search for: teun

...(and the internet) for any clue what might cause this poor upload performance, but failed to find anything really useful. If anyone has hints and tips on how to make my DomU''s uplink speed normal, I''d really appreciate it. I really have no idea where to look now :( TIA, Teun _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 3:46 PM, Geert Stappers via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 06:56:04PM -0400, Gene Cumm via Syslinux wrote: >> On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 6:37 PM, Gene Cumm wrote: >> > On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 10:23 AM, Geert Stappers wrote: >> >> diff --git a/core/fs/pxe/dhcp_option.c b/core/fs/pxe/dhcp_option.c >>

...r doesn't change though. Also, in my packet capture, with both settings, I don't see any DNS requests, which suggests to me it's not trying to use this field? My best guess would be that this is a bug that was introduced by the commit I mentioned earlier. What do you think? Thanks, Teun

On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 7:08 AM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 5:54 AM, Teun Docter > <teun.docter at brightcomputing.com> wrote: >> On 2015-09-12 04:58, Gene Cumm wrote: >>>> >>>> I've captured the following DHCP ACK: >>>> >>>> 10.141.20.1.bootps > 10.141.20.2.bootpc: [udp sum ok] BOOTP/DHCP, Reply, >...

...we change something in our DHCP settings? Is any further info required? As a side note, could this be related to the recent thread with the following subject: "BUG: confusion between next-server and gateway"? (http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2015-September/024090.html) Best regards, Teun

On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 5:54 AM, Teun Docter <teun.docter at brightcomputing.com> wrote: > On 2015-09-12 04:58, Gene Cumm wrote: >>> >>> I've captured the following DHCP ACK: >>> >>> 10.141.20.1.bootps > 10.141.20.2.bootpc: [udp sum ok] BOOTP/DHCP, Reply, >>> length 399, xid...

...n log in to it and everything looks normal.) I've been fiddling with the code to try and force the screen back in to text mode. No luck yet though. (Not sure if this even is the problem/related.) Any thoughts on what might be wrong here? If any further info is needed please ask me... Thanks, Teun

On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 08:42:15AM -0400, Gene Cumm via Syslinux wrote: > On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 7:37 AM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 7:08 AM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 5:54 AM, Teun Docter > >> <teun.docter at brightcomputing.com> wrote: > >>> On 2015-09-12 04:58, Gene Cumm wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> I've captured the following DHCP ACK: > >>>>> > >>>>> 10.141.20.1.bootps > 10...

On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 7:37 AM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 7:08 AM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 5:54 AM, Teun Docter >> <teun.docter at brightcomputing.com> wrote: >>> On 2015-09-12 04:58, Gene Cumm wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I've captured the following DHCP ACK: >>>>> >>>>> 10.141.20.1.bootps > 10.141.20.2.bootpc: [udp sum ok]...

>>> Oscar is on holiday for another week. But I'm pretty sure his environment should be: ... <<< (Sorry this was in my spam folder...) Well it seems Oscar is building on a 64 bit platform... Best Patrick

...Sep 12, 2015 at 08:42:15AM -0400, Gene Cumm via Syslinux wrote: >> On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 7:37 AM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: >> > On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 7:08 AM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 5:54 AM, Teun Docter >> >> <teun.docter at brightcomputing.com> wrote: >> >>> On 2015-09-12 04:58, Gene Cumm wrote: >> >>>>> >> >>>>> I've captured the following DHCP ACK: >> >>>>> >> >>>>> 10...

On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Patrick Masotta <masottaus at yahoo.com> wrote: > >>>> > > > > The empty define should work; actually it did work for many years... > > > > Your just proposed change was my first attempt for solving this but for some > > reason it did not work. After testing a lot the only way I've found to solve this

...ble-gnu-indirect-function --with-tune=generic --with-arch_32=x86-64 --build=x86_64-redhat-linux Thread model: posix gcc version 4.8.2 20140120 (Red Hat 4.8.2-16) (GCC) # nasm -v NASM version 2.10.07 compiled on Jan 26 2014 # rpm -q libuuid-devel libuuid-devel-2.23.2-16.el7.x86_64 Best regards, Teun

FYI, I can confirm that Gene's change in 229ada1 solved the problem we were seeing. So thank you for that. Best regards, Teun

On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 05:22:40AM -0700, Patrick Masotta via Syslinux wrote: > Teun wrote: } } Gene wrote } } } Smells like an optimizer/stripper bug :( } } } Patrick, Oscar what build environment do you use? > > Oscar is on holiday for another week. But I'm pretty sure his > > environment should be: > > ... } } # gcc -v } } Using built-in specs. } } COLLE...

On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 5:24 PM, Teun Docter via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > Hello list, > > We have a scenario where our TFTP server is not the same IP as our DHCP > server. While testing with 6.03, our setup works just fine. > > However with the master branch, for some reason pxelinux.0 is fetche...