Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "timesink".
2008 Jun 10
3
Newer GNOME than base release
I have asked about this before, but I don't have a workable answer yet.
I would like to know if there is a way to install a more recent GNOME
package on CentOS 5.x than 2.16.0.
1) GNOME Bugzilla does not support this version any more - all bugs go
into the bit bucket.
2) Having been exposed to Fedora 8 at work and seeing how much more
flexible GNOME 2.22 is, I would REALLY like to take a
2004 Sep 16
0
[LLVMdev] To APR Or Not To APR. That is the question.
Reid,
Adding APR as one possible implementation of lib/System makes sense,
and is what I originally suggested when I brought up the question of
using APR. In particular, I agree that we want to keep APR or any
other similar layer encapsulated behind lib/System.
--Vikram
http://www.cs.uiuc.edu/~vadve
http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/
On Sep 13, 2004, at 10:34 AM, Reid Spencer wrote:
> John,
>
2004 Sep 13
7
[LLVMdev] To APR Or Not To APR. That is the question.
John,
If we were to do this, I don't think that adding it to the LLVM source
base is the right way to go. We would simply use "configure" to find the
library and header files. The moment we put APR into our source base, it
would be out of date. Keeping it up to date would not be fun for anyone
and there's no reason for us to do that. Furthermore, this approach
completely avoids