search for: tilix

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "tilix".

Did you mean: telix
2017 Aug 02
4
Fedora bugs and EOL [was Re: CentOS users: please try and provide feedback on Fedora] Boltron
...omething like that, but it didn?t have containers. > > Why hasn?t a container manager like that already been invented? Or has > it? > > Wouldn?t it be much better being able to do this without needing > containers? Sure there is such a thing. It's a tiled console package (tilix is what I use). In all honesty, I wouldn't want Libreoffice running in a container and I can't imagine why you'd want an xterm in its own container. Most containers I've built have been RESTful API containers, NGINX proxies/web servers, etc. I spend more time on the container...
2017 Aug 02
0
Fedora bugs and EOL [was Re: CentOS users: please try and provide feedback on Fedora] Boltron
On Wed, 2 Aug 2017, Mark Haney wrote: > Sure there is such a thing. It's a tiled console package (tilix is what I > use). In all honesty, I wouldn't want Libreoffice running in a container and > I can't imagine why you'd want an xterm in its own container. Most > containers I've built have been RESTful API containers, NGINX proxies/web > servers, etc. I spend more t...
2017 Aug 03
0
Fedora bugs and EOL [was Re: CentOS users: please try and provide feedback on Fedora] Boltron
...e that, but it didn?t have containers. >> >> Why hasn?t a container manager like that already been invented? Or has it? >> >> Wouldn?t it be much better being able to do this without needing containers? > > Sure there is such a thing. It's a tiled console package (tilix is what I use). I think I?ll check that out. > In all honesty, I wouldn't want Libreoffice running in a container and I can't imagine why you'd want an xterm in its own container. It was only an example. The point of doing that is to use different versions of xterm and of emacs a...
2017 Aug 02
2
Fedora bugs and EOL [was Re: CentOS users: please try and provide feedback on Fedora] Boltron
On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 03:40:42PM +0200, hw wrote: > >No, this isn't it it all. Modules are sets of packages which the > >distribution creators have selected to work together; you don't compose > >modules as an end-user. > > Then maybe my understanding of packages and/or modules is wrong. > What is considered a module? What if I replace, for example, >