search for: timeoutworker

On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 11:38 AM, Jonathan Turner <probata at hotmail.com> wrote: > With gcc -O3 4.2 and 4.4 we match 1.0s.   The LLVM, after running it through > opt -std-compile-opts, is around 1.7s. Hmm, on my computer, I get around 2.5 seconds with both gcc -O3 and llvm-gcc -O3 (using llvm-gcc from svn). Not sure what you're doing differently; I wouldn't be surprised if

I was playing around in x86 assembly the other day, looking at ways to optimize my cooperative multitasking system. Currently, it uses a 'timeout' counter that is decremented each time through a loop, letting me stop the loop and go to the next cooperative thread if the loop runs a little long. The asm has two overlapping loops: --- _main: mov ecx, 1000000000 timeoutloop:

Hi , I was wondering if anyone else has tried to use the Timeout::timeout method in a backgroundrb Worker and had Timeout raise an exception after the allotted amount of time . I ask because i have written a test script to make sure Timeout would work . I have tested the script by directly feeding it to ruby with : $ ruby test_script.rb and piping the script to the rails console: $

> Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 13:41:45 -0800 > From: eli.friedman at gmail.com > To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Tight overlapping loops and performance > > Hmm, on my computer, I get around 2.5 seconds with both gcc -O3 and > llvm-gcc -O3 (using llvm-gcc from svn). Not sure what you're doing > differently; I wouldn't be surprised if it's