search for: timing_10_adrcmd_t

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "timing_10_adrcmd_t".

2017 Apr 10
0
[PATCH 03/11] nvkm/gddr5: MR calculation for timing table v1.0
...; unsigned timing_10_ODT:3; + unsigned timing_10_DS:2; /* empty: 15 */ unsigned timing_10_10:8; /* empty: 17 */ @@ -139,7 +140,8 @@ struct nvbios_ramcfg { unsigned timing_10_CWL:8; unsigned timing_10_FAW:8; unsigned timing_10_CKE:8; - /* empty: 22, 23 */ + unsigned timing_10_ADRCMD_T:8; /* XXX: [3:2]? */ + /* empty: 23 */ unsigned timing_10_18:8; }; struct { diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/bios/rammap.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/bios/rammap.c index 131d967..0d517a0 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/bios/rammap.c +++ b/dri...
2017 Apr 10
11
Preparations for Fermi DRAM clock changes
No, no, these will not implement Fermi reclocking. This set of patches contains some of the preparatory work that I deem stable enough to move upstream. Notable changes - Training pattern upload routines from GK104+ now shared with GT215+ - Timing calculation for Fermi - GDDR5 MR calculation from VBIOS timing table v1.0. Also useful for that pesky GT 240. - A routine to translate a VBIOS init
2017 Apr 10
14
RESEND Preparations for Fermi DRAM clock changes
Two patches went missing as a result of PEBCAK. No v2 marks as nothing changed really. Just resending for easier enforcement of patch order in other people's trees. Sorry for the noise. Original message: No, no, these will not implement Fermi reclocking. This set of patches contains some of the preparatory work that I deem stable enough to move upstream. Notable changes - Training pattern