search for: tevan

Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "tevan".

Did you mean: evan
2005 Sep 15
1
SSO Samba/AD integration
.../log.%m encrypt passwords = yes dns proxy = no realm = UNICITY.TLCDELIVERS.COM security = ADS wins server = 10.10.57.124 wins proxy = no ... Doing a 'getent passwd' returns users similar to: ... UNICITY+cfedeles:x:10172:10000:NAME:/home/UNICITY/cfedeles:/bin/false UNICITY+tevans:x:10173:10000:NAME:/home/UNICITY/tevans:/bin/false UNICITY+mbare:x:10174:10000:NAME:/home/UNICITY/mbare:/bin/false ... But also lists computer accounts as well: ... UNICITY+imd-gsanchez$:x:10539:10004:IMD-GSANCHEZ:/home/UNICITY/imd-gsanchez_:/bin/false UNICITY+imd-sharepoint$:x:10553:10004:IMD-SH...
2008 Apr 10
2
Cannot get UNC paths to work correctly
Hi all I wish to run 'Enterprise Architect' from Sparx Systems[1]. The installer runs just fine, and the application installs OK. The main issue is that the license key file is a shared resource - many users can utilise the same license file (legitimately I might add!) at the same time, so the license file is located on a SMB share. The key file itself has encoded into itself what the
2013 Jun 13
1
zpool labelclear destroys GPT data
When i use zpool labelclear, it wipes the whole disk including gpt data. So the whole disk is empty and i need to create the gpt partitions again. Is this supposed to work like this? The man page suggests that it only wipes the ZFS metadata. zpool labelclear [-f] device Removes ZFS label information from the specified device. The device must not be part of an active pool
2009 Sep 30
1
Update on protection against slowloris
Hi list! We tested mod_antiloris 0.4 and found it quite efficient, but before putting it in production, we would like to hear some feedback from freebsd users. We are using Apache 2.2.x on Freebsd 6.2 and 7.2. Is anyone using it? Do you have any other way to patch against Slowloris other than putting a proxy in front or using the HTTP accept filter? Thanks for your feedback, Martin
2013 Dec 04
3
BIND segway -> python -> first-class ports
On 12/4/13, 9:05 AM, Mark Felder said: ----------------- > There was no alternative; we couldn't keep BIND in base. BIND 9 will > certainly have a EoL before the EoL of FreeBSD 10.x, and we can't use > BIND 10 because it requires importing Python to base. I'm coming more and more to the conclusion that we should have a minimal Python in "base". More and more people
2007 May 24
0
[FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-07:04.file
> Subject: Re: [FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD Security Advisory > FreeBSD-SA-07:04.file > Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 15:37:36 +0200 > From: Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav <des@des.no> > To: Brian A. Seklecki <bseklecki@collaborativefusion.com> > CC: FreeBSD Security Advisories <security-advisories@freebsd.org>, > freebsd-security@freebsd.org > References: