search for: thangorodrim

...ient to failures the Ceph backend will be. Thanks. Sincerely, Ewen ________________________________ From: Gluster-users <gluster-users-bounces at gluster.org> on behalf of gagan tiwari <gagan.tiwari at mathisys-india.com> Sent: April 17, 2025 2:14 AM To: Alexander Schreiber <als at thangorodrim.ch> Cc: gluster-users at gluster.org <gluster-users at gluster.org> Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster with ZFS HI Alexander, Thanks for the update. Initially, I also thought of deploying Ceph but ceph is quite difficult to set-up and manage. Moreover, it&...

...#39;s also hardware demanding. I think it's most suitable for a very large set-up with hundreds of clients. What do you think of MooseFS ? Have you or anyone else tried MooseFS. If yes, how was its performance? Thanks, Gagan On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 1:45?PM Alexander Schreiber <als at thangorodrim.ch> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 09:40:08AM +0530, gagan tiwari wrote: > > Hi Guys, > > We have been using OpenZFS in our HPC environment for > > quite some time. And OpenZFS was going fine. > > > > But we are now running into scalability i...

...e for a very large set-up? with hundreds of > clients.? > > What do you think of MooseFS ?? Have you or anyone else tried > MooseFS.?If yes, how was its performance? > > Thanks, > Gagan > > > > On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 1:45?PM Alexander Schreiber > <als at thangorodrim.ch> wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 09:40:08AM +0530, gagan tiwari wrote: > > > Hi Guys, > > > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? We have been? using OpenZFS in our HPC > > > environment for > > > quite some time. And OpenZFS was going fine. > > > > >...

On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 09:40:08AM +0530, gagan tiwari wrote: > Hi Guys, > We have been using OpenZFS in our HPC environment for > quite some time. And OpenZFS was going fine. > > But we are now running into scalability issues since OpenZFS can't be > scaled out. Since ZFS is a local FS, you are essentially limited to how much storage you can stick into

...just the RAM state. So depending on how you've set it up, throwing more hardware at Ceph, might not improve performance much. Thanks. Sincerely, Ewen ________________________________ From: Gluster-users <gluster-users-bounces at gluster.org> on behalf of Alexander Schreiber <als at thangorodrim.ch> Sent: April 17, 2025 7:54 AM To: gagan tiwari <gagan.tiwari at mathisys-india.com> Cc: gluster-users at gluster.org <gluster-users at gluster.org> Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster with ZFS On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 02:44:28PM +0530, gagan tiwari wrote: > HI Alexander, >...

On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 02:44:28PM +0530, gagan tiwari wrote: > HI Alexander, > Thanks for the update. Initially, I also > thought of deploying Ceph but ceph is quite difficult to set-up and manage. > Moreover, it's also hardware demanding. I think it's most suitable for a > very large set-up with hundreds of clients. I strongly disagree. I

On Sat, Oct 28, 2023 at 11:07:52PM +0300, Zakhar Kirpichenko wrote: > I don't think it's worth it for anyone. It's a dead project since about > 9.0, if not earlier. It's time to embrace the truth and move on. Which is shame because I choose GlusterFS for one of my storage clusters _specifically_ due to the ease of emergency data recovery (for purely replicated volumes) even