search for: texan

...Michael Graves mgraves@pixelpower.com Sr. Product Specialist www.pixelpower.com Pixel Power Inc. mgraves@mstvp.com "If the gods had meant us to vote they'd have given us candidates!" - Jim Hightower, Texan Populist ** Tag(s) inserted by Bandit Tagger98 - http://www.gbar.dtu.dk/~c918704

Please disregard my question about puppet user disablement functionality. Here is what I have so far. Can someone tell me if the syntax and constructs look correct? The goal. I want to have a function that disables a user. For each user listed, if the user is present, then disable that user. Here is my class file. /etc/puppet/classes/users.pp class users { define disableuser($user) { exec {

Does anybody care about supporting non-English message locales in rsync? (Do all sysadmins speak English? :-) Would anybody contribute translations if we had the framework? -- Martin

Hello. I''m a long time cfengine user, some might say sufferer, and I have finally managed to get around to experimenting with Puppet. So far I''m very impressed. I am trying to get puppet to configure the openntpd config file, from an ERB template, based on the node definition in the site config. What I''m trying to understand is why when I define a variable in a child

Hi all, I''ve done as much bug-fixing as I''m going to be able to do in 0.24.2, I think, so please test the current code if you can. I made some unfortunately significant changes today, in order to try to remove any shared objects in the file server, which will hopefully solve the file corruption issues, plus some very strange issues resulting from renaming

Hello, I want a simple operation in a puppet node like restarting the ssh service if it was stopped. My site.pp is simple as this: import "services/*" node default { include ssh } The services directory as a ssh.pp : class ssh { service { ssh: ensure => running, subscribe => File["/etc/ssh/sshd_config"] } } I''ve stopped the ssh service in the

For those of you out there using export/collect (which we really need to come up with a better name for...), can you test the current SVN code? I''m mostly wondering if the performance is any better. To use it, you''ll have to remove your current database, since the database schema is significantly changed. I''m getting what looks like an additional 25% reduction