Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "theincredibleholk".
2012 Dec 30
0
[LLVMdev] Extending GC infrastructure for roots in SSA values
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 2:17 AM, David Chisnall <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk
> wrote:
> On 30 Dec 2012, at 01:54, Talin wrote:
>
> > I completely agree with your point about wanting to be able to attach GC
> metadata to a type (rather than attaching it to a value, as is done now).
> In the past, there have been two objections to this approach: first, the
> overhead
2012 Dec 30
2
[LLVMdev] Extending GC infrastructure for roots in SSA values
On 30 Dec 2012, at 01:54, Talin wrote:
> I completely agree with your point about wanting to be able to attach GC metadata to a type (rather than attaching it to a value, as is done now). In the past, there have been two objections to this approach: first, the overhead that would be added to the Pointer type - the vast majority of LLVM users don't want to have to pay an extra 4-8 bytes per