dev/md1 , i have added 2 new disks, fdisked , created 2 primary partitions with type fd (linux raid autodetect) Now i want to create raid from them root at vmhost1 ~]# mdadm --create --verbose /dev/md2 --level=1 /dev/sdc1 /dev/sdd1 mdadm: error opening /dev/md2: No such file or directory will return that error, what shouldi do? Thanks!

Hello all, I wanted to create a Raid0 partition using LVM based on 2 LUNs available; I was unable to find an LVM GUI selection in the System->Adminsitration selection in the gui .... system-config-lvm is not available. What am I missing during the installation? thanks in advance, -- best, Vince

On 08/02/15 12:33, Pete Geenhuizen wrote: > > On 02/08/15 06:12, Ned Slider wrote: >> >> On 08/02/15 05:09, S.Tindall wrote: >> Yes, just to reiterate: >> >> yum erase kmod-nvidia >> yum install kmod-nvidia-340xx >> reboot >> >> You will then be on the correct driver branch and will get the >> appropriate driver updates going forwards, no changes to yum necessary. &...

Can someone help me figure out what I have to do about to get update to work with this happening: Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package kexec-tools.i386 0:1.102pre-56.el5_3.2 set to be updated ---> Package file.i386 0:4.17-15.el5_3.1 set to be updated ---> Package pango.i386 0:1.14.9-5.el5.centos set to be updated ---> Package pango-devel.i386

I hear that backuppc does *not* have a native *Doze client. On the other hand, I know amanda's been around a long time, and it does. Opinions on amanda, folks? mark

Hey all, On my X86-64 CentOS 6.6 machine I just ran yum update. In the update was an upgrade from the 340.XX Nvidia package to the 346.XX package. Hrmmm? I'm thinking this is not a good idea but, since this is just a test system any way, I let it run. Sure enough I was right. Dmesg says that my video is supported by the 340.XX driver, not the 346.XX driver. It's not happy cause it

...all]' started. ; ModuleID = 'llvm_structfunccall_test' %0 = type { i32, i32 } declare i64* @testLLVMStructFuncCall(%0) define i64* @0() { entry: %0 = call i64* @testLLVMStructFuncCall(%0 { i32 10, i32 25 }) ret i64* %0 } 2011-06-20 21:25:54.821 otest-x86_64[3369:707] 10 0 /Users/mtindal/Projects/Silver/Tests/SVFunctionTests.m:576: error: -[SVFunctionTests testLLVMStructFuncCall] : Expected <35>, but was <10> Test Case '-[SVFunctionTests testLLVMStructFuncCall]' failed (0.016 seconds). The module dump suggests everything is right, i can see in the function call...

On Sat, 2015-02-07 at 23:06 -0500, Mark LaPierre wrote: > Hey all, > > On my X86-64 CentOS 6.6 machine I just ran yum update. In the update > was an upgrade from the 340.XX Nvidia package to the 346.XX package. > Hrmmm? I'm thinking this is not a good idea but, since this is just a > test system any way, I let it run. Sure enough I was right. Dmesg says > that my

On Tue, 2015-03-17 at 23:28 +0100, johan.vermeulen7 at telenet.be wrote: > > on a Centos5 system installed with software raid I'm getting: > > raid1: raid set md127 active with 2 out of 2 mirrors > > md:.... autorun DONE > > md: Autodetecting RAID arrays > > md: autorun..... > > md : autorun DONE > > trying to resume form /dev/md1 Hi

On Wed, 2015-07-15 at 16:29 -0400, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > I hear that backuppc does *not* have a native *Doze client... It is simple to set up a rsyncd server under Cygwin / WinX to feed BackupPC. I normally install "full" cygwin to access rsyncd, but there is a limited client available. http://sourceforge.net/projects/backuppc/files/cygwin-rsyncd/3.0.9.0/ >From the