search for: that_s

Displaying 11 results from an estimated 11 matches for "that_s".

Did you mean: that's
2020 Sep 07
2
[RFC] Introducing the maynotprogress IR attribute
On 9/7/20 4:48 PM, Nicolai Hähnle wrote: > Hi Johannes, > > > On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 11:17 PM Johannes Doerfert > <johannesdoerfert at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > As a separate comment, I don't find the reference to the C++ spec in >> >> > https://reviews.llvm.org/D86233 to be informative enough. Whenever >> >> > that
2005 Mar 15
1
Samba and cups printing: lp_servicenumber: couldn't find hl5150d
Hello, found no answer for the following elsewhere setting up samba on a Debian box: The printer is seen on the net from the clients but no printing is possible. $ smbclient -L pichuco Domain=[TANGO] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.0.10-Debian] Domain=[TANGO] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.0.10-Debian] Anonymous login successful Sharename Type Comment --------- ---- ------- public
2018 Apr 10
0
Question about subset
Thanks. That works great! > df <- data.frame(x=c(1,1,NA,NA,2), y=c('a','a','a','b','b'), z=c(TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE)) > cond1 <- 'x==1' > cond2 <- 'x==1 & z' > df x y z 1 1 a TRUE 2 1 a FALSE 3 NA a TRUE 4 NA b FALSE 5 2 b TRUE > subset(df, subset = ifelse(is.na(eval(parse(text=cond1))), TRUE,
2024 Sep 15
1
Possible update to survival
I got good feedback from the list about a scope issue, so I am coming back for more. Prior issue: users who type survival::coxph(survival::Surv(time, status) ~ x1 + x2 + surv ival::strata(group), data=mydata) This messes up the character string matching for strata, done via tt <- terms(formula, specials= ?strata?). The code runs, and gives the wrong answer (group is treated as an ordinary
2020 Sep 07
2
[RFC] Introducing the maynotprogress IR attribute
On 9/7/20 10:56 AM, Nicolai Hähnle wrote: > Hi Johannes and Atmn, > > On Sat, Sep 5, 2020 at 7:07 AM Johannes Doerfert via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>  > In any case, please explain the intended behavior of the attribute and >>  > the metadata upon inlining. >> >> The attribute will be attached to the caller upon
2020 Sep 07
4
[RFC] Introducing the maynotprogress IR attribute
On 9/7/20 2:52 PM, Nicolai Hähnle wrote: > Hi Johannes, > > On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 6:51 PM Johannes Doerfert > <johannesdoerfert at gmail.com> wrote: >> On 9/7/20 10:56 AM, Nicolai Hähnle wrote: >>  > Hi Johannes and Atmn, >>  > >>  > On Sat, Sep 5, 2020 at 7:07 AM Johannes Doerfert via llvm-dev >>  > <llvm-dev at
2018 Nov 29
2
'git llvm push' not working for me on Windows
Excellent, thanks! --paulr From: James Y Knight [mailto:jyknight at google.com] Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2018 12:00 PM To: Robinson, Paul Cc: Mikhail Ramalho; vedant_kumar at apple.com; llvm-dev Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] 'git llvm push' not working for me on Windows Aha! From your output I figured out what I screwed up. Sorry about the trouble... Illustration of the issue: svn
2019 Feb 01
2
'git llvm push' not working for me on Windows
The usual workaround is to do `rm –rf .git/llvm-upstream-svn` and try again. You could also patch llvm/utils/git-svn/git-llvm to add the `--verbose` option to the `git apply` command, which would provide better diagnostic output. HTH, --paulr From: Petr Hosek [mailto:phosek at chromium.org] Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2019 10:52 PM To: Robinson, Paul Cc: James Y Knight; llvm-dev; vedant_kumar at
2018 Nov 28
2
'git llvm push' not working for me on Windows
Poking around in the .git\llvm-upstream-svn tree, I find that llvm\trunk\test\DebugInfo\Generic is empty, as are all the other subdirectories of test\DebugInfo that I tried. I have other files in the checkin that are in leaf directories but those files all exist. I hacked git-llvm to add a –verbose option: `git apply --verbose -p2 -` returned 1 Checking patch
2020 Sep 05
4
[RFC] Introducing the maynotprogress IR attribute
On 9/4/20 7:39 PM, Hal Finkel via llvm-dev wrote: > > On 9/4/20 6:31 PM, Atmn Patel via llvm-dev wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> We’ve prepared a new function attribute `maynotprogress` and loop >> metadata `llvm.loop.mustprogress` in order to better formalize the way >> LLVM deals with infinite loops without observable side-effects. This >> is deeply
2007 Dec 06
43
Mocks? Really?
OK, so i''ve played a bit with mocks and mock_models in controller and view tests and i have a question. Is this statement really correct: "We highly recommend that you exploit the mock framework here rather than providing real model objects in order to keep the view specs isolated from changes to your models." (http://rspec.rubyforge.org/documentation/rails/writing/views.html