search for: thakis

...there some tweakable to tell the kernel "please don't kill my processes"? Here's an example from just now: FAIL: LLVM :: MC/X86/shuffle-comments.s (18589 of 28139) ******************** TEST 'LLVM :: MC/X86/shuffle-comments.s' FAILED ******************** Script: -- /Users/thakis/src/chromefetch/src/third_party/llvm-bootstrap/./bin/llvm-mc /Volumes/MacintoshHD2/src/chromefetch/src/third_party/llvm/test/MC/X86/shuffle-comments.s -triple=x86_64-unknown-unknown | /Users/thakis/src/chromefetch/src/third_party/llvm-bootstrap/./bin/FileCheck /Volumes/MacintoshHD2/src/chromefetch/...

...e from the same invocation. Surely ninja could spawn two links, which then independently report "Creating library" after ninja emits the [N/M] lines. --paulr From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of via llvm-dev Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2018 9:01 AM To: thakis at chromium.org Cc: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Ninja build (on Windows anyway) may be doing redundant work OK, worth knowing. Thanks. --paulr From: Nico Weber [mailto:thakis at chromium.org] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2018 7:11 PM To: Robinson, Paul Cc: Zachary Turner; ll...

...o with it. On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 6:57 PM <paul.robinson at sony.com> wrote: > I'm more concerned about seeing the message come out twice, which implies > Ninja is executing a rule twice when it doesn't need to. > > --paulr > > > > *From:* Nico Weber [mailto:thakis at chromium.org] > *Sent:* Monday, November 19, 2018 6:09 PM > *To:* Zachary Turner > *Cc:* Robinson, Paul; llvm-dev > *Subject:* Re: [llvm-dev] Ninja build (on Windows anyway) may be doing > redundant work > > > > Do you still see this if you use lld-link for linking? &g...

...lar development? (what combination of LLVM repos were > checked out and being tested simultaneously?) > > -- Sean Silva > > >> ******************** TEST 'LLVM :: MC/X86/shuffle-comments.s' FAILED >> ******************** >> Script: >> -- >> /Users/thakis/src/chromefetch/src/third_party/llvm-bootstrap/./bin/llvm-mc >> /Volumes/MacintoshHD2/src/chromefetch/src/third_party/llvm/test/MC/X86/shuffle-comments.s >> -triple=x86_64-unknown-unknown | >> /Users/thakis/src/chromefetch/src/third_party/llvm-bootstrap/./bin/FileCheck >> /V...

On Wed, Jun 5, 2019 at 1:33 PM <vsk at apple.com> wrote: > > > On Jun 4, 2019, at 4:41 PM, Nico Weber <thakis at chromium.org> wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 2:06 PM <vsk at apple.com> wrote: > >> Hi Nico, >> >> Sorry for the delay, I've been OOO. The llvm-cov bot should produce >> reports for llvm-undname starting today. >> > > Thanks! It looks...

On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 2:11 PM <vsk at apple.com> wrote: > > > On Jun 6, 2019, at 9:56 AM, Nico Weber <thakis at chromium.org> wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 5, 2019 at 1:33 PM <vsk at apple.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Jun 4, 2019, at 4:41 PM, Nico Weber <thakis at chromium.org> wrote: >> >> On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 2:06 PM <vsk at apple.com> wrote: >>...

...os and cons of making it a stable target? Does anyone else have any concerns about doing so? -Chris > On Feb 14, 2020, at 7:59 AM, Nico Weber via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > +better dylanmckay address > > On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 10:58 AM Nico Weber <thakis at chromium.org <mailto:thakis at chromium.org>> wrote: > Hi, > > There was a thread a few days ago about the expectations for experimental targets. At the moment, the only experimental target is AVR. It's been in the tree for a long time now, and generally seems well-behaved...

...an may have a better idea. I'm reasonably certain that the missing +x is just an oversight. -Chris > On May 30, 2019, at 6:24 PM, Nico Weber via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Vedant or Chris: Ping :) > > On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 7:56 AM Nico Weber <thakis at chromium.org <mailto:thakis at chromium.org>> wrote: > Hi Vedant and Chris, > > is the config for http://lab.llvm.org:8080/coverage/coverage-reports/index.html <http://lab.llvm.org:8080/coverage/coverage-reports/index.html> public somewhere? If so, where? (I looked in zo...

On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 3:57 PM David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 12:42 PM Nico Weber <thakis at chromium.org> wrote: > >> On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 3:32 PM David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 12:07 PM Nico Weber via cfe-dev < >>> cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>&g...

Hi, I got a forced update when pulling today. If I merge master to a local branch, I get a bunch of add/add conflicts. This same commit exists under several hashes: https://github.com/llvm-project/llvm-project-20170507/commit/687841777ef505 https://github.com/llvm-project/llvm-project-20170507/commit/74725885552 Did someone push -f to the monorepo after doing branch surgery? Maybe there was a

Do you still see this if you use lld-link for linking? The "corrupt obj file" is something we saw on chrome's bots every now and then before we switched to lld. On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 5:27 PM Zachary Turner <zturner at google.com> wrote: > +Nico Weber <thakis at google.com> > > On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 12:25 PM via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > wrote: > >> This afternoon I did a clean build of llvm using ninja and MSVC 2015 on >> Windows 10. I saw something curious and wondered if any of the ninja or >> CM...

On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 12:05 PM, Nico Weber <thakis at chromium.org> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 8:08 AM, Nico Weber <thakis at chromium.org> wrote: > >> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Russell Wallace < >> russell.wallace at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Basic test results on Windows 7, visual stud...

On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 12:24 AM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org>wrote: > On 9 September 2013 01:09, Nico Weber <thakis at chromium.org> wrote: > >> I think depending on curses is gross, >> > > I totally agree, but I also don't have a better way of doing this. I agree > with Joerg that hard-coding escape sequences is not the way forward. > llvm is still hard-coding escape sequences...

...n as possible? Once VS 2015 is the minimum, it doesn't seem like we should worry too much about upgrading compiler versions anymore (aside from the effort to actually do it and make sure it works and the compiler bugs and issues are known about). On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 12:24 PM Nico Weber <thakis at chromium.org> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 3:16 PM, Zachary Turner <zturner at google.com> wrote: > >> I don't see how the policy of supporting 2 versions is related to that >> difficulty though. Whether we support 1 versions or 2 versions, 1 version >> i...

Hi Vedant and Chris, is the config for http://lab.llvm.org:8080/coverage/coverage-reports/index.html public somewhere? If so, where? (I looked in zorg but didn't find it.) If not, could you add "llvm-undname" to the list of binaries passed to llvm/utils/prepare-code-coverage-artifact.py so that llvm/lib/Demangle/MicrosoftDemangle.cpp (and friends) show up? (If the config is public,

On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 12:55 PM Nico Weber <thakis at chromium.org> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 12:41 PM James Y Knight <jyknight at google.com> > wrote: > >> It sounds like you ran into a bug in the test infrastructure's code to >> determine if python3 is supported. Fixing that might be harder, but it only &...

vitalybuka, sanitizer-x86_64-linux-gn is _still_ on http://lab.llvm.org:8011/console . Can we please get it removed? On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 7:07 AM Nico Weber <thakis at chromium.org> wrote: > https://reviews.llvm.org/D63909 landed. Maybe it needs a master restart > to have an effect? > > On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 1:03 PM Roman Lebedev <lebedev.ri at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Why does GN bot still send mails? >> I thought it got fi...

lld/test/ELF/invalid/symtab-sh-info.s (check-lld-elf) is recently flaky on Windows, e.g. https://reviews.llvm.org/harbormaster/unit/view/192869/ http://45.33.8.238/win/27684/step_10.txt It fails like every 3 or 4 builds. Could someone with a Windows machine check what is going on? Is that due to output non-determinism (just my guess) in yaml2obj.exe? -------------- next part -------------- An

...> > I'm reasonably certain that the missing +x is just an oversight. > > -Chris > > On May 30, 2019, at 6:24 PM, Nico Weber via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Vedant or Chris: Ping :) > > On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 7:56 AM Nico Weber <thakis at chromium.org> wrote: > >> Hi Vedant and Chris, >> >> is the config for >> http://lab.llvm.org:8080/coverage/coverage-reports/index.html public >> somewhere? If so, where? (I looked in zorg but didn't find it.) >> >> If not, could you add "...

On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 3:32 PM David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 12:07 PM Nico Weber via cfe-dev < > cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> llvmbb's job is to inform people of build breaks. However, it seems to >> trigger for a big list of bots, and at least one of them seems to always be >>