search for: througout

...methods exist, and that the return an array etc OR Check that the model has the named has_many association through it''s reflections. On one hand the second one looks like it will be a bit more robust, since if there is a has_many relationship, then all the associated methods may be used througout the app. This would put testing in the one place. On the other hand, this would be really testing the implementation of the model rather than it''s behaviour. The behaviour is to call @ article.comments and have an array of comments returned. Any thoughts? Cheers Daniel --------------...

Right now you can use either Pens/Balance/Pound to put in front of some Mongrels and it works really good (easy to setup too!). I got to thinking, would it be possible to mimic what Pens/Balance/Pound does in pure Ruby (yeah, I know the answer is yes)? I guess I''m looking for a starting point. Does one simply write an HTTP listener that then redirects the calls to Mongrel? Is

Hi, I'm not clear with the aliasing rules for the pointer pointing to const memory. It will be great help if someone clarify my doubts. Consider below test program: int foo(int *A, int *B, const int *C, int len) { for (int i = 0; i < len; i++) A[i] = B[i] + *C; } In this test case the type for "C" is const int * type, it means the pointer is pointing to a memory which is

...of calling functions includes the specification of # its namespace? In principle, the functionality offered by 'namespace::fun()' # gets the job done. # BUT: # a) it is slower compared to the direct way of calling a function. # (see illustration below). # b) this option is not available througout the development process of a package # as there is no namespace yet and there's no way to emulate one. This in # turn means that even though a package developer would buy into strictly # using 'mypkg::fun()' throughout his package code, he can only do so at the # very fi...