Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "threadedge".
Did you mean:
threaded
2011 Aug 02
0
[LLVMdev] Multiple successors, single dynamic successor
...ading will do it for you.
I'm not familiar with a way to express exactly what you want to say,
but are you opposed to just duplicating the block? That is, you could
duplicate the block, and have the ith predecessor go to the duplicate
which goes to the ith successor. You can use JumpThreading::ThreadEdge
in lib/Transforms/Scalar/JumpThreading.cpp as a guide.
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 10:22 AM, Carlo Alberto Ferraris
<cafxx at strayorange.com> wrote:
> Suppose I have a bb with N predecessors and N successors. What is, in your
> opinion, the best way to express that the bb has (dynamically)...
2011 Aug 02
2
[LLVMdev] Multiple successors, single dynamic successor
Suppose I have a bb with N predecessors and N successors. What is, in
your opinion, the best way to express that the bb has (dynamically) only
one successor (i.e. if coming from the i-th predecessor we will always
jump to the i-th successor)?
b.r.,
--
Carlo Alberto Ferraris <cafxx at strayorange.com
<mailto:cafxx at strayorange.com>>
website/blog