Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "thumbfunct".
Did you mean:
thumbfunc
2011 May 16
0
[LLVMdev] [Patch] Let MC/ELF generate Thumb/Thumb-2 are properly
splited patches and test cases
mc-elf-thumbfunction-bit.diff: for 1
mc-elf-arm-backend-bl-blx-sign-bit.diff: for 2.
mc-elf-thumb-bl-blx-relocation-table-entry.diff: for 3.
mc-elf-cpu-xscale-attributes.diff: for 4.
elf-thumbfunc.s: test case for 1
elf-thumbfunc-reloc.ll: test case for 2 and 3
elf-xscale-attribute.ll: test case for 4
On Fri, May...
2011 May 16
2
[LLVMdev] [Patch] Let MC/ELF generate Thumb/Thumb-2 are properly
On 11-05-16 09:21 AM, Koan-Sin Tan wrote:
> splited patches and test cases
>
> mc-elf-thumbfunction-bit.diff: for 1
> mc-elf-arm-backend-bl-blx-sign-bit.diff: for 2.
> mc-elf-thumb-bl-blx-relocation-table-entry.diff: for 3.
> mc-elf-cpu-xscale-attributes.diff: for 4.
>
> elf-thumbfunc.s: test case for 1
> elf-thumbfunc-reloc.ll: test case for 2 and 3
> elf-xscale-attribute...
2011 May 13
7
[LLVMdev] [Patch] Let MC/ELF generate Thumb/Thumb-2 are properly
Hi,
We are trying to use clang as a drop-in replacement for the gcc come with
Android NDK. I found that MC/ELF doesn't not handle Thumb functions properly,
e.g., bit 0 of the function name in the .symtab is not set to 1, and some thumb
instructions are not generated correctly, e.g., the addresses for tBL/tBLX are
not calculated right.
With that attached patch, we can compile and run some
2011 May 17
0
[LLVMdev] [Patch] Let MC/ELF generate Thumb/Thumb-2 are properly
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 12:29 AM, Rafael Avila de Espindola
<rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 11-05-16 09:21 AM, Koan-Sin Tan wrote:
>>
>> splited patches and test cases
>>
>> mc-elf-thumbfunction-bit.diff: for 1
>> mc-elf-arm-backend-bl-blx-sign-bit.diff: for 2.
>> mc-elf-thumb-bl-blx-relocation-table-entry.diff: for 3.
>> mc-elf-cpu-xscale-attributes.diff: for 4.
>>
>> elf-thumbfunc.s: test case for 1
>> elf-thumbfunc-reloc.ll: test case for 2 and 3
&...