Displaying 11 results from an estimated 11 matches for "that_s".
Did you mean:
that's
2020 Sep 07
2
[RFC] Introducing the maynotprogress IR attribute
On 9/7/20 4:48 PM, Nicolai Hähnle wrote:
> Hi Johannes,
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 11:17 PM Johannes Doerfert
> <johannesdoerfert at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > As a separate comment, I don't find the reference to the C++ spec in
>> >> > https://reviews.llvm.org/D86233 to be informative enough. Whenever
>> >> > that
2005 Mar 15
1
Samba and cups printing: lp_servicenumber: couldn't find hl5150d
Hello,
found no answer for the following elsewhere setting up samba on a Debian box:
The printer is seen on the net from the clients but no printing is possible.
$ smbclient -L pichuco
Domain=[TANGO] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.0.10-Debian]
Domain=[TANGO] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.0.10-Debian]
Anonymous login successful
Sharename Type Comment
--------- ---- -------
public
2018 Apr 10
0
Question about subset
Thanks.
That works great!
> df <- data.frame(x=c(1,1,NA,NA,2), y=c('a','a','a','b','b'), z=c(TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE))
> cond1 <- 'x==1'
> cond2 <- 'x==1 & z'
> df
x y z
1 1 a TRUE
2 1 a FALSE
3 NA a TRUE
4 NA b FALSE
5 2 b TRUE
> subset(df, subset = ifelse(is.na(eval(parse(text=cond1))), TRUE,
2024 Sep 15
1
Possible update to survival
I got good feedback from the list about a scope issue, so I am coming back for more.
Prior issue: users who type survival::coxph(survival::Surv(time, status) ~ x1 + x2 + surv ival::strata(group), data=mydata)
This messes up the character string matching for strata, done via tt <- terms(formula, specials= ?strata?). The code runs, and gives the wrong answer (group is treated as an ordinary
2020 Sep 07
2
[RFC] Introducing the maynotprogress IR attribute
On 9/7/20 10:56 AM, Nicolai Hähnle wrote:
> Hi Johannes and Atmn,
>
> On Sat, Sep 5, 2020 at 7:07 AM Johannes Doerfert via llvm-dev
> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>> > In any case, please explain the intended behavior of the
attribute and
>> > the metadata upon inlining.
>>
>> The attribute will be attached to the caller upon
2020 Sep 07
4
[RFC] Introducing the maynotprogress IR attribute
On 9/7/20 2:52 PM, Nicolai Hähnle wrote:
> Hi Johannes,
>
> On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 6:51 PM Johannes Doerfert
> <johannesdoerfert at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 9/7/20 10:56 AM, Nicolai Hähnle wrote:
>> > Hi Johannes and Atmn,
>> >
>> > On Sat, Sep 5, 2020 at 7:07 AM Johannes Doerfert via llvm-dev
>> > <llvm-dev at
2018 Nov 29
2
'git llvm push' not working for me on Windows
Excellent, thanks!
--paulr
From: James Y Knight [mailto:jyknight at google.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2018 12:00 PM
To: Robinson, Paul
Cc: Mikhail Ramalho; vedant_kumar at apple.com; llvm-dev
Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] 'git llvm push' not working for me on Windows
Aha! From your output I figured out what I screwed up. Sorry about the trouble...
Illustration of the issue:
svn
2019 Feb 01
2
'git llvm push' not working for me on Windows
The usual workaround is to do `rm –rf .git/llvm-upstream-svn` and try again.
You could also patch llvm/utils/git-svn/git-llvm to add the `--verbose` option to the `git apply` command, which would provide better diagnostic output.
HTH,
--paulr
From: Petr Hosek [mailto:phosek at chromium.org]
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2019 10:52 PM
To: Robinson, Paul
Cc: James Y Knight; llvm-dev; vedant_kumar at
2018 Nov 28
2
'git llvm push' not working for me on Windows
Poking around in the .git\llvm-upstream-svn tree, I find that llvm\trunk\test\DebugInfo\Generic is empty, as are all the other subdirectories of test\DebugInfo that I tried. I have other files in the checkin that are in leaf directories but those files all exist.
I hacked git-llvm to add a –verbose option:
`git apply --verbose -p2 -` returned 1
Checking patch
2020 Sep 05
4
[RFC] Introducing the maynotprogress IR attribute
On 9/4/20 7:39 PM, Hal Finkel via llvm-dev wrote:
>
> On 9/4/20 6:31 PM, Atmn Patel via llvm-dev wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> We’ve prepared a new function attribute `maynotprogress` and loop
>> metadata `llvm.loop.mustprogress` in order to better formalize the way
>> LLVM deals with infinite loops without observable side-effects. This
>> is deeply
2007 Dec 06
43
Mocks? Really?
OK, so i''ve played a bit with mocks and mock_models in controller and
view tests and i have a question. Is this statement really correct:
"We highly recommend that you exploit the mock framework here rather
than providing real model objects in order to keep the view specs
isolated from changes to your models."
(http://rspec.rubyforge.org/documentation/rails/writing/views.html