search for: ticat

Hello, I have no idea how to implement the following scenario apart from running two instances of samba on the same machine... I need a setup where two different Windows users will authen- ticate with two different passwords but get mapped to the same unix user. That is JOE got password PASS1 and maps to unix user joe with uid 1000 and JACK got password PASS2 and maps to unix user joe with uid 1000 I can set up two instances of samba on the same machine with two sets of config files,...

...ello group. Sorry, if this shows twice. I have the following setup requirement, and so far searching the INET and the mailing archives has brought me nothing. I have an existing WindosNT/2k/XP domain. I need to share a directory on a Slackware 9.0 (recent samba). I need the users authenticated to the Windows Domain, but all then mapped to nobody (i.e. I do NOT want to map windows users to linux users). I tried setting up a DOMAIN auth, and it worked, however there were no users mapped to linux. I tried setting up the smbusermap like this: >>> nobody = * <<< But...

Hi there, when enabling the option PAMAuthenticationViaKbdInt, a login with password is always possible, even though when you disabled it with PasswordAuthentication no and PermitRootLogin without-password! Is this intended? Why is there no documentation about this (or at least a waring in the default configuration file)? The problem is, it i...

...hell user who is able to login to his accounts via sshd on FreeBSD 8.2 using any password. The user had a .ssh/id_rsa and .ssh/id_rsa.pub key pair without a password but nullok was not specified, so I think this should be considered a bug. During diagnosis, /etc/pam.d/sshd was configured for authentication using: ------------- auth required pam_ssh.so no_warn try_first_pass ------------- I enabled _openpam_debug in pam_ssh and found this during a login via sshd to the user's account: ------------- Nov 15 09:51:53 fbsd8-i386 sshd[52853]: in pam_ssh_load_key(): f...

...ipt = /usr/sbin/useradd -d /dev/null -g smbmachines -s /bin/false -M %u domain admin group = @smbadmins cpatter sharriso ;Password Syncronization unix password sync = yes passwd program = /usr/local/bin/smbpasswd %u passwd chat = *New*password* %n\n *Retype*new*password* %n\n *passwd:*all*authen tication*tokens*updated*successfully* pam password change = Yes #domain group map = /etc/samba/group.mapping #==Shares== [homes] comment = Home Directories browseable = no writable = yes admin users = @smbadmins [profiles] path = /home/samba/profiles gu...

...Status: NEW Version: 6.0p1 Component: ssh-agent Product: Portable OpenSSH There is no way to say ssh-agent which one of keys should be used. That's why it tries to use all of them in order and if you have more than 5 keys, you will receive "Too many authentication failures for". It's bad and I have no idea how to workaround this problem without modification of source code. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug.

...759 2690 0 08:35 ? 00:00:00 gnome-power-manager root 2763 2690 0 08:35 ? 00:00:00 gnome-volume-control-applet root 2764 2690 0 08:35 ? 00:00:00 /usr/libexec/gdu-notification-da emon root 2767 2690 0 08:35 ? 00:00:00 /usr/libexec/polkit-gnome-authen tication-agent-1 root 2770 1 0 08:35 ? 00:00:00 /usr/libexec/udisks-daemon root 2773 2690 0 08:35 ? 00:00:00 bluetooth-applet root 2775 1 0 08:35 ? 00:00:00 /usr/libexec/polkit-1/polkitd root 2776 2770 0 08:35 ? 00:00:00 udisks-daemon: polling...

Hi Everyone, I'm new to * and I'm trying to setup a small configuration of SIP clients. Eventually when I get this working I plan on expanding with a Digium developers kit to add analog phones and PSTN access. My two end points are an Xten softphone and a Mitel 5055 SIP phone. Both peers seem to register with * but I cannot call to one another. When I dial the associated extension, the

maybe this is a silly question ;-) But why is it possible to login on a machine with a locked account (passwd -l ) via pubkey-authentication (authorized_keys) ? I use OpenSSH3.01p1on Solaris8 with PAM support so I thought this should not happen. If this is the normal behaviour and built in intentionally what would be the easiest way to lock an account without deleting the users authorized_keys ? If not, what output do you need to ve...