search for: throughputs

Hi everybody, I have several VMs running on Xenserver 6.5 I have 2 samba servers (1 DC & 1 Fileserver). They are both running Debian Linux 8.2 Jessie. I'm using the samba debian package (4.1.17) My VM has 8G RAM and 4 vCPU How can i test if the performances are quite good or not? with reading/writing Could I have better performance with the latest samba release? thanks Pierre --

Hello? We have used glusterfs3.4 with the lasted samba-glusterfs-vfs lib to test samba performance in windows client. two glusterfs server nodes export share with name of "gvol": hardwares: brick use a raid 5 logic disk with 8 * 2T SATA HDDs 10G network connection one linux client mount the "gvol" with cmd: [root at localhost current]# mount.cifs //192.168.100.133/gvol

Hi Andrea, So does this definition make sense for basic blocks with more than one instructions? E.g. how should one interpret a basic block with RThroughput of 2.3? On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 7:39 AM Andrea Di Biagio <andrea.dibiagio at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Tom, > > Field 'Total Cycles' from the summary view simply reports the elapsed > number of cycles for the entire

I went to the site to subscribe again and ended up watching some of Jeremy's Google interviews. I particularly enjoyed the interview with James and the bow tie lesson at the end. :) So anyway, I recently upgraded my home network to end-to-end GbE. My clients are Windows XP SP3 w/hot fixes, and my Samba server is 3.5.6 atop vanilla kernel.org Linux 3.2.6 and Debian 6.0.6. With FDX fast

Hello, I have tried reading the documentation and googling for the answer but reviewing the online matches I end up more confused than before. My problem is apparently simple. I fit a glm model (2^k experiment), and then I would like to predict the response variable (Throughput) for unseen factor levels. When I try to predict I get the following error: > throughput.pred <-

Hi all, I used netperf to measure throughput between dom0 & domU. The throughput between dom0 -> domU was 256.00 Mb/sec domU -> dom0 was 401.15 Mb/sec. The throughput between dom0 & domU seems to be very asymmetry. To my surprise the throughput between domU -> dom0 is more. The value which I specified are consistent values. Is

Hello, I have one replication (r=1 of the 2^k*r) of a 2^k experimental design in the context of performance analysis i.e. my response variables are Throughput and Response Time. I use the "aov" function and the results look ok: > str(throughput) 'data.frame': 286 obs. of 7 variables: $ Time : int 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ... $ Throughput : int 42 44 33 41

Hello, When I try to use TukeyHSD in the following way it shows the confidence interval corresponding to the last factor only. > throughput.aov <- aov(Throughput~No_databases+Partitioning+No_middlewares+Queue_size,data=throughput) plot(TukeyHSD(throughput.aov)) # I expected here to see the confidence intervals for all factors but see only the last. OTOH this one works but then it is

I hope I'm in the right place for this question. I am in the process of creating a large scale production fileserver architecture for the purpose of serving very large files (~4.5GB) to a small number of clients (~200). My assumptions to this point have been that my throughput would be constrained by hardware and not software, but I would like some validation of this thinking. I am hoping

Hi, I am encountering a weird issue, where domU RX throughput (of traffic from another machine) is very low. But domU RX throughput from dom0 is fine, and dom0 RX from another machine is fine. iperf reported the following throughputs: dom0 <- outside -- 942Mbps domU <- dom0 -- 3467Mbps domU <- outside -- 87Mbps The NIC on the machine is 1GE. What puzzles me is, some instances of domU (with same config) is able to achieve almost 1Gbps RX throughput. And this seem to be very random. I am running Debian stable (Squeez...

Dear I am very new to tinc and would like to ask any advice regarding tinc's throughput. I have been using OpenVPN for several years and found tinc as a simpler/scaler VPN using TUN/TAP device. I have tried to use tinc on WindowsXP and measured throughput in contrast to OpenVPN. My test revealed that tinc is faster in PING response (almost half of OpenVPN). However, when I tested with

First, I apologize if this message has been received multiple times. I''m having problems subscribing to this mailing list: Hi xen-users, I am trying to decide whether I should run a game server inside a Xen domain. My primary reason for wanting to virtualize is because I want to isolate this environment from the rest of my server. I really like the idea of isolating the game server

I have a backup spooling onto a DLT drive. Is there any tool that will let me monitor the data throughput on the device? -- Bowie

Hi All, I have gone through threads related to throughput issue in this list. Found few similar issue, but could not get the solution. So looking for some advice from group. I am trying to use the samba to access a USB disk connected to our evaluation board which has xtensa core running at 400 MHz. Samba 3.5.x is running on the board. We are getting below throughput as tested with the

Hi all, I used netperf to measure throughput between dom0 & domU. The throughput between dom0 -> domU was 256.00 Mb/sec domU -> dom0 was 401.15 Mb/sec. 1) Dom0 -> DomU: Recv Socket Size bytes Send Socket Size bytes Send Message Size bytes Elapsed Time Secs. Throughput Mbs/sec 87380 16384 16384 10.01 231.61

Hi all, I used netperf to measure throughput between dom0 & domU. The throughput between dom0 -> domU was 256.00 Mb/sec domU -> dom0 was 401.15 Mb/sec. 1) Dom0 -> DomU: Recv Socket Size bytes Send Socket Size bytes Send Message Size bytes Elapsed Time Secs. Throughput Mbs/sec 87380 16384 16384 10.01 231.61

Hi, I am trying to optimize my gigabit network. I have two Intel 1000 MT Gigabit Server Adapters, which support Jumbo Frames -- as well as a Switch that supports Jumbo Frames. However, I am observing some strange behavior in my file transfers from Windows XP to Linux and I am wondering if it has anything to do with the way the Samba variables are set on my Linux box? The "strange

Hello all, I really appreciate how helpful the people in this list are. Would it be too much to ask to send a small script to have it peer-reviewed? to make sure I am not making blatant mistakes? The script takes an experiment.dat as input and generates system Throughput using ggplot2. It works now ... [sigh] but I have this nasty feeling that I might be doing something wrong :). Changing

I'm trying to do an fsck on an ext3 partition but I'm seeing abysmally slow disk throughput; monitoring with "dstat" (like vmstat) shows ~1200-1500KB/s throughput to the disks. Even with 24hrs of fsck-ing I only get ~3% (still in pass1). The filesystem is ext3 running "e2fsck -C0 /dev/sda3" and about 3.7TB on an x86_64-based system with 4GB RAM. e2fsprogs is 1.41.9.

Hi there, we're using tinc to mesh together hosts in a public datacenter (instead of using a private VLAN, sort of). So all hosts are reasonably modern; connections are low latency with an available bandwith of around 500Mbit/s or 1Gbit/s (depending on how close they are to each other). Iperf between two nodes directly reports around 940Mbit/s. The CPUs are Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4770 CPU @