search for: tims_tank

Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "tims_tank".

2017 Feb 13
2
NUT configuration complicated by Stonith/Fencing cabling
On 02/13/2017 04:39 PM, Charles Lepple wrote: > On Feb 13, 2017, at 8:08 AM, Tim Richards <tims_tank at hotmail.com> wrote: >> Feb 13 23:11:42 systemd[1] Starting LSB: UPS monitoring software (deprecated, remote/local)... >> Feb 13 23:11:43 usbhid-ups[2093] Startup successful >> Feb 13 23:11:43 upsd[1 932] Starting NUT UPS drivers ..done >> Feb 13 23:11:43 upsd[21 04] no...
2017 Feb 13
2
NUT configuration complicated by Stonith/Fencing cabling
...-----Original Message----- From: Charles Lepple [mailto:clepple at gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, 12 February 2017 11:57 AM To: Tim Richards Cc: nut-upsuser Mailing List Subject: Re: [Nut-upsuser] NUT configuration complicated by Stonith/Fencing cabling On Feb 10, 2017, at 5:48 PM, Tim Richards <tims_tank at hotmail.com> wrote: > > I am trying to kill two birds with one stone, that is UPS protection from power failure and cluster node fencing (Stonith) with the UPS ability to cut power to a node. Somebody has done this, as there exists a fencing agent using NUT in the Pacemaker/Corosync (L...
2017 Feb 14
0
NUT configuration complicated by Stonith/Fencing cabling
...o shoot (fence) each other. But that's fine, someone will be there checking why only one UPS has died. That's enough high availability for this use. Hope this configuration is useful to someone else. Regards, Tim. -----Original Message----- From: Nut-upsuser [mailto:nut-upsuser-bounces+tims_tank=hotmail.com at lists.alioth.debian.org] On Behalf Of Manuel Wolfshant Sent: Tuesday, 14 February 2017 1:53 AM To: nut-upsuser Mailing List Subject: Re: [Nut-upsuser] NUT configuration complicated by Stonith/Fencing cabling On 02/13/2017 04:39 PM, Charles Lepple wrote: > On Feb 13, 2017, at 8:08...
2017 Feb 10
2
NUT configuration complicated by Stonith/Fencing cabling
...e UPS ability to cut power to a node. Somebody has done this, as there exists a fencing agent using NUT in the Pacemaker/Corosync (Linux-HA cluster software), I just don't know the best way to go about it. Regards, Tim. -----Original Message----- From: Nut-upsuser [mailto:nut-upsuser-bounces+tims_tank=hotmail.com at lists.alioth.debian.org] On Behalf Of Roger Price Sent: Friday, 10 February 2017 11:17 PM To: nut-upsuser Mailing List Subject: Re: [Nut-upsuser] NUT configuration complicated by Stonith/Fencing cabling On Sun, 5 Feb 2017, Tim Richards wrote: > Setup: Active/Passive Two Node Clu...
2017 Feb 12
0
NUT configuration complicated by Stonith/Fencing cabling
On Feb 10, 2017, at 5:48 PM, Tim Richards <tims_tank at hotmail.com> wrote: > > I am trying to kill two birds with one stone, that is UPS protection from power failure and cluster node fencing (Stonith) with the UPS ability to cut power to a node. Somebody has done this, as there exists a fencing agent using NUT in the Pacemaker/Corosync (L...
2017 Feb 13
0
NUT configuration complicated by Stonith/Fencing cabling
On Feb 13, 2017, at 8:08 AM, Tim Richards <tims_tank at hotmail.com> wrote: > > Feb 13 23:11:42 systemd[1] Starting LSB: UPS monitoring software (deprecated, remote/local)... > Feb 13 23:11:43 usbhid-ups[2093] Startup successful > Feb 13 23:11:43 upsd[1 932] Starting NUT UPS drivers ..done > Feb 13 23:11:43 upsd[21 04] not listenin...
2017 Feb 05
2
NUT configuration complicated by Stonith/Fencing cabling
Hello List, Any suggestions to solve the following would be most appreciated. Setup: Active/Passive Two Node Cluster. Two UPSes (APC Smart-UPS 1500 C) with USB communication cables cross connected (ie UPS-webserver1 monitored by webserver2, and vice versa) to allow for stonith/fencing OS OpenSuse Leap 42.2 NUT version 2.7.1-2.41-x86_64 Fencing agent: external/nut Problem: When power fails to a