search for: thens

From: David Ahern <dsahern at gmail.com> Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2018 11:21:54 -0600 > It is a netdev so there is no reason to have a separate ip command to > inspect it. 'ip link' is the right place. I agree on this. What I really don't understand still is the use case... really. So there are control netdevs, what exactly is the problem with that? Are we not exporting enough

From: David Ahern <dsahern at gmail.com> Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2018 11:21:54 -0600 > It is a netdev so there is no reason to have a separate ip command to > inspect it. 'ip link' is the right place. I agree on this. What I really don't understand still is the use case... really. So there are control netdevs, what exactly is the problem with that? Are we not exporting enough

On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 10:37 AM, David Miller <davem at davemloft.net> wrote: > From: David Ahern <dsahern at gmail.com> > Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2018 11:21:54 -0600 > >> It is a netdev so there is no reason to have a separate ip command to >> inspect it. 'ip link' is the right place. > > I agree on this. I'm completely fine of having an API for

...archive members by cpu, builds "thin" archive libraries for each cpu, then concatenates the thin libraries together with a "fat header" which specifies the file offset and size of each thin archive. The linker, when it comes across a fat static library, looks at the fat header thens seeks along to the contained thin archive relevant to the cpu type being linked. This scheme works well, but it can produce large files because there is no attempt to reduce duplicates. -Nick > > The symbol table for each original archive can properly index to the relevant members in the...

I've been looking at the --progress reporting, which is somewhat improved these days. But look at this output of this evening rawhide mirror update: [...] perl-DB_File-1.75-27.i386.rpm 73430 100% 519.63kB/s 0:00:00 perl-DB_File-1.75-28.99.3.i386.rpm 61783 100% 533.94kB/s 0:00:00 [...] Now, while it's good to have the ETA ticking down as something is fetched,

The time has come to expand my OpenSolaris NAS. Right now I have 6 1TB Samsung Spinpoints in a Raidz2 configuration. I also have a mirrored root pool. The Raidz2 configuration should be for my most critical data - but right now it is holding everything so I need to add some more pools and move some data around. To start I need a vdev I will call "temp" that acts as a networked bit

What was the resolution to this issue? Was the patch accepted? I am also running into an issue with this. Basically, I have a fairly simple loop with control flow, and the loopSimplify pass is turning it into a nested loop in order to remove multiple backedges. This is making the loop more complicated, not simple, and is causing our backend to miss performance opportunities. In particular, I

AMD would like to add new functionality to ranlib (and later ar and nm) and to the bits of LLVM Core that read (and later write) archives. Herewith a terse summary of the change, which we want to improve support of OpenCL for multiple GPUs in a single run-time. Conceptually, a serialized archive is really 2 pieces: a few header members and a set of normal file members. There are no constraints on

I''m using puppet 0.25.1. I''ve got a simple resource: exec { "/bin/ls $oracle_base/dba/bin/database_backup.ksh": logoutput => on_failure, } and I don''t want it to log every time it''s successfully run: $ sudo tail -F /var/log/messages | grep puppetd Feb 17 16:36:11 test puppetd[26614]: (//my_module/Exec[/bin/ls /u01/

On 10/18/2012 01:26 PM, David Blaikie wrote: > On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Andrew Clinton<andrew at sidefx.com> wrote: >> I actually submitted a patch to fix this very problem quite a while back, >> but I don't think it was ever added to the baseline: >> >> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20110711/124136.html >> >>

I''m working on writing features for a wizard. The wizard collects information from a number of different forms, and you can navigate through it in a number of ways. Anyhow one of these forms is a customer form collecting name, and email. In the context of the wizard I feel that the following scenarios Scenario: Given I step to customer And I fill in my customer details

...archive members by cpu, builds "thin" archive libraries for each cpu, then concatenates the thin libraries together with a "fat header" which specifies the file offset and size of each thin archive. The linker, when it comes across a fat static library, looks at the fat header thens seeks along to the contained thin archive relevant to the cpu type being linked. This scheme works well, but it can produce large files because there is no attempt to reduce duplicates. Sounds pretty similar in terms of the problem… except we are motivated to avoid duplicates because a lot of the...

Hi all, I committed a first cut at blockless Givens/Whens/Thens to RSpec''s trunk: cd /path/to/rspec/project svn up cd rspec bin/spec examples/story/calculator.rb Take a look at examples/story/calculator.rb to see what''s going on. Needs docs!!!! Thoughts welcome. I''ve also got a cut at the plain text parser checked in, but it'...

I'm coming from a Debian system so my system accounts are below 1000, regular accounts start at 1000. For some historical reason somebody gave our main group id 500 so therefor I want my usable range to start at 500. Do I need both idmap config *:range and idmap config SAMDOM:range? I also tried with only 'idmap config *:range' but that didn't seem to help. I'll try again

hi, I just started fooling around with story runner, thought I''d start with a dead simple scenario: The first thing I do when describing a site to someone is go to the home page, and begin exploring public pages from there. So, that seems like a good first story to spec out. And I''d really like to extract the actual link from the rendered page (rather than just