search for: there've

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 29 matches for "there've".

Did you mean: there're
2017 Feb 13
8
CentOS 7, systemd, NetworkMangler, oh, my
My manager tells me a system in the datacenter is down. I go down there, and plug in a monitor-on-a-stick and keyboard. It's up, but no network. I try systemctl restart NetworkManager several times, and ip a shows *no* change. Finally, I do an ifdown, followed by an ifup, and everything's wonderful. My manager thinks that the NM daemon thinks everything's...
2018 Feb 23
2
deprecated options in sshd_config
Le 23/02/2018 ? 12:42, Colin Watson a ?crit?: > On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 11:46:31AM +0100, mlrx wrote: >> I jumped from an OS to an other since few days. On the new one, >> openssh comes in a much newer version (good thing): 7.6p1 >> sshd lets me know that there are two depreciated options: >> - KeyRegenerationInterval >> - UsePrivilegeSeparation >> >> I search for a place where I can find information about deprecated >> options and how to manage it. > > I can't give you a general answer other than reading git histo...
2018 Sep 21
2
X32 bugs around "cannot select" lingering around
Hi, There's several, to my eyes, somewhat related looking bugs: Bug 36743 - Cannot select: X86ISD::CALL ICE with -mx32 -O2 -fno-plt https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36743 Bug 34268 - JITting of x32 code on x64 fails with crash or instruction selection error. https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3...
2015 Jul 10
2
Getent Differences on a DC and a Member Server
Hi, I know there've been some workarounds on this topic, however I'm missing the reason for winbind to behave differently on a DC and on a member server (I also had to work around that problem and I'd really like it fixed). If there's a technical reason for it, it'd be nice to know about it. If...
2004 Jan 04
4
Sun Servers with UltraSparc Processors
Hi, I'm just considering buying two Telecoms grade Sun Netra's to run a lab-based VoIP solution. Not my immediate thoughts as a VoIP platform, but from what I've heard, they can run Linux, and run it well. Only thing is: The Wiki and the Whitepaper just state that Asterisk is for the x86 architecture, but has been compiled to run on PPC architectures. No mention of UltraSparc.
2012 Dec 01
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Change tests to run with fixed (not-host dependent) triple
...ts (eg test/codegen) explicitly opt into march=native? >> > > I'd really like the default behavior to be something that forces the test > to either be independent of the targeted triple, or explicitly set a > target. I like the default being unknown. > To state the obvious, there's two different things that go on in tests: the specific thing being tested and things that aren't being tested but just need to be done to provide enough "context" for what's being tested. I was involved in a long slog trying to fix up a lot of the ARM regression test failues...
2015 Feb 04
0
multipathd
On 2/4/2015 6:02 AM, Rushton Martin wrote: > OS is CentOS 5.3 (yes, I know - upgrade) at least patch CentOS 5. 5.3 is a snapshot from 6 years ago (2009), there've been 6 years of updates to CentOS 5 since that point, both security and bug fixes. `yum update` would bring you up to CentOS the .11 update plus security/bug fixes since. -- john r pierce 37N 122W somewhere on the middle of the left coast
2015 Feb 05
0
UC multipathd
...f John R Pierce >Sent: 04 February 2015 19:01 >To: centos at centos.org >Subject: Re: [CentOS] multipathd > >On 2/4/2015 6:02 AM, Rushton Martin wrote: >> OS is CentOS 5.3 (yes, I know - upgrade) > >at least patch CentOS 5. 5.3 is a snapshot from 6 years ago (2009), >there've been 6 years of updates to CentOS 5 since that point, both >security and bug fixes. `yum update` would bring you up to CentOS the >.11 update plus security/bug fixes since. > > > >-- >john r pierce 37N 122W >somewhere on the midd...
2015 Feb 05
0
UC multipathd
...f John R Pierce >Sent: 04 February 2015 19:01 >To: centos at centos.org >Subject: Re: [CentOS] multipathd > >On 2/4/2015 6:02 AM, Rushton Martin wrote: >> OS is CentOS 5.3 (yes, I know - upgrade) > >at least patch CentOS 5. 5.3 is a snapshot from 6 years ago (2009), >there've been 6 years of updates to CentOS 5 since that point, both >security and bug fixes. `yum update` would bring you up to CentOS the >.11 update plus security/bug fixes since. > > > >-- >john r pierce 37N 122W >somewhere on the midd...
2017 Feb 13
0
CentOS 7, systemd, NetworkMangler, oh, my
On 13/02/17 15:35, m.roth wrote: > My manager tells me a system in the datacenter is down. I go down there, > and plug in a monitor-on-a-stick and keyboard. It's up, but no network. I > try systemctl restart NetworkManager several times, and ip a shows *no* > change. > > Finally, I do an ifdown, followed by an ifup, and everything's wonderful. > > My manager thinks that the...
2017 Feb 13
0
CentOS 7, systemd, NetworkMangler, oh, my
...5 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > Finally, I do an ifdown, followed by an ifup, and everything's wonderful. What's in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-<interface>? Does it say NM_CONTROLLED=no? > My manager thinks that the NM daemon thinks everything's fine, and > there've been no changes, so it does nothing. He suggests that it might > have to be stopped, then started, rather than restarted. "systemctl restart NetworkManager" completely stops the service and starts it again. > This is completely unacceptable behavior, since it leave the sys...
2017 Feb 13
0
CentOS 7, systemd, NetworkMangler, oh, my
On 13 February 2017 at 15:35, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: > My manager tells me a system in the datacenter is down. I go down there, > and plug in a monitor-on-a-stick and keyboard. It's up, but no network. I > try systemctl restart NetworkManager several times, and ip a shows *no* > change. > > Finally, I do an ifdown, followed by an ifup, and everything's wonderful. > > My manager thinks that the...
2015 Jul 10
0
Getent Differences on a DC and a Member Server
On 10/07/15 08:05, Ritter, Marcel (RRZE) wrote: > Hi, > > I know there've been some workarounds on this topic, however I'm missing > the reason for winbind to behave differently on a DC and on a member > server (I also had to work around that problem and I'd really like it fixed). The reason is a bit historical, originally samba4, when running as an...
2015 Feb 05
0
UC multipathd
...f John R Pierce >Sent: 04 February 2015 19:01 >To: centos at centos.org >Subject: Re: [CentOS] multipathd > >On 2/4/2015 6:02 AM, Rushton Martin wrote: >> OS is CentOS 5.3 (yes, I know - upgrade) > >at least patch CentOS 5. 5.3 is a snapshot from 6 years ago (2009), >there've been 6 years of updates to CentOS 5 since that point, both >security and bug fixes. `yum update` would bring you up to CentOS the >.11 update plus security/bug fixes since. > > > >-- >john r pierce 37N 122W >somewhere on the midd...
2015 Feb 05
0
UC multipathd
...f John R Pierce >Sent: 04 February 2015 19:01 >To: centos at centos.org >Subject: Re: [CentOS] multipathd > >On 2/4/2015 6:02 AM, Rushton Martin wrote: >> OS is CentOS 5.3 (yes, I know - upgrade) > >at least patch CentOS 5. 5.3 is a snapshot from 6 years ago (2009), >there've been 6 years of updates to CentOS 5 since that point, both >security and bug fixes. `yum update` would bring you up to CentOS the >.11 update plus security/bug fixes since. > > > >-- >john r pierce 37N 122W >somewhere on the midd...
2015 Feb 05
0
UC multipathd
...f John R Pierce >Sent: 04 February 2015 19:01 >To: centos at centos.org >Subject: Re: [CentOS] multipathd > >On 2/4/2015 6:02 AM, Rushton Martin wrote: >> OS is CentOS 5.3 (yes, I know - upgrade) > >at least patch CentOS 5. 5.3 is a snapshot from 6 years ago (2009), >there've been 6 years of updates to CentOS 5 since that point, both >security and bug fixes. `yum update` would bring you up to CentOS the >.11 update plus security/bug fixes since. > > > >-- >john r pierce 37N 122W >somewhere on the midd...
2015 Feb 05
0
UC multipathd
...f John R Pierce >Sent: 04 February 2015 19:01 >To: centos at centos.org >Subject: Re: [CentOS] multipathd > >On 2/4/2015 6:02 AM, Rushton Martin wrote: >> OS is CentOS 5.3 (yes, I know - upgrade) > >at least patch CentOS 5. 5.3 is a snapshot from 6 years ago (2009), >there've been 6 years of updates to CentOS 5 since that point, both >security and bug fixes. `yum update` would bring you up to CentOS the >.11 update plus security/bug fixes since. > > > >-- >john r pierce 37N 122W >somewhere on the midd...
2011 Jul 31
1
3.5.x on AIX 5.2
I've been successfully building all the 3.4.x releases on AIX 5.2 with the configure command line of: # CC="gcc -g -D LINUX_SOURCE_COMPAT" ./configure However, 3.5.x fails to build with the same configure args, reporting: Linking non-shared library bin/libaddns.a Linking non-shared library bin/libsmbclient.a make: Cannot find a rule to create target EXTRA_FLAGS from dependencies.
2005 Apr 25
3
RedHat EL 3 rpm spec file and samba 3.0.14a?
Is the RedHat RPM spec file included with the samba-3.0.14a.tar.gz source files compatible with RedHat EL 3? In other words, are the locations for the various support directories (/var/lib/samba, /var/cache/samba, etc.) the same between the RedHat EL 3 version of samba (currently stuck at 3.0.9, I think) and the official samba.org <http://samba.org> versions? I would like to upgrade my
2007 Apr 13
8
Many Fedora 6 packages in CentOS 5
Why are there so many Fedora 6 packages in CentOS 5? Are there something wrong with the build system? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 5766 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature URL: <http://lists.cento...