search for: threaed

Displaying 19 results from an estimated 19 matches for "threaed".

Did you mean: thread
2010 Oct 20
1
threaed ordered subject algorithm
We have custom plugins for squirrelmail which use thread orderedsubject, but according to capabilities dovecot only support thread by references algorithm. At present, we are using Courier with this capabilities (two algorithms are implemented). Could we use orderedsubject in dovecot?
2005 Feb 19
1
Samba with ADS
Hello All, I am a newbie.. I want to compile Samba with ADS support for Solaris UltraSparcIII I have downloaded the source for 1> Samba 3.0.10 2> MIT Kerberos 5 1.4 3> OpenSSL 0.9.7e 4> OpenLDAP I started by trying to make MIT Kerberos. CC=gcc CPPFLAGS='-D__EXTENSIONS__' CFLAGS='-m64' ./configure configured it but when I try make I get ..
2013 Apr 29
1
Java client error on Windows 7 64 bit for Libvirt on KVM
Hi, I need some help in building a Java client on Windows 7 64 bit plaftorm to manage a KVM using the libvirt APIs. Using the instructions at http://libvirt.org/java.html, i was able to build libvirt.jar. My understanding is that libvirt.jar uses JNA to call libvirt's native windows library. I tried using the libvirt dlls in the experimental Windows installation package mentioned in
2006 Sep 20
0
Help problem compiling dovecot-1.0.rc7 on Solaris 10x86
Hi, I hope someone can help point me in the right direction. I have a Sunfire x4100 running Solaris 10x86 06/06 with the Sun Studio 11 compiler. I am just trying to do a stock compile of dovecot-1.0.rc7 Ran the ./configure fine. See Below. Install prefix ...................... : /usr/local File offsets ........................ : 64bit I/O loop method ..................... : poll File change
2007 Apr 18
0
[RFC/PATCH PV_OPS X86_64 07/17] paravirt_ops - descriptor changes.
plain text document attachment (xx-paravirt-desc-header.patch) Update the descriptors for an interface with paravirt ops Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt srostedt@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@redhat.com> Index: clean-start/include/asm-x86_64/desc.h =================================================================== ---
2007 Apr 18
0
[RFC/PATCH PV_OPS X86_64 07/17] paravirt_ops - descriptor changes.
plain text document attachment (xx-paravirt-desc-header.patch) Update the descriptors for an interface with paravirt ops Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt srostedt@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@redhat.com> Index: clean-start/include/asm-x86_64/desc.h =================================================================== ---
2011 Oct 03
0
[LLVMdev] ld crashes with invalid pointer on Ubuntu 11.04 x86 when linking libgcc_s.so
I downloaded the source package for Ubuntu 11.04's ld - it's part of binutils. It's building right now with "-g" on the compile command line, and with --prefix set to install in a subdir of my ~/LLVM directory. I've already tried enabling core dumps: $ ulimit -c unlimited ... but with the release ld that's included with Ubuntu I don't get symbols. Building
2009 Aug 17
1
Problem with setter override on ActiveRecord
(This message was originally written on StackOverflow -- the formatting is much prettier there -- http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1283046/problem-with-setter-override-on-activerecord) This is not exactly a question, it''s rather a report on how I solved an issue with write_attribute when the attribute is an object, on Rails'' Active Record. I hope this can be useful to others
2010 Mar 22
7
How to reference a select_tag within a form
Hi All, Inside my app\views\expenses\new.html.erb file, I had the code: <% form_for(@expense) do |f| %> [snip] <p> <%= f.label :vendor %><br /> <%= f.text_field :vendor %> <br /> <div id="vendor_droplist> <%= select_tag "test", options_for_select(@current_vendors.collect { |v| v.nickname }), {:multiple
2007 Apr 18
2
[PATCH] Fix CONFIG_PARAVIRT for 2.6.19-rc5-mm1
OK, at least two patches got dropped on the way from the mm tree to Andi's tree: the desc.h cleanup, and the processor.h rearrangement. Merging into Andi's tree without these patches must have been a nightmare 8( Andi then tried to fix it with x86_64-mm-paravirt-compile.patch but then it didn't boot so he disabled it in x86_64-mm-paravirt-broken.patch This patch undoes those two
2007 Apr 18
2
[PATCH] Fix CONFIG_PARAVIRT for 2.6.19-rc5-mm1
OK, at least two patches got dropped on the way from the mm tree to Andi's tree: the desc.h cleanup, and the processor.h rearrangement. Merging into Andi's tree without these patches must have been a nightmare 8( Andi then tried to fix it with x86_64-mm-paravirt-compile.patch but then it didn't boot so he disabled it in x86_64-mm-paravirt-broken.patch This patch undoes those two
2011 Oct 03
4
[LLVMdev] ld crashes with invalid pointer on Ubuntu 11.04 x86 when linking libgcc_s.so
This shouldn't be considered our bug (should it?). I'm going to report it to Ubuntu. I will restart my build, but does anyone else see this on Ubuntu 11.04? Note that I have a 32-bit machine with 2 GB of RAM and no swap. $ ld --version GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Ubuntu) 2.21.0.20110327 Copyright 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc. $ uname -a Linux frylock 2.6.38-11-generic #50-Ubuntu
2007 Dec 06
51
[PATCH 0/19] desc_struct integration
Hi, this is a series of patches that unify the struct desc_struct and friends across x86_64 and i386. As usual, it provides paravirt capabilities as a side-effect for x86_64. I consider the main goal, namely, of unifying the desc_struct, an ongoing effort, being this the beginning. A lot of old code has to be touched to accomplish that. I don't consider this patch ready for inclusion.
2007 Dec 06
51
[PATCH 0/19] desc_struct integration
Hi, this is a series of patches that unify the struct desc_struct and friends across x86_64 and i386. As usual, it provides paravirt capabilities as a side-effect for x86_64. I consider the main goal, namely, of unifying the desc_struct, an ongoing effort, being this the beginning. A lot of old code has to be touched to accomplish that. I don't consider this patch ready for inclusion.
2007 Apr 18
2
[PATCH] x86_64 paravirt_ops port
Hi all, I've been working on a port of paravirt_ops for the x86_64 architectures for a couple of days. Here's the result so far. I'm posting it soon for early cooments. The more, the better. It's obviously based on the previous work for i386, with the needed modifications. By now, I'm able to boot a bare metal kernel, but there are still some known issues, that are in my TODO
2007 Apr 18
2
[PATCH] x86_64 paravirt_ops port
Hi all, I've been working on a port of paravirt_ops for the x86_64 architectures for a couple of days. Here's the result so far. I'm posting it soon for early cooments. The more, the better. It's obviously based on the previous work for i386, with the needed modifications. By now, I'm able to boot a bare metal kernel, but there are still some known issues, that are in my TODO
2007 Oct 15
13
[PATCH 00/12] xen/paravirt_ops patches for 2.6.24
Hi Linus, Here's a set of patches to update paravirt_ops and Xen for 2.6.24 A quick overview of the patchset: paravirt_ops: Remove the monolithic paravirt_ops structure, and replace it with smaller structures of related functions. Also, clean up the handling of lazy mode to make it easier to implement. x86/mm/init.c: remove a chunk of dead code Xen: - remove duplicate includes -
2007 Oct 15
13
[PATCH 00/12] xen/paravirt_ops patches for 2.6.24
Hi Linus, Here's a set of patches to update paravirt_ops and Xen for 2.6.24 A quick overview of the patchset: paravirt_ops: Remove the monolithic paravirt_ops structure, and replace it with smaller structures of related functions. Also, clean up the handling of lazy mode to make it easier to implement. x86/mm/init.c: remove a chunk of dead code Xen: - remove duplicate includes -
2007 Oct 15
13
[PATCH 00/12] xen/paravirt_ops patches for 2.6.24
Hi Linus, Here's a set of patches to update paravirt_ops and Xen for 2.6.24 A quick overview of the patchset: paravirt_ops: Remove the monolithic paravirt_ops structure, and replace it with smaller structures of related functions. Also, clean up the handling of lazy mode to make it easier to implement. x86/mm/init.c: remove a chunk of dead code Xen: - remove duplicate includes -