Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "thin_pools".
Did you mean:
thin_pool
2015 Jun 26
1
LVM hatred, was Re: /boot on a separate partition?
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Gordon Messmer
<gordon.messmer at gmail.com> wrote:
>> , or alternatively making the LVs
>> redundant after install is a single command (each) and you can choose
>> whether it should be mere mirroring or some MD manged RAID level (modulo
>> the LVM RAID MD monitoring issue).
>
>
> I hadn't realized that. That's an
2017 Sep 05
0
returning from a failed RAID
...ost 3 drives in a RAID6 array and
the structure of all of the LVM pools and nodes was lost.
This array was 1/2 of a redundant (replica 2) gluster config (will be
adding additional 3rd soon for split brain/redundancy with failure
issues).
The failed drives were replaced, the array rebuilt, all the thin_pools
and thin_volumes recreated, LUKS recreated and now the data from the
other half has been bulk copied to the rebuilt mirror locations.
It's time to bring gluster back online. The original gluster data was
not part of the raid failure and all the names are the same (except one
LV, thin_lv, and i...
2017 Sep 05
0
recover from failed RAID
...00TB of storage was scrambled.
This array was 1/2 of a redundant (replica 2) gluster config (will be
adding additional 3rd soon for split brain/redundancy with failure
issues) so the data was not lost but just running in a degraded mode.
The failed drives were replaced, the array rebuilt, all the thin_pools
and thin_volumes recreated, LUKS recreated and now the data from the
other half has been bulk copied to the rebuilt mirror locations - along
with all the .glusterfs space - not sure if that should be copied over
or not.
It's time to bring gluster back online. The original gluster data was
not...