Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "testual".
2003 Dec 23
2
[LLVMdev] GCC3.5 tree-ssa
why doesn't llvm transfer bytecode to RTL form?
I mean the cross-platform compile in GCC.
Could LLVM do that?
maybe tree-ssa also create the representation with a testual format if
needed.
is it very difficalt?
I want to know.
BWT:
if we port pthread library to llvm, what do we consider at first?
yueqiang
Chris Lattner wrote:
>On Wed, 24 Dec 2003, yue wrote:
>
>
>>what difference is between gcc3.5 tree-ssa and llvm?
>>
>>
>
&...
2003 Dec 23
2
[LLVMdev] GCC3.5 tree-ssa
...rs). Also "C" is a very stable interface
>language, where the RTL interfaces and APIs are constantly changing. The
>one advantage an RTL backend would have over the C backend is speed of
>compilation.
>
>
>
>>maybe tree-ssa also create the representation with a testual format if
>>needed. is it very difficalt? I want to know.
>>
>>
>
>There are _very strong_ political reasons that will prevent this from
>happening any time in the near future. I suggest that you ask on the GCC
>list if you want more details. All tree-ssa support...
2003 Dec 23
0
[LLVMdev] GCC3.5 tree-ssa
...with
the GCC and Intel compilers). Also "C" is a very stable interface
language, where the RTL interfaces and APIs are constantly changing. The
one advantage an RTL backend would have over the C backend is speed of
compilation.
> maybe tree-ssa also create the representation with a testual format if
> needed. is it very difficalt? I want to know.
There are _very strong_ political reasons that will prevent this from
happening any time in the near future. I suggest that you ask on the GCC
list if you want more details. All tree-ssa supports are some debugging
dumps, which do not...
2003 Dec 23
0
[LLVMdev] GCC3.5 tree-ssa
...y stable interface
> >language, where the RTL interfaces and APIs are constantly changing. The
> >one advantage an RTL backend would have over the C backend is speed of
> >compilation.
> >
> >
> >
> >>maybe tree-ssa also create the representation with a testual format if
> >>needed. is it very difficalt? I want to know.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >There are _very strong_ political reasons that will prevent this from
> >happening any time in the near future. I suggest that you ask on the GCC
> >list if you want more...
2003 Dec 23
1
[LLVMdev] GCC3.5 tree-ssa
...nguage, where the RTL interfaces and APIs are constantly changing. The
> > >one advantage an RTL backend would have over the C backend is speed of
> > >compilation.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >>maybe tree-ssa also create the representation with a testual format if
> > >>needed. is it very difficalt? I want to know.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >There are _very strong_ political reasons that will prevent this from
> > >happening any time in the near future. I suggest that you ask on the GCC...
2003 Dec 23
2
[LLVMdev] GCC3.5 tree-ssa
hi,
what difference is between gcc3.5 tree-ssa and llvm?
yueqiang
2003/12/24
2003 Dec 23
0
[LLVMdev] GCC3.5 tree-ssa
On Wed, 24 Dec 2003, yue wrote:
> what difference is between gcc3.5 tree-ssa and llvm?
They are completely different projects. The short version is that LLVM is
more mature and stable than tree-ssa is, LLVM supports interprocedural and
runtime optimization, and LLVM has a well defined intermediate
representation with a textual format. On the other hand tree-ssa may be a
part of GCC 3.5