Displaying 20 results from an estimated 29 matches for "there've".
Did you mean:
there're
2017 Feb 13
8
CentOS 7, systemd, NetworkMangler, oh, my
My manager tells me a system in the datacenter is down. I go down there,
and plug in a monitor-on-a-stick and keyboard. It's up, but no network. I
try systemctl restart NetworkManager several times, and ip a shows *no*
change.
Finally, I do an ifdown, followed by an ifup, and everything's wonderful.
My manager thinks that the NM daemon thinks everything's...
2018 Feb 23
2
deprecated options in sshd_config
Le 23/02/2018 ? 12:42, Colin Watson a ?crit?:
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 11:46:31AM +0100, mlrx wrote:
>> I jumped from an OS to an other since few days. On the new one,
>> openssh comes in a much newer version (good thing): 7.6p1
>> sshd lets me know that there are two depreciated options:
>> - KeyRegenerationInterval
>> - UsePrivilegeSeparation
>>
>> I search for a place where I can find information about deprecated
>> options and how to manage it.
>
> I can't give you a general answer other than reading git histo...
2018 Sep 21
2
X32 bugs around "cannot select" lingering around
Hi,
There's several, to my eyes, somewhat related looking bugs:
Bug 36743 - Cannot select: X86ISD::CALL ICE with -mx32 -O2 -fno-plt
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36743
Bug 34268 - JITting of x32 code on x64 fails with crash or instruction selection error.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3...
2015 Jul 10
2
Getent Differences on a DC and a Member Server
Hi,
I know there've been some workarounds on this topic, however I'm missing
the reason for winbind to behave differently on a DC and on a member
server (I also had to work around that problem and I'd really like it fixed).
If there's a technical reason for it, it'd be nice to know about it.
If...
2004 Jan 04
4
Sun Servers with UltraSparc Processors
Hi,
I'm just considering buying two Telecoms grade Sun Netra's to run a
lab-based VoIP solution. Not my immediate thoughts as a VoIP platform,
but from what I've heard, they can run Linux, and run it well.
Only thing is:
The Wiki and the Whitepaper just state that Asterisk is for the x86
architecture, but has been compiled to run on PPC architectures. No
mention of UltraSparc.
2012 Dec 01
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Change tests to run with fixed (not-host dependent) triple
...ts (eg test/codegen) explicitly opt into march=native?
>>
>
> I'd really like the default behavior to be something that forces the test
> to either be independent of the targeted triple, or explicitly set a
> target. I like the default being unknown.
>
To state the obvious, there's two different things that go on in tests: the
specific thing being tested and things that aren't being tested but just
need to be done to provide enough "context" for what's being tested. I was
involved in a long slog trying to fix up a lot of the ARM regression test
failues...
2015 Feb 04
0
multipathd
On 2/4/2015 6:02 AM, Rushton Martin wrote:
> OS is CentOS 5.3 (yes, I know - upgrade)
at least patch CentOS 5. 5.3 is a snapshot from 6 years ago (2009),
there've been 6 years of updates to CentOS 5 since that point, both
security and bug fixes. `yum update` would bring you up to CentOS the
.11 update plus security/bug fixes since.
--
john r pierce 37N 122W
somewhere on the middle of the left coast
2015 Feb 05
0
UC multipathd
...f John R Pierce
>Sent: 04 February 2015 19:01
>To: centos at centos.org
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] multipathd
>
>On 2/4/2015 6:02 AM, Rushton Martin wrote:
>> OS is CentOS 5.3 (yes, I know - upgrade)
>
>at least patch CentOS 5. 5.3 is a snapshot from 6 years ago (2009),
>there've been 6 years of updates to CentOS 5 since that point, both
>security and bug fixes. `yum update` would bring you up to CentOS the
>.11 update plus security/bug fixes since.
>
>
>
>--
>john r pierce 37N 122W
>somewhere on the midd...
2015 Feb 05
0
UC multipathd
...f John R Pierce
>Sent: 04 February 2015 19:01
>To: centos at centos.org
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] multipathd
>
>On 2/4/2015 6:02 AM, Rushton Martin wrote:
>> OS is CentOS 5.3 (yes, I know - upgrade)
>
>at least patch CentOS 5. 5.3 is a snapshot from 6 years ago (2009),
>there've been 6 years of updates to CentOS 5 since that point, both
>security and bug fixes. `yum update` would bring you up to CentOS the
>.11 update plus security/bug fixes since.
>
>
>
>--
>john r pierce 37N 122W
>somewhere on the midd...
2017 Feb 13
0
CentOS 7, systemd, NetworkMangler, oh, my
On 13/02/17 15:35, m.roth wrote:
> My manager tells me a system in the datacenter is down. I go down there,
> and plug in a monitor-on-a-stick and keyboard. It's up, but no network. I
> try systemctl restart NetworkManager several times, and ip a shows *no*
> change.
>
> Finally, I do an ifdown, followed by an ifup, and everything's wonderful.
>
> My manager thinks that the...
2017 Feb 13
0
CentOS 7, systemd, NetworkMangler, oh, my
...5 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote:
> Finally, I do an ifdown, followed by an ifup, and everything's wonderful.
What's in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-<interface>? Does it say
NM_CONTROLLED=no?
> My manager thinks that the NM daemon thinks everything's fine, and
> there've been no changes, so it does nothing. He suggests that it might
> have to be stopped, then started, rather than restarted.
"systemctl restart NetworkManager" completely stops the service and
starts it again.
> This is completely unacceptable behavior, since it leave the sys...
2017 Feb 13
0
CentOS 7, systemd, NetworkMangler, oh, my
On 13 February 2017 at 15:35, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote:
> My manager tells me a system in the datacenter is down. I go down there,
> and plug in a monitor-on-a-stick and keyboard. It's up, but no network. I
> try systemctl restart NetworkManager several times, and ip a shows *no*
> change.
>
> Finally, I do an ifdown, followed by an ifup, and everything's wonderful.
>
> My manager thinks that the...
2015 Jul 10
0
Getent Differences on a DC and a Member Server
On 10/07/15 08:05, Ritter, Marcel (RRZE) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I know there've been some workarounds on this topic, however I'm missing
> the reason for winbind to behave differently on a DC and on a member
> server (I also had to work around that problem and I'd really like it fixed).
The reason is a bit historical, originally samba4, when running as an...
2015 Feb 05
0
UC multipathd
...f John R Pierce
>Sent: 04 February 2015 19:01
>To: centos at centos.org
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] multipathd
>
>On 2/4/2015 6:02 AM, Rushton Martin wrote:
>> OS is CentOS 5.3 (yes, I know - upgrade)
>
>at least patch CentOS 5. 5.3 is a snapshot from 6 years ago (2009),
>there've been 6 years of updates to CentOS 5 since that point, both
>security and bug fixes. `yum update` would bring you up to CentOS the
>.11 update plus security/bug fixes since.
>
>
>
>--
>john r pierce 37N 122W
>somewhere on the midd...
2015 Feb 05
0
UC multipathd
...f John R Pierce
>Sent: 04 February 2015 19:01
>To: centos at centos.org
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] multipathd
>
>On 2/4/2015 6:02 AM, Rushton Martin wrote:
>> OS is CentOS 5.3 (yes, I know - upgrade)
>
>at least patch CentOS 5. 5.3 is a snapshot from 6 years ago (2009),
>there've been 6 years of updates to CentOS 5 since that point, both
>security and bug fixes. `yum update` would bring you up to CentOS the
>.11 update plus security/bug fixes since.
>
>
>
>--
>john r pierce 37N 122W
>somewhere on the midd...
2015 Feb 05
0
UC multipathd
...f John R Pierce
>Sent: 04 February 2015 19:01
>To: centos at centos.org
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] multipathd
>
>On 2/4/2015 6:02 AM, Rushton Martin wrote:
>> OS is CentOS 5.3 (yes, I know - upgrade)
>
>at least patch CentOS 5. 5.3 is a snapshot from 6 years ago (2009),
>there've been 6 years of updates to CentOS 5 since that point, both
>security and bug fixes. `yum update` would bring you up to CentOS the
>.11 update plus security/bug fixes since.
>
>
>
>--
>john r pierce 37N 122W
>somewhere on the midd...
2015 Feb 05
0
UC multipathd
...f John R Pierce
>Sent: 04 February 2015 19:01
>To: centos at centos.org
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] multipathd
>
>On 2/4/2015 6:02 AM, Rushton Martin wrote:
>> OS is CentOS 5.3 (yes, I know - upgrade)
>
>at least patch CentOS 5. 5.3 is a snapshot from 6 years ago (2009),
>there've been 6 years of updates to CentOS 5 since that point, both
>security and bug fixes. `yum update` would bring you up to CentOS the
>.11 update plus security/bug fixes since.
>
>
>
>--
>john r pierce 37N 122W
>somewhere on the midd...
2011 Jul 31
1
3.5.x on AIX 5.2
I've been successfully building all the 3.4.x releases on AIX 5.2 with
the configure command line of:
# CC="gcc -g -D LINUX_SOURCE_COMPAT" ./configure
However, 3.5.x fails to build with the same configure args, reporting:
Linking non-shared library bin/libaddns.a
Linking non-shared library bin/libsmbclient.a
make: Cannot find a rule to create target EXTRA_FLAGS from dependencies.
2005 Apr 25
3
RedHat EL 3 rpm spec file and samba 3.0.14a?
Is the RedHat RPM spec file included with the samba-3.0.14a.tar.gz source
files compatible with RedHat EL 3? In other words, are the locations for the
various support directories (/var/lib/samba, /var/cache/samba, etc.) the
same between the RedHat EL 3 version of samba (currently stuck at 3.0.9, I
think) and the official samba.org <http://samba.org> versions?
I would like to upgrade my
2007 Apr 13
8
Many Fedora 6 packages in CentOS 5
Why are there so many Fedora 6 packages in CentOS 5?
Are there something wrong with the build system?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 5766 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.cento...