search for: timeold

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "timeold".

2016 Jun 19
5
rsync script for snapshot backups
...le enough scenario to achieve it with my pathetic scripting skills. This is what i came up with: #!/bin/sh # rsync copy script for rsync pull from FreeNAS to BackupNAS for Buero dataset # Set variables EXPIRED=`date +"%d-%m-%Y" -d "14 days ago"` # Copy previous timefile to timeold.txt if it exists if [ -f "/volume1/rsync/Buero/timenow.txt" ] then yes | cp /volume1/rsync/Buero/timenow.txt /volume1/rsync/Buero/timeold.txt fi # Create current timefile echo `date +"%d-%m-%Y-%H%M"` > /volume1/rsync/Buero/timenow.txt # rsync command if [ -f "...
2017 Dec 09
2
[cfe-dev] Who wants faster LLVM/Clang builds?
...e a look at files related to their components and pick the parts of the patches that they consider correct. I'll also start with some files next week if there is no objections to it. Does it sound reasonable? The most impacted files (the numbers are for Debug build): LLVM top 10 Filename TimeOld TimeNew Delta SizeOld SizeNew SizeDelta lib/CodeGen/GlobalISel/GlobalISel.cpp 0.26 0.02 -91.6% 35.0 0.3 -99.0% lib/MC/MCLabel.cpp 0.20 0.02 -88.0% 25.5 0.0 -99.9% tools/llvm-readobj/ObjDumper.cpp 0.44 0.10 -76.8% 41.0 11.8 -71.1% lib/MC/MCWinEH.cpp 0.49 0.15 -70.4% 43.9 21.4 -51.2% lib/...
2017 Dec 15
3
[cfe-dev] Who wants faster LLVM/Clang builds?
...eir components and pick the parts of the > patches that they consider correct. I'll also start with some files next > week if there is no objections to it. Does it sound reasonable? > > The most impacted files (the numbers are for Debug build): > > *LLVM top 10* > *Filename TimeOld TimeNew Delta **SizeOld SizeNew SizeDelta* > lib/CodeGen/GlobalISel/GlobalISel.cpp 0.26 0.02 -91.6% 35.0 0.3 -99.0% > lib/MC/MCLabel.cpp 0.20 0.02 -88.0% 25.5 0.0 -99.9% > tools/llvm-readobj/ObjDumper.cpp 0.44 0.10 -76.8% 41.0 11.8 -71.1% > lib/MC/MCWinEH.cpp 0.49 0.15 -70.4% 43.9 21.4...
2017 Dec 06
3
[cfe-dev] Who wants faster LLVM/Clang builds?
- We do indeed have a lot of unnecessary includes around in llvm (or pretty much any other C++ project for that matter). - I want faster builds. - The only way to reliably fight this is indeed automatic tools. - Having the right amount of includes also has documentation value and ideally let's you understand the structure of your project. - However relying on transitive includes works contrary